Intention To Create Legal Relations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Presumption for intention to create legal relations

A

Presumed to exist in a business agreement but not in a social or domestic one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Case where a business did not have intention to create legal relations

A

Jones v Vernon Pools - “binding in honour only”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who is burden of proof for proving itclr for business arrangements on?

A

Person seeking to establish that there is no legal intention - Edwards v Skyways
Objective - Edmunds v Lawson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can itclr be found when promoting a business?

A

Yes - Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Custom and Excise, free gift with petrol
McGowan v Radio Buxton, prize for radio competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case involving letter of comfort

A

Kleinwort Benson v Malaysian Mining Corporation - comfort letter was not legally binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

‘Halfway house’ case for itclr

A

Sadler v Reynolds - burden was on journalist to probe there was itclr

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case to say itclr more likely to be found at a point where the relationship is not amicable

A

Balfour v Balfour - claim failed as agreement was made at amicable point of relationship
Merritt v Merritt - agreement was made after separation so itclr was evident
Jones v Padavatton - when first arrangement was made the two were close so claim failed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case to say itclr more likely to be found if money changes hands

A

Simpkins v Pays - lottery ticket shared
Wilson v Burnett - other women asked if she would share which indicates there was no agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case to say if a person puts their security at risk itclr more likely

A

Parker v Clarke - sold their house presuming they would inherit the older couples’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly