intention-behaviour gap Flashcards

1
Q

define intention

A

self-instruction to perform particular behaviours or to obtain certain outcomes
indication of how hard you will try or effort will be exerted to achieve outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

are attitudes good behavioural predictors?

A

no - effect of attitudes is mediated by intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

mediator vs moderator

A
  • mediator = mechanisms (e.g. intention mediates attidudes and behaviour)
  • moderator = variable changing strength of relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

influence of past behaviour on intentions

A

reflecting on past behaviour to determine intention -> no actual intention, but copying past behaviour - unconscious influences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how to study intention-behaviour experimentally

A

manipulate intention and the follow-up behaviour
see to what extent changes in intention lead to behaviour change

interventions have large impact on intention but much smaller on behaviour - other variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

reasons for failing to act on intention (5)

A
  • intention viability - impossible because of lack of abilities, resources, opportunities
  • counter intentional habits - smaller impact on frequent behaviours
  • lack of resources - e.g. food in plastic packaging is unavoidable
  • intention activation - context and conflicting goals change intensity of intention relative to other intentions e.g. rushing because you’re almost late is more important than finding a recycling bin
  • intention elaboration - saying “eat healthy” doesn’t say how to perform this - too broad
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

impact of monitoring goal progress on behaviours

A

more monitoring = more progress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

visible vs invisible progress (chocolate study)

A

dieters asked to taste test chocolates and report back
one group put wrappers in bin and other left on table
table group ate less - restrained with public attention and being able to see how many they have eaten - confronted with it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why do people monitor goals or not?
(2 why, 1 why not)

A

good:
* identify discrepancies - where you are and where you want to be
* allocation of effort between goals

why not
* confronting unpleasant truth - progress isn’t that good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

different ways of monitoring impact on goals

A

monitor behaviours or outcomes - whichever you measure will be impacted
therefore monitoring exercise when your goal is to loose weight isn’t as effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what impacts effect monitoring progress has:
reference values
public/private
recorded/not recorded

A

reference values:
* comparison to where you were before
* comparison to where you are trying to go
* comparison to others
effect is very similar for before vs after comparison

public vs private:
* public e.g. weight watchers
* private reported
* private not reported
more public is much more effective - not reported is by far least effective

recorded vs not recorded
recorded progress is much more effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HAPA

A

health action process approach
preintentional phase - motivational process:
action self-efficacy and outcome expectancies influence intention

post-intentional phase - volitional processes:
volitional self-efficacy, action planning and coping planning lead to behaviour

intention as the starting point for wilful action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

action planning

A

link goal-directed behaviour to environmental cues by specifying when, where, and how to act
mediates intention with coping planning
identifies cues which can trigger action
helps start behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

coping planning

A

identify potential barriers to intended action and plan to manage/overcome them
mental stimulation of overcoming anticipated barriers
mediates intention with action planning
prevents goal striving being derailed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

rubicon model of action phases (4)

A
  1. pre-decisional phase = deliberation over which goal to pursue and forming an intention - similar to motivational phase in HAPA
  2. pre-actional phase = when where and how to act
  3. action phase = behaviour is initiated and maintained if necessary
  4. post-actional phase = outcome is evaluated against desired - similar to monitoring progress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

implementation intentions

A

if-then planning
IF = opportunity to act
THEN = goal directed response

15
Q

implementation intention experiment - students completing tasks

A

2 conditions:
* goal intention = i will perform [task] on wednesday at [select time]
* implementation intetion = if it is wednesday at [select time] then i will perform [task]

results:
commitment to task didn’t vary
time when task was completed did vary
implementation intention did the task 100 mins late vs 480 mins late in goal intention condition

16
Q

planning and goal achievement experiment - students needing tetanus shots

A

manipulated fear = showed impact tetanus would have
manipulated action planning = told where and when to go to get what and asked to look at schedule to find a time they could go get it

results:
fear wasn’t very effective but action plan was

very small sample - 59 in groups were eligible and only 9 got it - 8 from action plan condition

17
Q

planning and goal achievement experiment - gamblers

A

184 gamblers going into a casino measured using index of gambling severity
reported intended spend before entering
2 conditions:
* assessment = described readiness to use strategies to limit spending
* assessment and action and coping plan = specified how, what and when to implement strategy, identified barriers and how to address these - if-then plan

results:
problem gamblers spent much less than intended with action plan

limits - problem gamblers spent same in both conditions but intentions were very different - not consistent data

18
Q

planning and goal achievement experiment - cervical smear (+ eval)

A

114 women due one - idea that women don’t go as they have to phone to book
2 conditions:
* control = questionnaire
* implementation intention = questionnaire + told they are more likely to go if they plan when and where, then asked to write when, where, and how they’ll book an appointment
measured attendance at screening over 3 months (from medical records)

results:
92% attendance in experimental vs 69% in control

positives:
objective behavioural measure used
random allocation of conditions
real life - applications to medicine

negatives:
demand effects - do what they think experiment wants them to do
more similar to an action plan than implementation intention (If-then)

19
Q

meta-analysis of HAPA studies findings - post-intentional phase

A

intention strength effects likelihood to make plans - medium effect size

20
Q

effect of forming implementation intentions - meta-analysis

A

medium effect size on behaviour (0.67)
effective across:
* published and unpublished
* student and non-student participants
* self-report and objective measures
* behaviour types and self-regulatory problems

21
Q

action vs coping plans with intention to exercise after cardiac problems study

A

after 2 months - action and coping have very little effect, older = less active, more active before = more active after
after 4 months - age isn’t predictive any longer, previous activity is a stronger predictor, action planning = no effect, coping planning = small effect

conclusions:
coding planning is more effective later on
idea that action plans help initiate behaviours (not shown by these results tho)

22
Q

how implementation intentions work (2 reasons)

A

heightened cue accessibility = environment triggers association so behaviour becomes accessible - perceptually ready to encounter situation

strong cue-response links = association means no deliberation is needed when situation is encountered about what to do - automatic activation of response

23
Q

“f” counting study

A

asked to count number of fs in a paragraph
2 conditions:
goal intention:
* i intend to count all the fs
* i intend to count all the fs on my fingers
implementation intention condition:
*as soon as i see the letter f, i will add one more to my count
*as soon as i see the letter f, i will count it on my fingers

results = more successful at getting correct number in implementation intention condition

24
Q

habitual use of bikes study (Eindhoven - Netherlands)

A

measured extent to which cycling was habitual - how often they go by bike
random allocation to either plan travel goals or plan how to fix puncture (control)
association task of a location and mode of transport - asked to say whether it is realistic to travel there
measured speed of identifying cycling as appropriate on 5 critical trials

results:
habitual were much faster than nonhabitual in control condition
both were faster in experimental condition than control

25
Q

mechanisms of implementation intentions (4 stages)

A
  1. implementation intention in if-then format
  2. heightened cue accessibility and strong cue-response link
  3. strategic automaticity - opportunities identified quickly and easily without conscious deliberation - remaining flexible and sensitive to goal
  4. goal achievement