intent to permanently deprive

Question 1

Lavender

Answer 1

D took doors from one council house to replace his gfs council house doors

treated it as his own to dispose of

Question 2

Velumyl

Answer 2

D took £1050 from employer’s safe to lend to a friend

-employee is permanently deprived of that money so it is theft

Question 3

R v Lloyd

Answer 3

Cinema employee gives film to the defendant to make a copy and the defendant returns it before the schedule showing
-The practical value of the thing was NOT lost as he returned it before showing

Question 4

DPP v J and Others

Answer 4

D picked up the headphones, broke them and gave them back

-Permanently deprived the owner of the headphones as a practical value has been lost

Question 5

conditional intent definition

Answer 5

it’s not enough on its own to establish liability for theft

look at Easom if confused

Question 6

Easom

Answer 6

D picked up handbag at the cinema, they went through it but they didn’t take anything so it’s not theft, it’s conditional intent