Influence of Early Attachments on Later Relationships Flashcards

1
Q

What did Bowlby suggest about the influence of early attachments on later relationships?

A

Internal Working Model
That a child forms a mental representation of their relationship with their primary caregiver which become a template for future relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Glaser (2006) do and find?

A

Used a longitudinal study to find a link between early attachments and later social/emotional behaviour

Secure = more independence, ambitious

Avoidant = aggressiveness

Resistant = higher anxiety & withdrawn behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How can the quality of first attachment affect future relationships?

A

Loving first attachment = functional relationships

Bad first attachment = struggle to form relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 2 aspects of the influence of early attachments?

A

Childhood relationships
Adult relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who performed studies on the influence of attachments on childhood relationships?

A

Sroufe et al (2005) - Minnesota child-parent study - development in school

Myron-Wilson & Smith (1998) - bullying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Sroufe et al (2005) find in his Minnesota child-parent study?

A

Found continuity between early attachments & later emotional/social behaviour

Securely attached infants were, during childhood:
- higher social competence
- Less isolated & more popular
- More empathetic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How can Sroufe et al’s (Minnesota) findings be explained?

A

Explained with the IWN as securely attached infants have higher expectations that others are friendly & trusting which makes it easier to form relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Myron-Wilson & Smith (1998) do?

A

Assessed attachment type & bullying involvement using questionnaires

Securely attached = not involved
Insecure-avoidant = victims
Insecure-resistant = bullies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the strengths of the influence of attachments on childhood relationships?

A

Research support
- Minnesota study (2005)
- Myron-Wilson & Smith (1998)

Minnesota study is longitudinal - lower chance of confounding variables - higher validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the weakness of the influence of attachment on childhood relationships?

A

Flawed Methodology- Myron-Wilson & Smith sued a questionnaire to get data
- Social desirability bias
- Participants may have lied about the bullying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the main study showing the influence of attachments on adult relationships?

A

Hazan & Shaver (1987)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Hazan & Shaver do?

A

Created a love quiz in an American newspaper which asked questions about current attachments and previous attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the results of Hazan & Shaver’s study (1987)?

A

Over half were securely attached and had happier and longer-lasting relationships - could easily rely on others & form relationships

Insecure-avoidant participants doubted the existence of love and tended to be jealous - difficult depending on others

Both insecure types were vulnerable to loneliness

Insecure resistant worried about whether their partners truly loved them or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the conclusions made from Hazan & Shaver’s study (1987)?

A

Similar distribution of attachments to strange situation studies

Correlation between adult attachments & their attachment during infancy is similar to Ainsworth’s findings where children attachment styles correlated with sensitivity shown by mothers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What behaviours are influenced by the internal working model?

A

Childhood friendships/development (Minnesota child-parent study)

Poor parenting (Harlow & Quinton)

Romantic relationships (Hazan & Shaver)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the weaknesses of the influence of early attachments on later relationships?

A

Evidence on continuity is mixed

Most supporting studies measuring the IWM lack validity (self-report)

Association doesn’t not mean causation - 3rd variable = temperament of child or parenting style

Influence of early attachments is probabilistic, not definite

17
Q

How is evidence on continuity mixed?

A

IWM predicts continuity based on infant attachment however, researchers such as Zimmerman (2000) found little relationship between infant & adult attachments

18
Q

How is the influence of early attachments probabilistic and not definite?

A

Researchers may have exaggerated

Clark & Clark (1998) said that people aren’t doomed to have bad relationships in the future due to bad infancy attachments

19
Q

What are the 2 consequences of the Internal Working Model?

A
  1. Short term term = gives the child insight into the caregiver’s behaviour & enables the child to influence the caregiver’s behaviour - partnership
  2. Long term - acts as a template for all future relationships because it generates expectations about what intimate, loving relationships are like