Infant Feeding And Disease Risk Flashcards
Methodology for infant feeding recommendations (observational studies, RCTs, follow up studies) and PROS and CONS
- observational: large sample sizes, disease end points available. But not randomised so cannot conclude causality, also different definitions of EBF, issues of reverse causality (alternation of behaviour due to disease outcome)
- RCTs: gold standard for causality. But unethical to randomise, expensive, and difficult to standardise due to different compositions of milk
- follow up studies: issues with selection bias, loss of power, high attrition rates
Experimental study for breastfeeding: RCT with donor BM vs formula
- donor breastmilk versus formula for 1 month
- preterm babies
- breastmilk showed better blood lipids, better BP in adolescence, reduced NEC, tolerated EN better, lower requirements for PN
Experimental study: PROHIBIT breastfeeding promotion study
- breastfeeding promotion
- 1 year: lower GI infections, atopic dermatitis
- 6 years: higher IQ, but no effect on BP or anthropometry
- at 11.5 years: no effect on adiposity, obesity, fat mass
- at 16 years: obesity was greater in the BF arm
Key findings of the LANCET report on BF: impact on baby, mother, infection, obesity
- impact on baby: improved malocclusion, intelligence, reduction in overweight and diabetes, no difference in allergies/asthma/BP/cholesterol
- impact on women: reduces breast cancer, T2DM, ovarian cancer, improved birth spacing
- in LMIC babies had reduced diarrhoea and respiratory infection
- demonstrates a 26% protection against obesity
Nutritional and non-nutritional reasons children need complementary feeding
- nutritional: need additional nutrients not present in high amounts in breastmilk (i.e Fe)
- non-nutritional: cultural preferences, behavioural, induction of tolerance and taste preferences
Potential issues with introduction of complementary foods
- risk nutritional deficits
- hygiene
- food availability
- allergy
- risk of infection
Aspects to consider: timing of complementary foods
- developmental readiness: do they have adequate neuromuscular development for a safe swallow?
- GI and renal development: can they handle radical nutritional changes?
- social and cultural factors
- maternal preference
- nutritional adequacy: how long can breastmilk meet requirements for? Some studies suggest just need additional vit D and K supplements, others suggest that Fe deficiency may occur with prolonged breastfeeding
Expert opinions on EBF: WHO
- WHO recommend exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months with feeding continuing for 1 year
- based on an SLR
- mother: increased weight loss and reduced menses
- baby: no impact on infant mortality or growth, but may lower infant morbidity (diarrhoea and GI infection) but not in all countries
Expert opinions on EBF: EFSA NDA panel
- commissioned a literature review
- did not include key health benefits of EBF, the effects of different textures and varieties of food
- concluded that current evidence doesnt give a specific age for more appropriate CF
- but, provided food was of appropriate texture and was nutritionally complete then there were no adverse outcomes associated with introduction of complementary foods
- skills for finger foods can be seen at 4 months
Expert opinions on EBF: USDA
- CF at 4 months doesnt lead to any measurable negative outcomes versus 6 months
- early introduction of CF at 4 months doesnt improve Fe status
- early introduction of allergens doesnt increase allergy risk
Conclusions on introduction of allergy foods
- general agreement that there is no need to delay introduction
‘At risk’ nutrients with prolonged breastfeeding
- Fe, vitamin D, iodine, ALA, DHA
What are the concerns with complementary feeding for LMIC versus HIC?
- HIC: too high energy density
- LMIC: provision of sufficient nutrients
At 12 months, what is the proportion of food infants are eating and what is the size of their stomach?
- eating 12% of their body weight everyday
- 200 mL capacity stomach
Complementary feeding and fat
- do not restrict- need to have high kcal density
- no link between fat intake and later adiposity
- need to avoid trans fats and focus on fats with essential nutrients: soybean and rapeseed oil
Complementary feeding and protein
- should keep to <15% of kcal intake
- avoid cows milk for first year of life (too high in protein and poor Fe source)
- in LMIC need to focus on good biological sources of Fe such as eggs, fish
- biological sources of protein has lower levels of anti-nutrients
Complementary feeding and carbohydrates
- dont want too high fibre or sugar
- no nutritional requirements for free sugars and may impact glycaemia and obesity risk
- lactose and fructose from fruits are completely fine
Iron and zinc and complementary feeding
- requirements are very high in first 5 months of life
- Fe: 9x adult male, Zn 4x adult male
- inadequate intake leads to stunting, infection and anaemia
- high bioavailability in red meats and fortified cereals
Baby led weaning
- not enough evidence that they are getting enough food for Fe stores, and denote and increased choking risk
- papers have found that it doesnt lead to reduced risk of overweight or healthier growth
- but can lead to greater enjoyment of food and reduced food fussiness
- instead, use responsive feeding: responding to infant hunger and satiety cues, not all crying is due to hunger, do not use food as comfort or reward
WHO feeding principles
- EBF at 6 months and continue for 1 year
- CF at 6-8.9 months
- minimum dietary diversity at 6-23.9 months. Foods from >4 food groups in last 24 hours (dairy, legumes/nuts, fruit/veg, vit A fruit/veg, eggs, flesh foods, grains/roots/tubers)
- minimum meal frequency is at least 2 per day up to 8.9 months, >8.9 months is at least 3 per day
- Fe rich or Fe fortified foods
Important considerations for HIC, LIC and both
- HIC: EBF for at least 4 months, protein <15% intake, avoid excessive cows milk
- LIC: EBF for at least 6 months, energy and nutrient dense foods, high quality protein sources (animal)
- both: no added sugars, good sources of Fe and Zn, allergenic foods treated like other CF, responsive feeding