Industrial and Labour Policy changes Flashcards
Key Features of
Industrial Policy Resolution of 1948 (IPR 1948)
Mixed Economy: A blend of public (government-owned) and private enterprises.
State Control: Government held major roles in strategic and key industries.
Industrial Classification: Industries divided into four categories:
Exclusive Public Sector: Arms, ammunition, atomic energy, railways
Public and Private Sector: Coal, iron & steel, aircraft manufacturing, etc.
Regulated Private Sector: Heavy chemicals, sugar, etc
Open to Private Enterprise: All remaining industries
Objectives of
Industrial Policy Resolution of 1948 (IPR 1948)
Promote rapid industrialization
Develop heavy and basic industries
Reduce reliance on foreign imports
Ensure equitable distribution of wealth
Improve standards of living
Purpose of Industrial Development and Regulation Act of 1951 (IDRA 1951)
Implement the vision of the Industrial Policy Resolutions (IPR)
Ensure industries developed in line with national priorities
Promote efficient use of resources
Encourage technology adoption and innovation
Protect small-scale industries
Key Provisions of Industrial Development and Regulation Act of 1951 (IDRA 1951)
Industrial Licensing: Required for new large-scale undertakings or substantial expansion in ‘scheduled industries’. Ensured planned growth.
Price and Distribution Controls: Government could regulate prices and distribution of essential goods, preventing profiteering.
Power to Direct Industry: Government could issue directions to industries to ensure production of critical items or take over operations where necessary.
Central Advisory Council: A body of experts and representatives to advise the government on industrial policy matters.
Significance of IDRA 1951
Played a crucial role in shaping India’s early industrialization and preventing concentration of economic power.
Led to the creation of a strong public sector in strategic areas.
IDRA underwent several amendments over the years, reflecting changing economic policies and focus on liberalization.
Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956 (IPR 1956)
Context: Building on IPR 1948, India’s adoption of a socialistic pattern of society.
Emphasis: Greater role for the public sector and development of heavy industries.
Revised Industrial Classification (IPR 1956)
Schedule A: Exclusive responsibility of the State. Expanded from IPR 1948 to include 17 industries like heavy machinery, minerals, and more.
Schedule B: Progressively state-owned, but private sector could start new units. Included key industries like fertilizers, machine tools, and more.
Schedule C: Remaining industries left primarily to the private sector, subject to government regulation.
Objectives of IPR 1956
Main Aims:
Reduce income and wealth inequalities
Expand employment opportunities
Prevent the concentration of economic power
Additional Focus:
Developing heavy and capital goods industries for self-reliance
Expanding public sector
Promoting small-scale and cottage industries
Reducing regional disparities in development
Significance of IPR 1956
Marked a definitive shift towards the socialistic model
Laid the foundation for large-scale public sector investment in key industries
Shaped India’s industrial landscape for decades
Monopolies Commission (India)
Objectives
Established: 1960 under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act)
Objective:
Prevent concentration of economic power
Promote fair competition
Protect consumer interests
Monopolies Commission (India)
functions
Investigate and inquire into mergers, acquisitions, and monopolistic practices
Recommend corrective measures to the government
Issue directions to companies to prevent unfair practices
Advise the government on matters related to competition and monopolies
Replaced By: Competition Commission of India (CCI) in 2002
Reason for Replacement: MRTP Act considered outdated, CCI has broader powers to address anti-competitive practices.
Industrial Policy Statement of 1973
Context
Increasing concern over concentration of economic power.
Focus on social justice and reducing regional imbalances.
Key Provisions of Industrial Policy Statement of 1973
Restrictions on Large Industrial Houses: MRTP (Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices) Act applied to companies exceeding a certain asset threshold for expansion or setting up new businesses. 20 crore
Foreign Companies: Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) imposed stricter regulations - foreign ownership could not exceed 40% in most sectors.
Joint Sector: A new concept designed to encourage partnerships between public sector companies and private entities.
Small-Scale Sector Promotion: Reservation of specific products for production exclusively by small-scale industries.
Objectives of Industrial Policy Statement of 1973
Curb concentration of economic power: Prevent large businesses from dominating markets.
Self-reliance: Reduce dependence on foreign technology and imports.
Balanced regional development: Encourage industrialization in less-developed areas.
Role of the public sector: Continued emphasis on the public sector in core industries.
Industrial Policy Statement of 1977
Context: Issued by the Janata Party government, emphasized a shift away from heavy industrialization
Key Focus: Promotion of small-scale, cottage industries and rural development
Small-Scale Industries Thrust of Industrial Policy Statement of 1977
“Tiny” Sector: Introduced as a new category for very small industries with investments below a certain level.
Reservation of Products: Expanded list of products exclusively reserved for small-scale industries.
District Industries Centers (DICs): Established as single-window agencies to provide support and services to small industries at the district level.
Restrictions on Large-Scale Industries of Industrial Policy Statement of 1977
Focus on Rural Needs: Large industries were discouraged from producing goods that could be made by small-scale units.
Location Restrictions: New large-scale industries could be set up away from urban areas to reduce regional imbalances.
Other Key features of Industrial Policy Statement of 1977
Labor-Intensive Technology: Emphasis on using technology that generated more employment opportunities.
Worker Participation: Encouragement of worker participation in the management of industries.
Focus on Consumer Goods: Increased attention to the production of essential consumer goods.
Industrial Policy of 1980
Emphasis on liberalization, efficiency, and modernization after a period of relatively slow industrial growth.
Key Features of the 1980 Industrial Policy
Easing Licensing Restrictions: Automatic expansion of capacity allowed for several industries to encourage production.
Delicensing: A list of industries was delicensed, making it easier to set up new businesses.
Raising Investment Limits: Increased investment ceiling for small and medium enterprises for larger projects.
Promotion of Exports: Focus on making Indian industries more competitive internationally.
Technological Upgradation: Emphasized the importance of modernizing technology.
Objectives of the Industrial Policy 1980
Increased Industrial Productivity: Aim to boost production and efficiency.
Optimal Resource Utilization: Focus on efficient and economic use of resources.
Higher Employment Generation: Creation of job opportunities.
Removal of Regional Disparities: Encouragement of industrial development in backward areas.
Consumer Protection: Priority to providing goods at fair prices.
Significance of the Industrial Policy 1980
Initial Steps Towards Liberalization: The 1980 policy started the process of easing regulations and marked a shift from the inward-looking policies of the past.
Controversial: Critics argued it favoured large businesses and ignored employment goals
Industrial Policy Resolutions (IPR) of 1985 & 1986
Context: Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi’s government initiated partial economic reforms within the existing framework.
Emphasis: Delicensing, deregulation, and a push towards technology modernization.
Key Features of IPR 1985 & IPR 1986
Delicensing: Several industries were delicensed, simplifying new business setup and expansion.
Broadbanding: Firms allowed to diversify production within broad product categories for flexibility.
Re-endorsement of Capacity: Automatic expansion of licensed capacity permitted under certain conditions, increasing production potential.
MRTP Asset Limits Revised: Increased asset threshold for companies falling under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act regulations, easing restrictions on large firms.
Additional Features of IPR 1985 & 1986
Minimum Economic Scale: Emphasized achieving minimum efficient production levels for competitiveness.
Import Liberalization: Easing access to imported technology and capital goods for modernization.
Infrastructure Development: Focus on improving infrastructure to support industrial growth.
Objectives of IPR 1985 & 1986
Boosting Productivity and Efficiency: Increase output and competitiveness of Indian industries.
Technological Modernization: Adopting newer technologies for improved production processes.
Generating Employment: Create more jobs through industrial growth.
Promoting Exports: Encouraging Indian industries to target the global market.
Significance of IPR 1985 & 1986
Stepping Stone to Liberalization: While not full-scale liberalization, these IPRs represented a shift towards a more open and market-oriented economy.
Paved the Way for 1991 Reforms: The 1985 & 1986 resolutions laid the groundwork for the more radical reforms undertaken in 1991.
Industrial Policy of 1991
Context: Drastic change brought on by a severe economic crisis, signaling a shift towards liberalization, privatization, and globalization (LPG reforms).
Key Architects: Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao and Finance Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh.
Major Changes Introduced in 1991
Dismantling the License Raj: Drastic reduction in industrial licensing requirements. Industries needed licenses only in a few sectors concerned with security, strategy, environmental, or social reasons.
Reducing Role of Public Sector: Disinvestment began, and many industries previously reserved for the public sector were opened to private investment.
FDI Encouragement: Increase in foreign investment limits (up to 51% in priority sectors), streamlining investment approval processes.
Additional Reforms in the 1991 Policy
Easing MRTP Restrictions: Loosening regulations for large corporations under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act.
Industrial Location Policy Liberalized: Companies gained more freedom in choosing where to set up industrial units.
Deregulation of the Financial Sector: Accompanied the industrial reforms, with steps towards making capital markets more robust.
Objectives of the 1991 Industrial Policy
Reviving Growth: Stimulate industrial growth and address the balance of payments crisis.
Efficiency and Competitiveness: Make Indian industry more efficient and internationally competitive.
Attract Foreign Capital and Technology: Boost technological upgradation and access to global markets.
Generate Employment: Address unemployment through renewed industrial growth.
Significance of the Industrial Policy of 1991
Watershed Moment: A significant departure from the past, ending decades of inward-looking policies.
Foundation of Modern Indian Economy: Paved the way for sustained economic growth and India’s integration into the global economy.
Controversies: The policy has critics who argue that it favored large businesses and increased socioeconomic inequality.
Special Economic Zones (SEZs)
Geographic regions within India that have economic laws more liberal than the country’s domestic laws.
Designed to attract foreign and domestic businesses by offering:
Duty-free imports and exports
Tax benefits
Simplified regulations
World-class infrastructure
Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in India - Established
Under the Special Economic Zones Act of 2005.