Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Philosophy > Inductive Arguments > Flashcards

Inductive Arguments Flashcards

1
Q

What is an inductive argument?

A

An argument based on an observation which develops into an assumption that the observation is a regular occurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a cosmological argument?

A

Observes and concludes that the best explanation for the universe is God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a teleological argument?

A

Observes the natural world and concludes that God is the designer and that the world has an end purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does ‘telos’ mean?

A

Purpose in Greek

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a posteriori knowledge?

A

Using knowledge derived from observation and experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Aquinas’ First Way?

A

Change - there must be an efficient cause which moves something from a state of potentiality into a state of actuality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What analogy does Aquinas use for the First Way?

A

A block of marble (potential) requires a sculptor (efficient cause) to become a statue (actual)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Aquinas’ work called?

A

Summa Theologica

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Aquinas’ Second Way?

A

Cause - there cannot be an infinite number of causes so there must be an uncaused cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the analogy for the Second Way?

A

The 1st domino (efficient cause) causes the 2nd domino (intermediate cause) to fall, leading the 3rd domino (ultimate cause) to fall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Aquinas’ Third Way?

A

Contingency - everything that exists is dependant on something else for existence, there must be something with a necessary existence on which everything else depends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where does the word ‘kalam’ originate?

A

Arabic ‘to argue’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Where does the Kalam Argument originate?

A

al-Ghazali, 12th Century Arabic thought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the 1993 Craig version of the Kalam argument?

A

There is no physical explanation for the cause of the universe so it must be a personal one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Craig argue about actual infinity?

A

It cannot exist and so neither can a beginningless temporal series of events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Craig’s library analogy?

A
  • a library has infinite books
  • it has infinite red books and infinite black books
  • therefore red books = total, and red + black is double the total
  • this is absurd
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is actual infinity?

A

Has no beginning and no end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is potential infinity?

A

Something that could become infinite with effort applied, e.g. numbers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is Aristotle’s Zeno’s Paradox?

A

If you break down movement into infinite tiny steps, you can never finish the steps and so will never get anywhere - infinity and movement aren’t compatible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are 3 strengths of cosmological arguments?

A
  1. It is easy to understand the concept of things not being able to cause themselves
  2. Infinity is inconceivable
  3. Simple and adaptable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are 3 weaknesses of cosmological arguments?

A
  1. Outdated by science
  2. Jumps from saying God ought to exist to saying he does exist
  3. Only helps people who already have faith
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are Kant’s 2 challenges to cosmological arguments?

A
  • It is wrong to assume the universe is part of a system of cause and effect
  • The concept of a necessary being is illogical and meaningless
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is Kenny’s challenge to cosmological arguments?

A

We can bring ourselves into a state of inertia so we do not needed an unmoved mover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is Russell’s fallacy of composition?

A

Something that applies to a part does not necessarily apply to the whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is Swinburne’s position on cosmological arguments?

A

The argument is an inference to the best explanation, making God more probable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What was William of Ockham’s view on cosmological arguments?

A

God is a matter of faith, not knowledge and it is possible the world had no beginning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

In what work did Hume challenge inductive arguments?

A

Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What are Hume’s 3 challenges to cosmological arguments?

A
  1. Cause and effect is an assumption, not a certainty
  2. We cannot question the universe as we have no experience of anything similar
  3. Just because everything in the universe has a cause does not mean the universe does
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

How does science challenge cosmological arguments?

A

The Big Bang theory suggests the universe originated from a random appearance of singularity

30
Q

What is Aquinas’ Fifth Way?

A

Something that lacks intelligence cannot move towards a fulfilling end unless something with intelligence moves it

31
Q

What is design qua regularity and what theory does it relate to?

A
  • Things that lack intelligence act with predictable regularity due to divine design
  • Aquinas’ Fifth Way
32
Q

What analogy relates to the Fifth Way?

A

An arrow (non-intelligent) cannot reach the target (end purpose) by itself, it must be directed by an archer (God)

33
Q

What was William Paley’s work and when was it written?

A
  • Natural Theology
  • 1802
34
Q

What is Paley’s teleological argument?

A
  • If a person sees a stone on a heath they can understand how it naturally came to be there
  • If they see a watch on a heath they must conclude it has been designed by an intelligent being, not by chance, and has been made for a purpose
35
Q

What is design qua purpose and what theory does it relate to?

A
  • Everything in the universe appears to have been designed to fulfil some purpose
  • Watchmaker analogy
36
Q

What were F.R. Tennant’s dates?

A

1866-1957

37
Q

What is the anthropic argument?

A

The world has been designed in such a way that is perfect for human life

38
Q

What is the aesthetic argument?

A

The beauty in the world is not functionally necessary therefore must be the creation of a benevolent God

39
Q

What are 3 strengths of the teleological argument?

A
  1. There is observable evidence of the efficient processes of the world
  2. The universe appears adapted to suit human beings
  3. Everything appears purposeful
40
Q

What are 3 weaknesses of the teleological argument?

A
  1. There is no evidence to suggest the universe needs a designer
  2. J.S. Mill argues there is an abundance of bad design and flaws in the world
  3. Evidence of design does not necessarily point to the God of Classical Theism
41
Q

What are 3 of Hume’s challenges to the teleological argument?

A
  1. Assuming governing intelligence is not inductive evidence
  2. This world could be a work of an apprentice God who has gone on to design better
  3. Comparing the universe to a machine is of no more use than comparing it to a carrot
42
Q

How does Darwin’s work challenge the teleological argument?

A

Evolution suggests the appearance of order emerges from underlying processes which are random and unpredictable

43
Q

How does Dawkins challenge the teleological argument?

A

A watchmaker has precise intentions whereas natural selection is unconscious and unpredictable

44
Q

How does Lovelocks’ Gaia Hypothesis challenge the teleological argument?

A

Sees the world as a self regulating process. maintaining life without need for external influence

45
Q

Challenges to teleological arguments are effective:

A
  1. Using human experience to conjure analogies for God is insufficient evidence (Hume)
  2. There is no evidence of intention
  3. Teleological arguments are outdated and unnecessary in the modern age
46
Q

Challenges to teleological arguments are ineffective:

A
  1. Science can be used in support or denial or teleological arguments, leaving it to personal preference
  2. Contemporary scientists such as Polkinghorne support the design concept
  3. Scientific theories are equally as fallible
47
Q

Cosmological arguments are effective in the 21st Century:

A
  1. They answer why the universe was began, not just how
  2. Additional dimension of faith provides a personal element of hope and comfort
  3. A posteriori evidence gives the argument a scientific basis
48
Q

Cosmological arguments are ineffective in the 21st Century:

A
  1. Disproved by Big Bang theory and quantum mechanics
  2. Aquinas flawed by 1st Law of Motion
  3. Cosmological arguments originated 2,500 in ancient Greek philosophy
49
Q

How does Newton’s 1st Law of Motion challenge Aquinas?

A

Inertia replaces the need for an unmoved mover

50
Q

Scientific explanations are more persuasive than philosophical:

A
  1. Science is based in rational empiricism
  2. Quantum physics suggests that, at a sub-atomic level, a cause and effect understanding is not necessarily relevant
  3. Science is easily and widely accepted, not subject to faith or culture
51
Q

Scientific explanations are not more persuasive than philosophical:

A
  1. It is not possible to disprove God
  2. Science cannot comment on anything before the Big Bang, leaving a gap for a creator
  3. Philosophy is often more accessible and persuasive
52
Q

Teleological arguments are effective:

A
  1. Discoverable to the casual observer
  2. Rationally explains complexity with design and intention
  3. Denies the unlikely possibility of coincidence
53
Q

Teleological arguments are ineffective:

A
  1. Do flaws suggest and inept creator?
  2. Dawkins argued it promotes a childish world view
  3. It is arrogant to claim we can understand the ways of the universe
54
Q

The Kalam argument is convincing:

A
  1. Scientific information supports the notion of a finite universe
  2. Rationally fits in with theistic interpretations of creation
  3. Contemporary views agree on a starting point
55
Q

The Kalam argument is not convincing:

A
  1. Pointless arguing theistically about a finite universe as it is already supported atheistically
  2. The need for a cause is not supported empirically
  3. Contradictorily states that infinity is impossible but God is infinite
56
Q

Inductive arguments are effective:

A
  1. A posteriori and synthetic bases them in accessible evidence
  2. Universal and testable
  3. Allows for the possibility of more than one correct answer
57
Q

Inductive arguments are ineffective:

A
  1. Easily challenged by alternative evidence
  2. Possible to accept the evidence but deny its conclusions
  3. Premises do not lead to definite conclusions
58
Q

Fallacy of Composition - Russell

A

‘Just because every human has a mother does not mean the whole of humanity has a mother’

59
Q

Watchmaker - Dawkins

A

‘The only watchmaker in nature is the blind forces of physics’

60
Q

First Way - Aquinas

A

‘If that by which it is put in motion be itself put in motion, then this also must be put in motion by another’

61
Q

Second Way - Aquinas

A

‘There is no case known in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself; for so it would be prior to itself which is impossible’

62
Q

Third Way - Aquinas

A

‘there must exist something the existence of which is necessary’

63
Q

Fifth Way - Aquinas

A

‘some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God’

64
Q

Watchmaker - Paley

A

‘the contrivances of nature surpass the contrivances of art, in the complexity, subtlety, and curiosity of the mechanism’

65
Q

Anthropic principle - Tennant

A

‘the multitude of interwoven adaptations by which the world is constituted… ought but purposive intelligence’

66
Q

Kalam argument - Craig

A

‘the creator of the universe must be a personal being who freely chooses to create the world’

67
Q

Challenge - Russell

A

‘I would say the universe is just there and that’s all’

68
Q

Where does the word ‘anthropic’ derive from?

A

Greek ‘anthropos’ meaning human being

69
Q

What was Tennant one of the first philosophers to do?

A

Put forward a design argument in reference to evolution

70
Q

What was Tennant’s work and when was it written?

A
  • ‘Philosophical Theology’
  • 1928

Philosophy (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions