Individualistic Theories Flashcards

1
Q

Describe psycho analysis theory by Freud

A

It was originally founded by Sigmund Freud (1856-1939).
Freud stated that our early childhood experiences determine our future
behaviour. In his view ‘the child is father to the man’
.
In particular, our early experiences determine whether we will go on to
act in anti-social ways.
Freud states that there are three elements to the human personality:
The id: located in the unconscious, instinctive, ‘animal’ part of the mind.
It contains powerful, selfish, pleasure-seeking needs and drives, such as
the desire for sex, food and sleep. The id is governed by the ‘pleasure principle’
- the blind desire to satisfy its urges at any cost.
If we acted on these urges whenever we felt them, they would often lead
to antisocial and criminal behaviour.
The superego: contains our conscience or moral rules. We learn these
through interactions with our parents during early socialisation in the
family. For example, we might be punished for trying to satisfy our urges
without regard for others.
Through socialisation, the child internalises its parents’ ideas of right and
wrong, and the superego develops as a sort of ‘nagging parent’
.
If we act - or consider acting - against the superego, we feel guilt and
anxiety.
The ego: Freud saw our behaviour as the result of the struggle between
the id and superego.
The ego’s role is to try to strike a balance between their conflicting
demands. It is driven by the ‘reality principle’
- it learns from experience
(that in the real world, actions have consequences).
The ego seeks to control the id’s urges whilst finding a way to balance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does psychoanalysis relate to crime

A

A weakly developed superego means the individual will feel less guilt
about antisocial behaviour and less inhibition about acting on the id’s
selfish or aggressive urges
A too harsh and unforgiving superego creates deep seated guilt feelings
in the individual, who then craves punishment as a release from these
feelings. They may engage in compulsive repeat offending behaviour to
be punished
A deviant superego is one where a child is successfully socialised, but
into a deviant moral code. A son may have a perfectly good relationship
with his criminal father and so he internalises his father’s criminal values.
As a result, his superego would not inflict guilt feelings on him for
contemplating criminal acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evaluate Freud theory

A

Strengths:

The theory points to the
importance of early childhood and family relationships in understanding criminal behaviour.
Psychoanalytic explanations have had some influence on policies for dealing with crime and deviance. Psychoanalytic explanations have had some influence on policies for dealing with crime and deviance.
Weaknesses:

Psychoanalytic explanations are unscientific and subjective – they rely on accepting the psychoanalyst’s claim that they see into the workings of the individual’s unconscious mind to discover their inner conflicts and motivation.

Psychodynamic theories of offending are no longer accredited by psychologists due to the difficulty of testing concepts such as the unconscious mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe bowlbys maternal deprivation theory

A

Bowlby argues there is a link between maternal deprivation and deviant /
anti-social behaviour.
In his view, the child needs a close, continuous relationship with its
primary carer (Bowlby assumed this would be the mother) up to the age
of 5 in order to develop normally.
If the mother-child attachment is broken through separation (even for a
short period of time) it can leave the child unable to form meaningful
emotional relationships with others.
This is ‘affectionless psychopathy’ and can lead to criminal behaviour.
Evidence: Bowlby based his theory on a study of 44 juvenile thieves
who had been referred to a child guidance clinic.
39% of these had suffered maternal deprivation before the age of 5.
With the control group of non-delinquents, only 5% had.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluate bowlbys theory

A

Strengths:

Bowlby’s research showed that more of
his sample of 44 juvenile delinquents
had suffered maternal deprivation
(39%) than control groups of
non-delinquents (5%)
His work shows the need to consider
the role of parent – child relationships in explaining criminality
Weaknesses:
was a retrospective study, where delinquents and their mothers had to accurately recall past events. This can be a problem, especially if it involves recalling emotive experience

Bowlby’s own later study of 60
children who had been separated
from their parents for a long
period before they were 5, found
no evidence of ‘affectionless
psychopathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe sutherlands differential associations theory

A

Edwin Sutherland argues that individuals learn criminal behaviour
largely in the family and peer groups (inc work groups).
It is the result of two factors:
Imitation of criminal acts: individuals can acquire criminal skills and
techniques through observing those around them.
Learned attitudes: socialisation within the group exposes the
individual to attitudes and values about the law (some favourable,
some unfavourable). If they learn more unfavourable attitudes and
values, they are more likely to become criminals.
E.g. Sutherland studied white collar crime and found that group
attitudes in the workplace often normalised criminal behaviour (e.g.
‘everyone is doing it’), making it easier for individuals to justify it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluate sutherlands theory

A

Strengths:

Farrington (1995) investigated
anti-social behaviour in 411 men in
London and found that approximately
45% went on to commit crime.
Farrington identified that crime in the
family was one of the several
common traits. Therefore, this study
suggests that exposure to criminal
attitudes and behaviour does influence people to commit crime.

Matthews found that juvenile
delinquents are more likely to have
friends who commit antisocial acts,
suggesting that they learn their behaviour from peer groups.
Weaknesses:

Farrington (1995) also suggested that
poverty and low educational
achievement were key factors in the
study and played a part in criminality

Not everyone who is exposed to
‘criminal influences’ becomes a
criminal. They might learn from family
and peers how to commit crime, but
never put this into practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the moral development theory kohl berg

A

is relevant to understanding criminals’ thinking.
Kohlberg argues our ideas of right and wrong develop through a
series of levels and stages from childhood to adulthood.
At the preconventional or pre-moral level, young children define right
and wrong simply in terms of what brings punishment or rewards.
By adulthood, our ideas of right and wrong involve an understanding
of underlying moral principles and values.
This therefore suggests that criminals’ moral development is stuck at
a less mature level than everybody else. They are likely to think solely
in terms of whether their actions will lead to a reward or punishment,
rather than how it might affect others. This makes them more likely to
offend.
Cognitive behavioural therapy: cognitive theories that see delinquents’
thought patterns as different from those of normal people have led to
a range of treatments for offenders. These come under the general heading of CBT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluation of kholberg moral development theory

A

Strengths:
- Some studies show delinquents are more likely to have immature moral development
Thornton and Reid found the theory to be truer for cries such as theft and robbery (which may involve reasoning) rather thancrimes of violence
Weaknesses:

Kohlberg focuses on moral thinking, rather than moral behaviour. Someone may perfectly capable of thinking morally whilst actingimmorally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly