Individual differences (Intelligence and Personality) Flashcards
Bacon topic
What do psychologists mean by individual differences?
- study of variation in human behaviour
- latent constructs such as personality and intelligence which underlie variation
- human universals - what is generally true of human nature
- individual differences - how do groups of people differ from one another
- individual uniqueness - how can we explain this
- personality and intelligence
what is personality?
a tendency to show consistent patterns of thoughts, feelings and actions (McCrae & Costa, 1990)
what are personality traits?
an individuals characteristic pattern of thought, emotion and behaviour, together with the psychological mechanisms, hidden or not behind those patterns (Funder, 1997)
how did the trait theory develop?
- allport, denotes the lexical hypothesis: socially relevant personality characteristics encoded in natural language.
- 17,953 trait words from English dictionary/language and classified them into groups of characteristics
- cardinal traits: dominant & influence every aciton
- central traits: key traits which sum up personality but more limited to situation than cardinal
- secondary traits: preferences which are highly situation specific
what did Raymond Cattle develop?
Cattell aimed to develop a more formal taxonomy, used a large sample of adults rated on traits from natural language using experimental and questionnaire data
how does Cattles development support trait theory?
used factor analysis to determine which traits were correlated with each other, it is a way of reducing data and making it more manageable.
what did Cattles development conclude?
concluded that 15 factors accounted for most of personality, plus an additional factor like intelligence.
what are the 16 personality factors?
the 16 pf questionnaire was a sale of trait dimensions. from low to high, low being: reserved, detached, sober or shy and high being: outgoing, warm-hearted, calm and cheerful.
what are the five factors of the five factor model?
- Openness to experience
- Conscientousness
- Extraversion
- Agreeableness -
- Neuroticism
what is meant by openness to experience?
receptive to new ideas & change
what is meant by conscientiousness?
degree of self-discipline and control, it is the will to achieve
what is meant by extraversion?
sociability, quantity and intensity of interpersonal relationships and interactions
what is meant by agreeableness?
quality of social interaction if high A: trusting, helpful, warm-hearted, sympathetic
what is meant by neuroticism?
emotional stability and personal adjustment
how can personality traits be measured?
questionnaires, e.g. use the big five and Neo personality inventory
what is the NEO PIR?
NEO personality inventory, composed of 240 questions, 48 for each of the big 5 dimensions. response made on 5 point scale and takes 30-40 mins to complete.
what is the evidence for the 5 factor theory?
- fits well with other measures of personality like the Myers-briggs type inventory.
- predictive utility e.g. C and job performance
- heritability studies
- cross-cultural agreement: trait descriptors in natural languages.
why are trait theories useful?
- if we can describe somebody’s personality in terms of their trait scores on questionnaires
- enables us to quantify personality
what are limitations to trait theories?
- how many factors should be included
- correlational - causation can we assume associated biological variables
- descriptive, rather than explanatory: are traits real or just convenient communicative devices?
but how many traits of personality are there?
proposed Big 7, by Almagor et al 1995:
HEXACO model (6) proposed by Ashton & Lee 2005
big 2 proposed by digman 1997
big 1 - Musek 2007, general factor of personality is the combination of stability and plasticity.
eyesencks biological model
What are the big 7 proposed by Almagor et al 1995?
positive emotionality, negative emotionality, dependability, agreeability, conventionality, positive valence, and negative valence
what composes the HEXACO model by Ashton & Lee, 2005?
- honesty-humility
- emotionality
- extraversion
- agreeableness
- conscientiousness
- openness to experience
what are the big 2 proposed by digman 1997?
emotional stability and extraversion
what is the big 1 proposed by Mulek 2007?
general factor of personality is the combination of stability and plasticity.
what is eyesencks biological model?
we have a heritable ability to learn and adapt to the environment
based on biological factors
based on eyesencks observations and linked the response to create categories: psychoticism, extraversion and neuroticism.
what is psychoticism associated to?
with testosterone levels - high, more aggressive and low caring, considerate
what is extraversion associated to?
on cortical arousal - high under aroused and bored, low over aroused
what is neuroticism associated to?
level of reactivity in limbic system/amygdala - high, stress reactivity and low, lower stress.
what did Shields, 1976 find in evidence to eyesencks biological model?
- shields 1976 found that monozygotic twins were significantly more alike on the introvert-extrovert and psychoticism dimensions than dizygotic twins.
- only 50% of the variations of scores on personality dimensions are due to inherited traits → suggests social factors are important.
what model supports stability for personality traits?
research pointing towards the big five: Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Neuroticism.
why does the big five support stability for personality traits?
useful as it is quick to administer and free, as it only has 40 items compared to the NEO!
but is has no data on individual sub facets!
but how stable is personality over time and situation?
- cross sectional consistency
- longitudinal consistency
- life stages and personality change
- life roles amplify early dispositions
what is cross sectional consistency?
there’s variation across context and situation.
the person situation debate:
- trait theories emphasise consistency
- social cognitive theories emphasise agency and role of context
- debate as to whether personality is trait driven, or whether context also is important.
what are the social cognitive explanations for the person situation debate?
- Social cognitive theories assume personal agency (Bandura)
- an intentional doer selecting, constructing and regulating one’s own activity to realise certain outcomes.
- Bandura worked on the SC theory of learning, behaviour and personality.key elements are agency & person environment interaction, with the triadic reciprocal causation. learning, expectancies and self-efficacy switch between the behaviour, person and environment of a situation.
what are types of environments occur in the person situation debate?
- Imposed: put up with it whether like it or not but can control how contrue & react to it
- selected: associates, activities etc which we select by our life choices and behaviours
- constructed: through generative effort, how we socially construct environment through our perception of the world and associated actions.
what did research in the person situation debate study and find?
Mischel observed boys at Summer camp over 6 weeks and looked at their behavioural signature and found behaviour is situational and varies as we interact with the world.
SCT emphasises importance of personal agency and interaction with environment of social context. ‘the capacity to exercise control over the nature and quality of ones life is the essence of humanness’
summarise the person situation debate
- aggregation across many situations and can’t predict single actions or from single actions
- most now subscribe to interactionist approach as both internal traits and situations interact in producing behaviour.
- stable dispositions
what does longitudinal consistency focus on?
are people stable in their trait characteristics over lifetime?
William James 1890, proposed that it is well for the world that in most of us, by the age of 30, the character has set like plaster and will never soften again.
but trait theorists have different thoughts:
- hard plaster hypothesis.
- soft plaster hypothesis