Incorporation & Corporate Personality Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a promoter? What duty do they have and the consequences of a breach?

A

A promoter = someone involved in business operations familiar to the commercial world by which a company is brought into existence - unless involved by virtue of their professional duties e.g. solicitors or accountants

Have a fiduciary duty = can’t make a secret profit
Unless they disclose to independent persons the nature of the transaction and profit made

Breach = transaction becomes voidable at the company’s instance and promoter may account to the company for profit gained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a pre-incorporation contract? How is s.51 different from common law? When does s.51 not apply? When are promoters not liable? Can promoter enforce a pre-incorporation contract?

A

= a contract made by promoter on behalf of an unformed company
Companies have no contractual capacity until the company exists

Under common law, whether the promoter was bound by a pre-incorporation contract depended on the intention of the parties as evidenced in the contract

S.51 CA2006 changes this = a promoter who enters a pre-incorporation contract with a 3rd party will be bound by the contract and is personally liable (unless agreed otherwise)
= 3rd parties can enforce the contract

Doesn’t apply where:

  1. A promoter makes a contract before buying an off the shelf company which exists at the time the contract is made
  2. The company once existed but has since been dissolved

Promoter not liable if ‘agreed otherwise’ = the agreement must be explicit and the parties must have intended to exclude s.51

Braymist Ltd v Wise Finance Co Ltd [2002] = promoters can enforce the pre-incorporation contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Upon incorporation what can the company not do? (2)
What are the 2 ways a company becomes bound by the pre-incorporation contract?
When may novation be inferred?

A

Company cannot adopt or ratify a pre-incorporation contract.

  1. A term in the pre-incorporation contract states that upon incorporation the promoter is no longer liable if the company contracts with the 3rd party to the same terms
  2. Novation = following incorporation, it’s agreed to discharge the pre-incorporation contract and a new contract will be entered into between the company and 3rd party

Novation will not occur because a company acts on the pre-incorporation contract as if it were bound.
Novation may be inferred based on the conduct of the parties, e.g. if company and 3rd party agree to modify the terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 3 ways to incorporate an unregistered company? Does the CA2006 apply to these companies?

A
  1. By Royal Charter
  2. By Act of Parliament
  3. By delegation of authority

CA2006 doesn’t apply to unregistered companies
s.1043 CA2006 = The Secretary of State can pass regulations to extend CA2006 provisions to cover unregistered companies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What 3 documents must be delivered to CH to incorporate a registered company?

A

S.9(1) CA2006 = to incorporate a company must deliver 3 documents to CH:

  1. Memorandum of association
    Persons wishing to incorporate a company must subscribe their names to the memorandum
    s.112(1) CA2006 = then become the company’s first members upon incorporation
    Memorandum must state that the subscribers:
  2. wish to form a company under CA2006
  3. Agree to become members of the company
  4. To take at least 1 share each if company has share capital
  5. The application for registration and accompanying documents (Form IN01):
  6. The statement of compliance
    • = states that the CA2006 registration requirements have been complied with
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 9 things the application to incorporate a registered company must include?

A

S.9(2) CA2006 = application must include:

  1. Public or private
  2. Unlimited or limited - shares or guarantee
  3. Name
  4. Registered office
  5. Statement of capital and initial shareholdings (or statement of guarantee)
  6. Proposed officers
  7. Statement of significant control
  8. Copy of Articles of Association (unless adopting the model articles)
  9. Company type and intended business activities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 7 rules for the proposed name of the company?

A
  1. s.58 CA2006 = public limited company = plc
  2. S.59 CA2006 = private limited company = ltd
  3. S.66 CA2006 = prohibited from using the same name as an existing company listed on the CH index
    S.67 CA2006 = the Secretary of State can order the company to change the name if they deem it the same or too similar
  4. S.216 IA1986 = prohibited name is:
    1. A name a liquidating company was known by during previous 12 months or;
    2. A name which is similar and suggests an association with that company
  5. S.53 CA2006 = name mustn’t be registered if the Secretary of State deem the name offensive or use of the name would constitute an offence
  6. Mustn’t contain words or phrases that are protected by a trademark or would infringe the intellectual property rights of others
  7. S.54 and 55 CA2006 = Secretary of State must grant permission if name suggests connection with a governmental body or contains sensitive words/expressions such as ‘British’ or ‘NHS’
    • Approval for word ‘insurance’ = FCA
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How is a registered company registered? (2 steps)
What will the registrar do? (3)
What 3 things happen from the date of registration?
What does a public company also require? When will this be issued?

A
  1. Submit documents to Registrar of Companies in country the RO is based who will approve if completed properly and company purpose is not unlawful
  2. Pay registration fee

s.15 CA2006 = the registrar will register the documents, allocate the company a registration number, and issue a certificate of incorporation
Certificate = conclusive evidence of compliance with CA2006 registration requirements

From the date of registration:

  1. company has separate legal personality
  2. Subscribers become members
  3. directors and secretaries appointed as officers

Public companies must apply for a trading certificate
Doing business without = criminal offence
CH will issue only if company satisfies the minimal capital requirements
Plc may be wound up if no trading certificate after a year of incorporation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is an off the shelf company? What is an advantage? What is a disadvantage?

A

= purchasing an existing company
Incorporation agents’ specialise in creating and selling companies so register a company and leave it dormant until purchased
When bought, the agent will transfer the company to the purchaser and notify CH of the relevant changes

Advantage = can obtain a company quickly and inexpensively, no length registration

Disadvantage = may not meet the exact needs of the purchaser

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the difference between a certificate of incorporation and a trading certificate?

A

Certificate of incorporation = issued to company upon incorporation

Trading certificate = issued to public companies only
Cannot commence any business or exercise borrowing powers until it has one
Only issued if CH is satisfied the additional plc registration requirements have been complied with e.g. minimum share capital
Minimum share capital = £50,000 or the prescribed euro equivalent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the difference between a person and an individual?

A

‘person’ = natural person or legal person (body corporate) e.g. companies and LLPs

‘individual’ = natural persons only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 7 consequences of corporate personality:

A
  1. Has a nationality, domicile, and residence
  2. Has contractual capacity
  3. Has perpetual succession
  4. Can own assets
  5. Has its own business separate to directors/members
  6. Can commence and defend legal proceedings
  7. Gains ‘Human Rights’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe the case of SALOMON V A SALOMON & CO LTD 1897

A

• Salomon formed a limited company to take over his boot-making business.
• He, his wife, and their 5 children took 1 share each.
• The company paid £39,000 to Salomon for the business including £10,000 in debentures secured by a floating charge over the assets, making Salomon a secured creditor
• The business later went into liquidation and Salomon was paid first over the unsecured creditors, who then went unpaid.
• The liquidator stated that Salomon should be personally liable for the company’s debts and the High court agreed holding that Salomon was the Company’s agent
• Court of Appeal agreed Salomon was liable on the grounds that the company was not formed in accordance with the Companies Act - the other members were not genuine active members
However, the House of Lords disagreed, and Salomon was not liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What 3 things did the courts recognise in Salomon v Salomon?

A
  1. A validly incorporated company can legitimately be used to shield its members from the liability for the company’s debts.
  2. A ‘one-person company’ is valid i.e., a company can be run by one person with serval dormant nominee shareholders.
  3. An agency relationship or trusteeship is not established simply because someone holds shares in a company
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When will the courts lift the corporate veil? What are the 3 methods?

A

Courts will disregard corporate personality where:

  1. Statute provides it is to be disregarded
  2. A person is under an existing legal obligation, liability, or restriction , which they deliberately evade or frustrate by interposing a company under their control and all other remedies are no assistance

Methods:
1. By statute
2. By common law
3. By contract - Where a member or director contractually agrees to be liable for the company’s debts or liabilities
○ i.e. creditors lending money to a smaller business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are 5 examples of when statute will lift the veil?

A
  1. s.767 CA2006 = Where a public company does business without a trading certificate
  2. s.993 CA2006 = Where a person has engaged in fraudulent trading
  3. s.214 and 246ZB = Where a person has engaged in wrongful trading
  4. s.399 and 404 CA2006 = Where a parent company fails to prepare consolidated accounts for the group (s.399 and 404 CA2006)
  5. s.238 IA1986 = Where a person enters into a transaction at an undervalue
17
Q

What are 4 examples when common law will lift the veil?

A
  1. When company is a sham, perpetrating fraud, or evading some form of legal obligation (Guildford Motor Co Ltd v Horne [1933])
  2. When there is a relationship of agency and the principal (parent) is liable for the acts of their agent (subsidiary) (Smith, Stone and Knight Ltd v Birmingham Corporation [1939])
  3. When there is a duty of care owed (Chandler v Cape Industries plc [2012]) = Courts didn’t lift the veil but the parent company had assumed responsibility of subsidiary so did have to pay damages
  4. Where the evasion principle applies
18
Q

Explain the case of Petrodel Resources Ltd v Prest 2013

A

• Ms Prest appealed to the court for relief following her divorce from Mr Prest
• His assets were tied up in companies that he solely controlled so the High Court lifted the veil and exercised s.24 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 ordering him to pay £17.5 million to Ms Prest
• He appealed and the Court of Appeal stated the veil should not be lifted in this way
• Ms Prest appealed and the Supreme Court refused to lift the veil
○ Lord Sumption: only 1 instance where veil is lifted = where a person is under an existing legal obligation, liability, or restriction, which they deliberately evade or frustrate by interposing a company under their control
○ = the evasion principle = courts lift the veil
○ Anything else = concealment principle = courts look behind veil not lift

19
Q

What are the 3 conditions that must be satisfied for the evasion principle to apply?

A
  1. There must be an existing legal obligation, liability, or restriction placed upon person (X)
    ○ Yukong Line Ltd Case [1998] = obligation placed upon company X worked for and not X himself = veil wasn’t lifted
    ○ Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne [1933] = Horne had a personal obligation to not solicit any of Guildford Motor’s clients = veil lifted
  2. X must interpose a company to evade or frustrate the obligation, liability, or restriction
    ○ Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne [1933] = Horne’s wife set up a competing company
  3. The company being interposed by X must be under X’s control
    ○ Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne 1933 = Horne wasn’t a member of the competing company but controlled it through wife
20
Q

What are the 4 forms of liability?

A
  1. Personal liability
  2. Strict liability
  3. Vicarious liability
  4. Liability imposed via attribution
21
Q

What are the 2 types of civil personal liability? When will a director be liable for the 2nd type? Can personal liability occur in criminal cases?

A

Civil Liability:
1. Contractually liable
• Company can be liable for breach of contract
• Agency law = company usually contractually liable for the acts of those who act on its behalf
○ Agents aren’t liable on the contracts between the company and 3rd parties, the company is

  1. Tortious Liability
    • A company is vicariously liable for acts of its director, employees, and agents
    • C Evans & Sons Ltd v Spritebrand Ltd [1985] = a director who commits a tort when acting for the company will not be liable unless:
    1. He engaged in the tort in a personal capacity; and
    2. He had satisfied the requirements of the tort

Criminal Liability:
• Statute will identify who can be convicted of the offence in question
• In company law offences usually both company and persons who caused the company to commit the offence can be convicted
• S.1(1) Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 = company guilty of corporate manslaughter if its activities cause a person’s death, and amounts to a gross breach of a duty of care owed to the deceased

22
Q

Does strict liability occur in civil and criminal cases? What needs to be established for strict liability to occur?
What is an example?

A
  • Occurs in civil and criminal cases
  • Company has no mind and mental state i.e. can’t act with malice or recklessly
  • All that needs to be established is that the prohibited act or omission was engaged in
  • e.g. s.248 CA2006 = requires all board minutes must be recorded and failure = every person in default commits an offence
23
Q

What is vicarious liability in civil cases? What 3 conditions must be satisfied to impose vicarious liability for a civil wrong? Can vicarious liability be imposed in criminal cases?

A

Civil Liability:
• Involves a situation where one person is liable for the acts or omissions of another person e.g. Director or employee acting on behalf of the company commits a tortious act and company is vicariously liable

To impose vicarious liability for civil wrong, 3 requirements must be satisfied:

  1. There must be an employer/employee relationship or relationship of agency
  2. The employee or agent must have committed a tort
  3. The tort must have been committed in the course of employee’s employment or agent’s agency

Criminal Liability:
• Vicarious liability can be imposed if a statute provides that a company can be liable for the criminal acts of others

24
Q

What is identification theory? How is a company’s directing mind and will determined?
What about in civil cases?

A

• Identification theory = the state of mind or knowledge of certain persons (e.g. directors) can be attributed to the company

  • A company’s directing mind and will = determined by the company’s constitution
  • If articles vest managerial powers to the directors, they will constitute a company’s directing mind and will = their state of mind/knowledge can be attributed to the company
  • Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v Securities Commission [1995] = the person who, with the authority of the company, acquired the relevant interest is the person whose knowledge is attributed
    • Accepted approach in civil cases
    • For criminal cases, courts first apply the directing mind and will test