Implant technology - unit 1 deck 3 Flashcards
Recall that the amount of load transfer from bone to implant or vice versa in a load transfer region depends on the relative loads taken by them in the load sharing region; and this in turn depends on their relative rigidities.
In a load sharing region state the relationship used to calculate the load taken by the bone and that of the implant
In the load sharing region when an implant is inplace state the equation used to calculate the total load taken by the bone
Let us consider load transfer under a bending load.
Using as an example the cross section of the bone in Figure 6 and assuming a perfectly fitting circular stem (i.e. with a diameter of 18 mm), the relative rigidities can be calculated using the formula above for I for circular shafts:
Re-arrange end bit to equal LBONE = 0.4 LTOTAL
What is meant by rigidity?
Rigidity is the stiffness of the cross section of a material. It is similar to structural stiffness but ignores the length of the structure. It is a particularly useful quantity for calculating the loads taken by a bone and an implant in a load sharing region
What are the two factors affecting the rigidity of a structure?
Material stiffness and a geometrical property of the cross section. Axial rigidity = EA; Bending rigidity = EI and Torsional rigidity = GJ.
What is the ratio of the bending rigidity of an 11 mm diameter and a 10 mm diameter intramedullary nail given the following information:
both are made from stainless steel both have a wall thickness of 1 mm.
Note that if you refer to page 16 and the pic of the hollow circles they have a thickness of 1mm walls but that equates to a 2mm difference in outer and inner diameter
Referring to Figure 2B, will a stiff stem give more or less stress shielding of bone in Region 1, than a less stiff stem? Explain why.
The stiffer stem gives a greater degree of stress shielding in Region 1. This can be explained as follows.
In the load sharing region, Region 2, the stiffer implant takes more load than the less stiff one because it is more rigid relative to bone. This means that less load will be transferred from the stem to the bone in Region 1 for the stiff implant, i.e. the bone in Region 1 takes less load and is therefore more stress shielded.
Most orthopaedic implants are designed to be fixed to bone, what is the contact area between the fixator and the bone is known as ?
The bone-implant interface
What are the requirements for the bone-implant interface and what is the potential consequence if this is not ensured?
The interface must remain fixed and free from movement, otherwise the implant will loosen and probably fail.
. Fixation of an implant can be achieved using different methods, what is the main factor determining the method used?
By whether or not the implant is intended to be removed at a later date
How are fracture fixators usually held in place and do they end up getting removed or not?
They are mostly intended for temporary implantation and are held in by screws, which can be undone and the fixator removed after the bone has healed
How long are joint replacements intended on being inplace and therefore what should be avoided?
They are intended to be implanted permanently so loosening, which is the main cause of failure, must be avoided
Screws have a wide variety of uses in the fixation of orthopaedic devices, especially fracture fixators, what is the advantages of using screws over nuts and bolts?
- Screw attachment requires access from one side of a bone only, whereas a nut and bolt combination must be accessed from both sides of the hole - one for the bolt, the other for the nut ==> Using a bolt, therefore, involves more trauma to tissues
- The heads of nuts and bolts tend to project more than the head of a screw. This can create practical problems if there is only a small distance from the bone to the skin‟s surface, such as in the case of the interior part of the tibia. Nuts and bolts are used very rarely for attaching implants to bone.
What does the success of using interference fit implant fixation rely on ?
This fixation technique requires no specific fixation device but relies instead on a tight contact between implant and bone, surface friction between the two materials preventing movement at the interface. The surface shapes must match well if this method of fixation is to work well, otherwise there is a considerable risk of loosening or of the stem sinking into the bone
How is the tight contact between implant and bone achieved when using interference fit implant fixation ?
The dimensions of the inner component are slightly larger than those of the outer component, and the implant is pressed into the bone to lessen the risk of loosening. Using a tapered stem allows it to push outwards on the bone, preventing excessive subsidence if the interference fit is not adequate