Implant Second Stage Surgery Flashcards
Single Stage Surgery
Transmucosal opening created at time of placement ADVANTAGE: Only one surgical procedure required DISADVANTAGE: Less predictable augmentation
Two Stage
Implant submerged under mucosa for duration of healing time
ADVANTAGES
- Primary wound closure
Osseointegration allowed to occur in a sterile, stress-free environment
-Form and amount of remaining hard and soft tissues can be influenced during second stage procedure
Timing of second stage surgery
Type I/II Bone 3-4 months
Type III/IV Bone 6-8 months
GBR at stage I 6-8 months
Fixtures in sinus 6-8 months
Objectives of stage two surgery
Expose submerged implant without damaging surrounding bone Evaluate for integration Control thickness of both hard and soft tissue surrounding implant Preserve or create keratinized tissue around implant Facilitate oral hygiene and implant maintenance Remove cover screw, Ensure proper transepithelial Abutment seating Preserve phonetics and esthetics
3 types of second stage surgical techniques
EXCISIONAL: Punch Technique INCISIONAL: Full Thickness Flap COMBINATION
DETERMINING FACTORS for 2nd stage TECHNIQUE SELECTION
- Need to access osseous structures
- Thickness of overlying soft tissue
- Amount of keratinized tissue
- Available healing time
- Need to control abutment length
- Patient’s ability to perform oral hygiene
- Esthetic considerations
- Thickness of bone surrounding implant
Ways to do Punch technique
Surgical Blade
Punch
Rotary
Laser
Steps of punch technique
- Locate and expose cover screw
- Remove cover screw
- Seat Abutment
- Take Radiograph to assess seating
Excisional Punch Technique Advantages
Quick and easy
Minimal morbidity
Less healing time required
Avoids exposing bone
Excisional Punch Technique Disadvantages
Locating fixture may be difficult
Possible problems seating abutment
No control over abutment length
May sacrifice existing keratinized tissue
Can’t address hard/soft tissue problems
minimum wait time before restorations
likely 4 weeks but depends on case. 2 weeks mentioned in class but then backtracked
Incisional Tech: Full Thickness Flap advantages
Keratinized tissue maintained
Control of final hard/soft tissue architecture of area
Abutment height can be altered
Visualization of abutment seating assures precise fit
Incisional Tech: Full Thickness Flap disadvantages
Increased morbidity
Longer healing time required
Bone surrounding implant is exposed May cause F or L bony dehiscence
Interproximal bone can remain denuded
Advantages of keratinized tissue
- Facilitates making of impression
- Tissues less likely to collapse over implant
- Facilitates maintenance procedures
- May be more resistant to hygiene trauma
- Provides greater tissue tone around
abutment - Esthetic blending possible in maxillary
- Epithelial implant junction may be more
resistant - Horizontal connective tissue fiber orientation
(perpendicular arrangement)
Types of soft tissue augmentation
Apically positioned flaps
Free soft tissue autografts
De-epithelialized pedicle grafts
Free connective tissue grafts