Illustrations (to 54) Flashcards
A, a school teacher, is a member of a retirement plan and has elected a lower monthly benefit in order to provide a benefit to her husband if she dies first. At age 60 she suffers a “nervous breakdown,” takes a leave of absence, and is treated for cerebral arteriosclerosis. When the leave expires she applies for retirement, revokes her previous election, and elects a larger annuity with no death benefit. In view of her reduced life expectancy, the change is foolhardy, and there are no other circumstances to explain the change. She fully understands the plan, but by reason of mental illness is unable to make a decision based on the prospect of her dying before her husband. The officers of the plan have reason to know of her condition. Two months after the changed election, she dies.
The change of election is voidable (15. Mental Illness or defect)
A owes B $50. In exchange for A’s payment of the debt B makes a promise.
B’s promise is without consideration (17. Requirement of a Bargain)
A writes an offer to B, which he encloses in an envelope, addresses and stamps. Shortly afterwards, he decides not to send the offer, but by mistake he deposits it in the mail. It is delivered to B, who accepts the offer.
There is a contract unless B knows or has reason to know of A’s error (19. Conduct as Manifestation of Assent)
A offers to sell B goods shipped from Bombay ex steamer “Peerless.” B accepts. There are two steamers of the name “peerless” sailing from Bombay at materially different times.
If both parties intend the same Peerless, there is a contract, and it is immaterial whether they know or have reason to know that two ships are named Peerless (20. Effect of Misunderstanding)
A offers to sell B goods shipped from Bombay ex steamer “Peerless.” B accepts. There are two steamers of the name “peerless” sailing from Bombay at materially different times. A means Peerless 1 and B means Peerless 2.
If neither A nor B knows or has reason to know that they mean different ships, or if they both know or if they both have reason to know, there is no contract (20. Effect of Misunderstanding)
A offers to sell B goods shipped from Bombay ex steamer “Peerless.” B accepts. There are two steamers of the name “peerless” sailing from Bombay at materially different times. A knows that B means Peerless 2 and B does not know that there are two ships named Peerless.
There is a contract for the sale of the goods from Peerless 2, and it is immaterial whether B has reason to know that A means Peerless 1. If A makes the contract with the undisclosed intention of not performing, it is voidable by B for misrepresentation. (20. Effect of Misunderstanding)
A offers to sell B goods shipped from Bombay ex steamer “Peerless.” B accepts. There are two steamers of the name “peerless” sailing from Bombay at materially different times. Neither party knows that there are two ships named Peerless. A has reason to know that B means Peerless 2 and B has no reason to know that A means Peerless 1.
There is a contract for the sale of goods from Peerless 2 (20. Effect of Misunderstanding)
A says to B, “I offer to sell you my horse for $100.” B, knowing that A intends to offer to sell his cow for that price, not his horse, and that the word “horse” is a slip of the tongue, replies, “I accept.” The price is a fair one for either the horse or the cow.
There is a contract for the sale of the cow and not of the horse. If B makes the contract with the undisclosed intention of not performing it, it is voidable by A for misrepresentation (20. Effect of Misunderstanding)
A sends B an offer through the mail to sell A’s horse for $500. While this offer is in the mail, B, in ignorance thereof, mails to A an offer to pay $500 for the horse
There is no contract (23. Necessity that Manifestations Have Reference to Each Other)
A sends to B an offer to sell a specified lot for $5,000, also stating terms as to time of payment, mortgage security, taxes and insurance. B is so anxious to buy the lot that, without reading any of these additional terms, he sends to A an unconditional acceptance.
There is a contract on the terms stated in A’s offer (23. Necessity that Manifestations Have Reference to Each Other)
A promises B under seal or in return for $100 paid or promised by B that A will sell B 100 shares of stock in a specified corporation for $5,000 at any time within thirty days B selects.
There is an option contract under which B has an option (25. Option Contracts)
A offers to sell B Blackacre for $5,000 at any time within thirty days. Subsequently A promises under seal or in return for $100 paid or promised by B that the offer will not be revoked.
There is an option contract under which B has an option (25. Option Contracts)
A, a clothing merchant, advertises overcoats of a certain kind for sale at $50.
This is not an offer, but an invitation to the public to come and purchase. The addition of the words “Out they go Saturday; First Come First Served” might make the advertisement an offer (26. Preliminary Negotiations)
A advertises that he will pay $5 for every copy of a certain book that may be sent to him.
This is an offer, and A is bound to pay $5 for every copy sent while the offer is unrevoked (26. Preliminary Negotiations)
A writes to B, “I can quote you flour at $5 a barrel in carload lots.”
This is not an offer, in view of the word “quote” and incompleteness of the terms. The same words, in response to an inquiry specifying detailed terms, would probably be an offer; and if A added “for immediate acceptance” the intent to make an offer would be unmistakable (26. Preliminary Negotiations)
A writes B, “I am eager to sell my house. I would consider $20,000 for it.” B promptly answers, “I will buy your house for $20,000 cash.”
There is no contract. A’s letter is a request or suggestion that an offer be made to him. B has made an offer (26. Preliminary Negotiations)
A sends a letter to B stating the terms of a proposed contract. At the end he writes, “You can accept this offer only by signing on the dotted line below my own signature.” A replies by telegram, “I accepted your offer.”
There is no contract (30. Form of Acceptance Invited)
A writes B, “If you will mow my lawn next week, I will pay you $10.”
B can accept A’s offer either by promptly promising to mow the lawn or by mowing it as requested (32. Invitation of Promise or Performance)
A says to B: “If you finish that table you are making and deliver it to my house today, I will give you $100 for it.” B replies, “I’ll do it.”
There is a contract. B could also accept by delivering the table as requested (32. Invitation of Promise or Performance)
A publishes the following offer: “I will pay $50 for the return of my diamond bracelet lost yesterday on State Street.” B sees this advertisement and at once sends a letter to A, saying “I accept your offer and will search for this bracelet.”
There is no acceptance (32. Invitation of Promise or Performance)