Illustrations (213-) Flashcards
A orally agrees to sell a city lot to B. The city is installing a sidewalk in front of the lot, and A orally agrees to pay the cost to be assessed by the city in an amount not exceeding $45. B then retains a lawyer to draw up a written agreement, and A and B execute it, A without reading it. The agreement provides that A will pay all costs of the installation of the sidewalk, but does not mention any dollar limit.
If the written agreement is a binding integrated agreement, any agreement for a $45 limit is discharged (213. Effect of Integrated Agreement on Prior Agreements (Parol Evidence Rule))
In May A and B exchange properties and agree orally that A will make certain repairs on the property to be conveyed by A to B, the repairs to be finished by October 1. A and B then draw up and sign a memorandum of the repair agreement, specifying all the terms except that the memorandum is silent as to time of performance
If the memorandum is a binding completely integrated agreement, the agreement to finish by October 1 is discharged, and the repairs are to be finished within a reasonable time. The oral agreement as to October 1 may be relevant evidence as to what is a reasonable time (213. Effect of Integrated Agreement on Prior Agreements (Parol Evidence Rule))
A, in an integrated contract with B, promises B to sell certain goods to be manufactured by A, and B promises to pay the “total cost.”
Previous negotiations may establish the meaning of “total cost.” (214. Evidence of Prior or Contemporaneous Agreements and Negotiations)
A and B make an integrated contract by which A promises to sell and B to buy goods “ex Peerless.”
Evidence is admissible to show that there are two ships of that name, which one each party meant, and, in case of misunderstanding, whether either had knowledge or reason to know of the other’s meaning (214. Evidence of Prior or Contemporaneous Agreements and Negotiations)
On June 1, A agrees to sell and B to buy goods to be delivered in October at a designated port. The port is subsequently closed by quarantine regulations during the entire month of October, no commercially reasonable substitute performance is available (see Uniform Commercial Code § 2-614(1)), and A fails to deliver the goods
A’s duty to deliver the goods is discharged, and A is not liable to B for breach of contract (261. Discharge by Supervening Impracticability)
A contracts to produce a movie for B. As B knows, A’s only source of funds is a $100,000 deposit in C bank. C bank fails, and A does not produce the movie.
A’s duty to produce the movie is not discharged, and A is liable to B for breach of contract (261. Discharge by Supervening Impracticability)
A and B make a contract under which B is to work for A for two years at a salary of $50,000 a year. At the end of one year, A discontinues his business because governmental regulations have made it unprofitable and fires B.
A’s duty to employ B is not discharged, and A is liable to B for breach of contract (261. Discharge by Supervening Impracticability)
A contracts to sell and B to buy a specific machine owned by A to be delivered on July 30. On July 29, as a result of a creditor’s suit against A, a receiver is appointed and takes charge of all of A’s assets, and A does not deliver the goods on July 30.
A’s duty to deliver the goods is not discharged, and A is liable to B for breach of contract (261. Discharge by Supervening Impracticability)
A, who has had many years of experience in the field of salvage, contracts to raise and float B’s boat, which has run aground. The contract, prepared by A, contains no clause limiting A’s duty in the case of unfavorable weather, unforeseen circumstances, or otherwise. The boat then slips into deep water and fills with mud, making it impracticable for A to raise it.
If the court concludes, on the basis of such circumstances as A’s experience and the absence of any limitation in the contract that A prepared, that A assumed an absolute duty, it will decide that A’s duty to raise and float the boat is not discharged and that A is liable to B for breach of contract. (261. Discharge by Supervening Impracticability)
A contracts to repair B’s grain elevator. While A is engaged in making repairs, a fire destroys the elevator without A’s fault, and A does not finish the repairs.
A’s duty to repair the elevator is discharged, and A is not liable to B for breach of contract. See Illustration 3 to § 263 (261. Discharge by Supervening Impracticability)
A contracts with B to carry B’s goods on his ship to a designated foreign port. A civil war then unexpectedly breaks out in that country and the rebels announce that they will try to sink all vessels bound for that port. A refuses to perform.
Although A did not contract to sail on the vessel, the risk of injury to others is sufficient to make A’s performance impracticable. A’s duty to carry the goods to the designated port is discharged, and A is not liable to B for breach of contract. Compare Illustration 5 to § 262 (261. Discharge by Supervening Impracticability)
A contracts with B to carry B’s goods on his ship to a designated foreign port. A civil war then unexpectedly breaks out in that country and the rebels announce that they will confiscate all vessels found in the designated port. The goods can be bought and sold on markets throughout the world. A refuses to perform.
Although there is no risk of injury to persons, the court may conclude that the risk of injury to property is disproportionate to the ends to be attained. A’s duty to carry the goods to the designated port is then discharged, and A is not liable to B for breach of contract. If, however, B is a health organization and the goods are scarce medical supplies vital to the health of the population of the designated port, the court may conclude that the risk is not disproportionate to the ends to be attained and may reach a contrary decision (261. Discharge by Supervening Impracticability)
A contracts to employ B as his confidential secretary for a year. B dies before the end of the year.
B’s duty to work for A is discharged, and B’s estate is not liable to A for breach of contract (262. Death or Incapacity of Person Necessary for Performance)
A contracts to employ B as his confidential secretary for a year. A dies before the end of the year, and B takes other employment
B’s duty to work for A is discharged, and B is not liable to A’s estate for breach of contract. (262. Death or Incapacity of Person Necessary for Performance)
A, a corporation, contracts to employ B as its secretary for five years. Within that time the state legislature enacts a law requiring the dissolution of corporations engaged in A’s business.
On dissolution, A’s duty to employ B is discharged, and A is not liable to B for breach of contract. See also § 264. B may have a claim against A under the rule stated in § 272(1) (262. Death or Incapacity of Person Necessary for Performance)
A, a corporation, contracts to employ B as its secretary for five years. Within that time, A’s dissolution is voluntary or the result of insolvency.
A’s duty to employ B is not discharged, and A is liable to B for breach of contract. See Comment b and Illustration 3 to § 261. Cf. Illustration 5 to § 319(262. Death or Incapacity of Person Necessary for Performance)
A contracts with B to produce a play starring C, a famous actor, in B’s theater on December 16. Early in December, while the play is being performed elsewhere, C experiences a worsening throat condition and, although it does not prevent his performing, he is advised by his doctor to cancel his further performances and have a minor operation. On December 12, A notifies B that the December 16 performance of the play is cancelled for this reason.
A’s duty to produce the play is discharged, and A is not liable to B for breach of contract. Compare Illustration 7 to § 261 (262. Death or Incapacity of Person Necessary for Performance)
A contracts with B to cut a tract of standing timber. A dies, and his estate refuses to complete performance.
In the absence of special circumstances showing that A’s personal service or supervision is necessary to performance of his duty, A’s duty to cut the timber is not discharged, and A’s estate is liable to B for breach of contract (262. Death or Incapacity of Person Necessary for Performance)
A and B make a contract under which A is to devote full time to prospecting for coal on B’s land, and, if he is successful, B personally is to finance and manage a corporation for the exploitation of the coal. B is to pay A a salary and convey to him a one-quarter interest in any resulting corporation. A locates coal and is paid his salary, but B dies before he is able to finance and manage a corporation to exploit it, and no such corporation is formed.
Whether performance of B’s duty to finance and manage a corporation became impracticable on B’s death depends on whether that duty, as understood by the parties, could only be performed by B himself. If the court concludes that it could, B’s duty to convey an interest in any resulting corporation is discharged, and B’s estate is not liable to A for breach of contract. A may have a claim against B under the rule stated in § 272(1) (262. Death or Incapacity of Person Necessary for Performance)
A and B, a firm of architects, contract with C to design a building for C. It is understood by the parties that both A and B shall render services under the contract. A dies and B fails to complete performance.
Both A’s and B’s duties to design the building are discharged, and neither A’s estate nor B is liable to C for breach of contract (262. Death or Incapacity of Person Necessary for Performance)
A and B, a firm of contractors doing an extensive business in many localities, contract with C to fill a tract of low land. A dies and B fails to complete performance.
Neither A’s nor B’s duty to fill the land is discharged, and both A’s estate and B are liable to C for breach of contract (262. Death or Incapacity of Person Necessary for Performance)
A contracts to sell and B to buy cloth. A expects to manufacture the cloth in his factory, but before he begins manufacture the factory is destroyed by fire without his fault. Although cloth meeting the contract description is available on the market, A refuses to buy and deliver it to B.
A’s duty to deliver the cloth is not discharged, and A is liable to B for breach of contract. See Illustration 12 to § 261; compare Illustration 7 to this Section (263. Destruction, Deterioration or Failure to Come into Existence of Thing Necessary for Performance)
A contracts to sell and B to buy cloth to be manufactured in the factory that is later destroyed. A expects to manufacture the cloth in his factory, but before he begins manufacture the factory is destroyed by fire without his fault.
A’s duty to deliver the cloth is discharged, and A is not liable to B for breach of contract (263. Destruction, Deterioration or Failure to Come into Existence of Thing Necessary for Performance)
A contracts with B to shingle the roof of B’s house. When A has done part of the work, much of the house including the roof is destroyed by fire without his fault, so that he is unable to complete the work.
A’s duty to shingle the roof is discharged, and A is not liable to B for breach of contract. Compare Illustration 6 to § 261 (263. Destruction, Deterioration or Failure to Come into Existence of Thing Necessary for Performance