II. Planning Activities - Analytical Procedures Flashcards
An auditor who performed analytical procedures that compared current-year financial information to the comparable prior period noted a significant increase in net income. Given this result, which of the following expectations of recorded amounts would be unreasonable?
- A decrease in costs of goods sold as a percentage of sales.
- A decrease in accounts payable.
- A decrease in retained earnings.
- A decrease in notes payable.
A significant increase in net income would result in an increase, not a decrease, in retained earnings.
Note:
- If there is a fixed cost component to inventory (for example, in a manufacturing environment), an increase in production to meet increased sales may result in a decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales.
- A significant increase in net income may be accompanied by increased cash inflows that could be used to pay down debts, including notes payable. (The same goes for accounts payable as well)
Which of the following results of analytical procedures would most likely indicate possible unrecorded liabilities?
- Current ratio of 2:1 as compared to 5:1 for the prior period.
- Ratio of accounts payable to total current liabilities of 4:1, compared to 6:1 for the prior period.
- Accounts payable turnover of 5, compared to 10 for the prior period.
- Accounts payable balance increase greater than 10% over the prior period.
Ratio of accounts payable to total current liabilities of 4:1, compared to 6:1 for the prior period.
Note: This ratio is total current liabilities divided by A/P. A decrease in this ratio (from 6:1 to 4:1) could be caused by an omission of current liabilities (other than A/P) resulting in the appearance that A/P is a larger proportion of total current liabilities than it should be.
Personal Notes:
- in this question, it is asking about an UNRECORDED LIABILITIES
- All of the other answers could be because of a an increase or a decrease in current liabilities so the others are wrong.
The auditor should consider certain factors in assessing the efficiency and effectiveness of analytical procedures as compared to tests of details. In determining whether and to what extent analytical procedures should be used, which of the should the auditor consider?
What are the 4 factors that determine the effectiveness and efficiency of the analytical procedures used for substantive purposes:?
4 factors that determine the effectiveness and efficiency of analytical procedures used for substantive purposes:
- (1) the nature of the assertion,
- (2) the plausibility and predictability of the relationship,
- (3) the availability and reliability of the data used to develop the expectation, and
- (4) the precision of the expectation
Which of the following is an analytical procedure that an auditor most likely would perform during the final review stage of an audit?
AICPA Professional Standards indicate that the overall review might include reading the financial statements and considering whether the evidence gathered is adequate to address identified unusual or unexpected balances as well as unusual or unexpected balances or relationships that were not previously identified.
Which of the following most likely would cause an auditor to consider whether a client’s financial statements contain material misstatements?
The results of an analytical procedure disclose unexpected differences.
Which of the following is an analytical procedure that an auditor most likely would perform when planning an audit?
Comparing current-year balances to budgeted balances
Think: Budgeting has to do with planning.
A primary objective of analytical procedures used in the final review stage of an audit is to
Analytical procedures used in the overall review stage of an audit are intended to assist the auditor in assessing the conclusions reached and in evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
Which of the following activities is an analytical procedure an auditor would perform in the final overall review stage of an audit to ensure that the financial statements are free from material misstatement?
Comparing the current and prior year’s financial statements is a legitimate analytical procedure performed both in planning and as a final review.
Which of the following statements is correct concerning analytical procedures used in planning an audit engagement?
They usually use financial and nonfinancial data aggregated at a high level.
note: Analytical procedures used in planning often use data aggregated at a high level
What is considered an analytical procedure?
- Converting dollar amounts of income statement account balances to percentages of net sales for comparison with industry averages
- Developing the current year’s expected net sales based on the sales trend of similar entities within the same industry
- Estimating the current year’s expected expenses based on the prior year’s expenses and the current year’s budget
Analytical procedures used in planning an audit should focus on identifying
Areas that may represent specific risks relevant to the audit.
Note: Analytical procedures are utilized to gain an understanding of the client’s business and to raise questions that will be answered through the application of substantive procedures.
For all audits of financial statements made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the use of analytical procedures is required to some extent
In the planning stage
As a substantive test
In the review stage
Yes
No
Yes
note: Analytical procedures are required in planning and in the overall review. They may be used, but are not required, as substantive tests.
Which of the following tends to be most predictable for purposes of analytical procedures applied as substantive tests?
Relationships involving income statement accounts tend to be more predictable for analytical review purposes because the income statement accounts represent transactions occurring over a period of time.
An auditor’s decision either to apply analytical procedures as substantive tests or to perform tests of transactions and account balances usually is determined by the
Relative effectiveness and efficiency of the tests.
Note: Evidence may be gathered by means of analytical tests (performed as substantive tests), tests of transactions, and tests of details of balances. The decision as to which means to employ is based on the auditor’s judgment of the expected effectiveness and efficiency of the available procedures.
Which of the following comparisons would an auditor most likely make in evaluating an entity’s costs and expenses?
The current year’s payroll expense with the prior year’s payroll expense
Note: The best comparison would be current-year and prior-year payroll expense as they are likely to be related to each other. Thus, the prior-year expense can be used to predict likely current-year expense.
If the numbers are materially different, it could indicate the existence of a material misstatement.
What procedure would an auditor most likely perform in planning a financial statement audit?
Comparing the financial statements to anticipated results
Note: Comparing the financial statements to anticipated results is an analytical procedure, which would most likely be performed in planning a financial statement audit.
Facts on Analytical procedures:
- Analytical procedures used for planning purposes are intended to enhance the auditor’s understanding of the client’s business and identify areas that may represent specific risks relevant to the audit.
- analytical procedures are most effective when they are applied to plausible and predictable relationships, often involving income statement accounts.(Operating Expense Transactions)
- Analytical procedures usually involve comparisons of recorded amounts, or ratios developed from recorded amounts, to expectations (not assertions) developed by the auditor (not management).
- Analytical procedures used in planning an audit generally use data aggregated at a high level.
- Analytical procedures do not replace tests of controls. Analytical procedures are required in planning and in the overall review and may be used as substantive procedures.
- Analytical procedures can be more efficient, as well as more effective, than tests of details and transactions in some cases.
- AU-C 315 and AU-C 520 require the use of analytical procedures at both the risk assessment and near completion of the audit, but not as a substantive procedure.
- Analytical procedures for planning purposes are performed to identify the existence of unusual transactions and events.
- substantive analytical procedures are substantive tests which can aid in the detection of material errors by identifying unexpected fluctuations or the absence of expected fluctuations in the relationships between data.
- Such as Material Dollar Misstatements
Note: Basically, any comparison and study of the financial information is an analytical procedure.
Analytical procedures can be more efficient, as well as more effective, than tests of details and transactions in some cases.
Cost of goods sold/average inventory.
Why?
Cost of goods sold/average inventory represents the turnover of inventory and provides information related to inventory valuation.
Which of the following tends to be most predictable for purposes of analytical procedures applied as substantive procedures?
Relationships involving income statement accounts.
Why?
AU-C 520 indicates that relationships involving income statement accounts tend to be more predictable than relationships involving only balance sheet accounts.
An auditor’s analytical procedures performed near the end of the audit indicated that the client’s accounts receivable had doubled since the end of the prior year. However, the allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of accounts receivable remained about the same. Which of the following client explanations most likely would satisfy the auditor?
The client opened a second retail outlet in the current year and its credit sales approximately equaled the older, established outlet.
Note:
This answer is correct because the opening of a second retail outlet with credit sales approximating the older, established outlet, and a consistent credit policy are likely to result in such a situation.
These situation would increase the percentage of doubtful accounts (and not satified the auditor):
The client liberalized its credit standards in the current year and sold much more merchandise to customers with poor credit ratings.
Twice as many accounts receivable were written off in the prior year than in the current year.
A greater percentage of accounts receivable were currently listed in the “more than 90 days overdue” category than in the prior year.