II. Internal Control - Concepts and Standards - Evaluating Internal Control Flashcards
What should the auditor do if Internal Controls are ineffective?
What happens if it was effective?
- the auditor would assess control risk at the maximum level and perform a wholly substantive approach.
- auditor should consider the possibility of assessing the control risk at less than the maximum level, which leads to considering any cost-benefit issues involved in adopting a reliant strategy.
- If so the auditor would have to perform test of controls to evaluate the Operating Effectiveness of those Internal Controls
After, choose max or low level of control risk, the auditor would prepare a written “Audit Plan” to achieve an appropriate level of detection risk, while considering material misstatement = (IR + CR)
Who is primarily responsible for the design and implementation of internal control?
The design and implementation of internal control is a management function (not the auditor’s responsibility!)
Note: Management makes the decision that effectively determines the effective or ineffectiveness of internal controls.
What does “Reasonable Assurance” Recognizes?
“Cost-benefit” considerations,
Note: The Costs of the control policy should not outweigh the benefits from it.
- Mistakes may occur dues to misunderstandings, misjudgements, or fatigue
- Breakdowns occurs from collusion or management overrides of internal controls
Assessing control risk at below the maximum level most likely would involve
Identifying specific internal control structure policies and procedures relevant to specific assertions.
Note: In order to assess control risk below maximum, the auditor must collect evidence to support the reduction. Collecting such evidence involves identifying specific internal controls relevant to specific assertions and then performing tests of controls to evaluate the effectiveness of the controls.
Control risk should be assessed in terms of
Financial statement assertions.
Note: The auditor assesses control risk for the assertions present in the financial statements. Such assertions may be found in the account balance, transaction class, or disclosure components. Based on the understanding of internal control and the control risk assessments, the auditor determines the nature, timing, and extent of the auditing procedures to be performed.
After obtaining an understanding of the internal control structure and assessing control risk of an entity, an auditor decided not to perform tests of controls.
The auditor most likely decided that
It would be inefficient to perform tests of controls that would result in a reduction in planned substantive tests.
Note: There is always a cost-benefit trade-off in testing controls. The auditor tests controls in order to rely on them and to reduce substantive testing. If testing controls won’t reduce substantive testing sufficiently (i.e., enough to offset the cost of testing controls), the auditor will opt not to test controls. In other words, it would be inefficient to perform the tests of controls.
Which of the following statements about internal control structure is correct?
The cost-benefit relationship is a primary criterion that should be considered in designing an internal control structure.
Note: A primary criterion of any system of internal control is the cost-benefit relationship. The cost of an entity’s internal control should not exceed the benefits to be derived.
What would be considered an inherent limitation of the potential effectiveness of an entity’s internal control structure?
These include:
The fallibility of human judgment and
performance and
the possibility of collusion or
management override.
Which of the following auditor concerns could most likely be so serious that the auditor concludes that a financial statement audit cannot be conducted?
The integrity of the entity’s management is suspect.
Note: The auditor would decide that an audit could not be conducted if management integrity were questioned. “Management integrity” is such a critical component of an effective internal control environment that the suspected lack thereof would be cause for the auditor to withdraw from the engagement.
After assessing control risk at below the maximum level, an auditor desires to seek a further reduction in the assessed level of control risk. At this time, the auditor would consider whether
Additional evidential matter sufficient to support a further reduction is likely to be available.
Note:
- If the auditor desires to further reduce the assessed level of control risk, he/she must first consider whether additional evidence will be available to support such a reduction.
- The auditor must also consider whether it would be efficient (cost-effective) to collect such evidence.
Which of the following statements is correct concerning an auditor’s assessment of control risk?
Assessing control risk may be performed concurrently during an audit with obtaining an understanding of the entity’s internal control structure.
Note: Understanding internal control and assessing control risk are steps that may be performed concurrently in an audit. The evidence collected to achieve one objective may also be used for the other objective.
For example, inquiries and information gathered about management’s use of budgets in order to understand the control environment may also be used as a test of control over the effectiveness and operation of the budgeting control.
When assessing control risk at below the maximum level, an auditor is required to document the auditor’s understanding of the
I. Entity’s control activities that help ensure management directives are carried out.
II. Entity’s control environment factors that help the auditor plan the engagement.
Both I and II.
Control activities and control environmental factors are both components of the internal control system. As a result, they would both be documented.
The _ultimate purpose of assessing control ris_k is to contribute to the auditor’s evaluation of the
Risk that material misstatements exist in the financial statements.
Note: Assessing control risk and inherent risk helps the auditor identify where misstatements might exist; the auditor then performs auditing procedures to detect those misstatements.
*** After obtaining an understanding of the internal control structure and assessing control risk, an auditor decided to perform tests of controls. The auditor most likely decided that
It would be efficient to perform tests of controls that would result in a reduction in planned substantive tests.
Note:
- if it is believed that such performance will result in a reduction in planned substantive tests.
- If the performance of tests of controls would not result in a reduction in substantive testing,
- completing tests of controls would be inefficient and therefore should not be performed.
- If there were a lot of internal control weakness the auditor would not perform more test of controls
- Additional evidence is needed to support further reduction in control risk
What are some facts on control risks?
- Assessing control risk and obtaining an understanding of an entity’s internal control structure may be performed concurrently.
- When control risk is at the maximum level, an auditor is required to document the basis for that assessment.
- Substantive testing cannot be eliminated through a lowered assessment of control risk. The auditor must perform substantive tests for significant account balances and transaction classes.
- When assessing control risk, the auditor may consider evidence obtained in prior audits about the operation of controls.
- In evaluating the use of such evidence, the auditor should consider the significance of the assertion involved, the specific controls evaluated previously, the degree to which the effective design and operation of those controls were evaluated, the results of previous tests of controls, and other evidential matter obtained about controls during the audit.
An auditor is evaluating a client’s internal controls. Which of the following situations would be the most difficult internal control issue for an auditor to detect?
An intentional circumvention of controls associated with collusion involving employees in different departments would be particularly difficult to detect.
The auditor should perform tests of controls of
tests of controls are only performed on controls that the auditor plans to consider is assessing the risk of material misstatement.
Note:
Performance of tests of controls on these controls may reduce the scope of substantive procedures needed.
Types of test of controls:
- An auditor interviews and observes appropriate personnel to determine segregation of duties.
- Examine signatures on checks.
- Records documenting usage of computer programs.
- Canceled supporting documents.
- Signatures on authorization forms.
statements about internal control:
- No one person should be responsible for the custodial responsibility and the recording responsibility for an asset.
- Transactions must be properly authorized before such transactions are processed.
- Because of the cost/benefit relationship, a client may apply controls on a test basis.
What is always required on a particular audit of a nonissuer (nonpublic) company
Risk assessment procedures.
Substantive procedures.
Analytical procedures.
Note:
Tests of controls are only required when the auditor relies on the controls or substantive tests alone are not sufficient to audit particular assertions.
Control risk should be assessed in terms of
Financial statement assertions.
In obtaining an understanding of an entity’s internal control, an auditor is required to obtain knowledge about the
Operating effectiveness
of controls
Design of
controls
No
Yes
Note:
the auditor should perform procedures to provide sufficient knowledge of the design of the relevant controls and whether they have been implemented. Information on operating effectiveness need not be obtained unless control risk is to be assessed at a level below the maximum.
Concerning current audit use of audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of controls obtained in prior year audits, the auditor generally may
Use such evidence, but should test related controls at least every third year.
Note:
professional standards allow use of such evidence if the related controls are tested at least every third year.
For certain controls, such as segregation of duties, documentary evidence may not exist. An auditor would most likely test the procedures by
Observation and inquiry.
Note:
auditing procedures suggests that when no audit trail exists an auditor should use the observation and inquiry techniques.
When an auditor discovered that certain control activities were ineffective, the auditor most likely would increase the
Extent of tests of details.
note:
an increase in the extent of tests of details (a type of substantive test) will decrease detection risk, which is appropriate because of the increase in control risk.