II. Internal Control - Concepts and Standards - Performing Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks Flashcards
Responsibilities under AICPA Professional Standards, Primary guidance applicable to the auditor consideration of I/C, is provided by 2 SASs:
- Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement
- Performing Audit Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks and Evaluating the Audit Evidence Obtained
Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement
Auditor’s Responsibility - The auditor should identify and assess the risks of material misstatement
Internal Control Considerations - A weak control environment (such as management’s lack of competence) may have pervasive financial statement effects and require an overall response by the auditor.
Significant Risks—These are risks that the auditor believes require special audit consideration.
Risks for which Substantive Procedures Alone do not Provide Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence— If there are risk for which substantive procedures alone do not provide sufficient appropriate evidence - the auditor would have to test the operating effectiveness of controls if risk obj. cannot be achieved with substantive procedures alone.
Revision of Risk Assessment—Risk assessment is an iterative =(ongoing) process and the assessment of risks may change as additional evidence is obtained.
Overall Responses to the Risks of Material Misstatement at the Financial Statement Level, what would the auditor do as the risk of material misstatement increases?
The auditor may assign more experienced staff to the engagement; provide closer supervision; use specialists; use more unpredictable audit procedures; and/or make appropriate changes in the nature, timing, or extent of further audit procedures.
Also note:
Assessment of the risk of material misstatement may influence the auditor’s strategy in using a substantive approach or a combined approach that uses both tests of controls (regarding the operating effectiveness of controls) and substantive procedures.
Responses to the Risks of Material Misstatement at the Relevant Assertion Level—
The assessment of the risk of material misstatement may affect the auditor’s decisions regarding the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures, including the tests of the operating effectiveness of controls and the substantive procedures.
What are the three different types of audit procedures?
- Risk Assessment
- Tests of Controls - Determines the operating effectiveness of controls
-
Should be performed when:
- Risk assessment includes an expectation of the operating effectiveness of controls (when relying on certain specific procedures)
- Substantive procedure alone would not provide sufficient appropriate evidence (that “wholly substantive” audit approach is not sufficient)
-
Should be performed when:
- Substantive Procedures
When Evaluating the Sufficiency and Appropriateness of the Audit Evidence Obtained, what should the auditor do?
- An audit is an iterative process, so the planned audit procedures may need to be modified;
- for example, identified misstatements from substantive procedures may alter the auditor’s judgment about the effectiveness of controls.
- Consider all relevant audit evidence—The auditor should consider all relevant audit evidence, whether it appears to corroborate or contradict the relevant assertions.
The auditor should document all of what?
- The overall responses to address the assessed risk of misstatement at the financial statement level;
- The nature, timing, and extent of the further audit procedures;
- The linkage of those procedures with the assessed risks at the relevant assertion level;
- The results of the audit procedures; and
- The conclusions reached in the current audit about the operating effectiveness of controls tested in a prior audit.
When the operating effectiveness of a control is not evidenced by written documentation, an auditor should obtain evidence about the control’s effectiveness by
Inquiry and other procedures such as observation.
Note: Inquiry and observation may be useful in evaluating the effectiveness of internal controls, including those that are undocumented.
When companies use information technology (IT) extensively, evidence may be available only in electronic form. What is an auditor’s best course of action in such situations?
When evidence is available only in electronic form, the auditor may find that generalized audit software is the best and most efficient means of extracting evidence from client databases.
Generalized audit software consists of programs that enable an auditor to perform tests on client computer files and databases.
The objective of tests of details of transactions performed as tests of controls is to
The objective of tests of controls is to ascertain whether internal controls are designed properly or operating effectively.
What is the purpose of substantive tests?
- Detect material misstatements in the account balances of the financial statements.
The objective of obtaining an understanding of the internal control structure is to
- determine the nature, timing, and extent of substantive tests for financial statement assertions.
Which of the following auditor concerns most likely could be so serious that the auditor concludes that a financial statement audit cannot be performed?
The auditor would conclude that a financial audit could not be performed if he/she determined that a substantial risk of intentional misapplication of accounting principles existed.
Note: The key word is “intentional” as the risk of management override is an inherent limitation of any internal control system. Management can override the system to make material misstatements in the financial statements and the auditors may not be able to detect such entries.
If management is believed to be intentionally misapplying accounting principles, the financial statements are likely to contain material misstatements that may be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to detect. Thus, the auditors would withdraw from the engagement.
An auditor may decide to assess control risk at the maximum level for certain assertions because the auditor believes
Control policies and procedures are unlikely to pertain to the assertions.
Note: Control risk is assessed in terms of the financial statement assertions. The auditor may assess control risk at maximum because the controls do not pertain to the assertions, or are ineffective, or because testing such controls would not result in a reduction in substantive testing (would be inefficient).
The objective of “tests of details” of transactions performed as tests of controls is to
To evaluate whether internal controls operated effectively. A test of details of transactions performed as a test of control will enable the auditor to detect a control failure.