II. Hybrid Social Business Model/ Case study Samasource Flashcards

1
Q

Impact Investing

A
  • Investment into companies/ organizations/ funds
  • Intention to generate positive social/environmental impact and financial return
  • Investments are often project specific
  • Different levels of philanthropy (Wohltätigkeit) since investor retains ownership over asset/ expects positive financial return
  • Beneficiaries = Social Enterprises and Social Entrepreneurial Initiatives (Also customers but actors are different)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who invests in B-Corps and Social Enterprises?

A
  • Socially Responsible Investing
  • Social Impact Investing
  • Venture Philanthropy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Socially Responsible Investing

A
  • Social return is expected but social and environmental variables are considered
  • Negative screening
  • Risk management
  • Shareholder activism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Social Impact Investing

A
  • Investment into companies/ organizations/ funds

- Intention to generate positive social/environmental impact and financial return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Venture Philanthropy

A
  • Grant-making model (Zuschussmodel) with no return expected

- Ventures investing funds and strategic assistance into Start-Ups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of Investors

A
  • Impact first = Ananda
  • Financial first = Khosla Impact (Criteria: 1. Targets crucial issues/ 2. Improve ROI of low-income segments/ 3. Destroy monopoly/ 4. Product or Technology based on ethnographic insights)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mission Statement

A
  • Defines organizational goals
  • Sets the boundaries of organizational strategies
  • Sets guidelines to measure organizational success
  • Defines beneficiaries and customers
  • Characterizes the “theory of change” of the organization
  • E.g. Nikes Mission = “If you have a body, you are an athlete”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Social enterprises vs. traditional enterprises- How they regard value

A
  • TE -> Value capture = Maximizing value captured by organization/ Success measured at organizational level
  • SE -> Value creation = Maximizing value created for society/ Value captured just what needed for activities/ Success measured at society level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Social enterprises vs. traditional enterprises- Strategic focus:

A
  • TE -> Sustainable Advantage = Become essential in market/ Insulate from competition/ Identifying lack of services and costs opportunities
  • SE -> Sustainable Solutions = Become essential to address a social problem/ Correct perceived market and government failure/ Identifying unaddressed social issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Social enterprises vs. traditional enterprises- Managerial Approach

A
  • TE -> Control = Control value chain & critical transactions & resources/ Making stakeholders dependent on company
  • SE -> Empowerment = Raise effectiveness of the overall social system/ Release underutilized skills and resources in novel BM/ Empowering stakeholders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Social & Commercial Logics

A
  • Goals = Generate economic surplus by selling goods/ services (com) vs. Address local social needs by making products/services available (soc)
  • Strategies = Production efficiency/ Customer satisfaction/ Sustainable profitability (com) vs. “Social effectiveness”/ Beneficiaries satisfaction/ Sustainable impact (soc)
  • Key stakeholders = Customers/ Suppliers/ Commercial partners (com) vs. Beneficiaries/ NGOs/ Public services (soc)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Tensions faced by social entrepreneurial initiatives

A
  • Performing
  • Belonging tensions
  • Time orientation tensions
  • Organizing tensions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Performing tensions

A
  • What is success?
  • Lack of clarity/ disagreement about the definition of success
  • Max 3 KPIs (Not too many)
  • Difficulties to support/ create metrics for social and commercial performance at the same time
  • Capacity to address needs of target beneficiaries (soc) vs. Capacity to address needs of target customers (com)
  • Customers vs. Beneficiaries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Belonging tensions

A
  • Who are we?
  • Identity change due to sub-groups dominance
  • Difficult to communicate identity-changes to external stakeholders
  • Different logics of employees imply different identities that might clash
  • Important to develop clear common identity/ Formalize goals and objectives/ Trustworthiness of the mission
  • Employees identify with social mission (soc) vs. Employees identify with business objectives (com)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Time orientation tensions

A
  • Short term or long term?
  • Business success comes from short term gains
  • Social expansion requires a long-term perspective
  • Social impact might constrain (beeinträchtigen) economic growth
  • Social impact requires long-term orientation/ Growth can increase but also threaten social impact (soc) vs. Business success come from short-term gain/ Social mission can constrain growth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Organizing tensions

A
  • Which kind of skills, processes and structures?
  • Should you hire individuals with commercial or with social competencies?
  • Should you prioritize activities to create value for beneficiaries or customers?
  • How should departments be organized?
  • Social impact requires investments/ Deep knowledge of societal issues (soc) vs. Business success requires customer orientation/ Effective cost management (com)
17
Q

How to address tensions?

A
  • Performing -> Clear Value propositions for Customers & Beneficiaries/ Clear KPIs
  • Belonging -> Common and overarching (übergreifende) Identity/ Trustworthiness to mission/ Formalization and Collaboration
  • Time orientation -> Dialogue with stakeholders to understand short- and long-term expectations and priorities
18
Q

Managerial challenges

A
  • Strategic challenges
  • Managing trade-offs
  • Social innovation in the technology sector
19
Q

Business Process Outsourcing

A
  • Subset of outsourcing
  • Contracting operations and responsibilities of a specific business process to a third-party service provider
  • Most common areas Customer care (52%)/ Finance & Accounting (23%)/ HR (16%(
20
Q

Reasons for outsourcing

A
  • Economic = Cost reduction/ Transforming fixed costs into variable costs
  • Strategic = Flexible service/ Better focus on core competencies
  • Technological = Access to new technology
21
Q

From Business Process Outsourcing to Impact Sourcing

A
  • Impact Sourcing = Employing people at the base of the pyramid with limited opportunity for sustainable employment (Annual income <3000$)
  • Implement them as principal workers in business process outsourcing centers to provide information-based services to domestic and international clients
22
Q

Samasources’s Mission and Approach

A
  • Vision = Address poverty
  • Mission = Access to work and train employees through digital work -> Empowerment
  • Target group of workers in the middle of pyramid instead of bottom (cheaper because of training efforts)
  • Process Innovation = Performing something efficient and effective
  • In between people who need work and customers who require low-cost labor
23
Q

Samasource’s stakeholders and expectations

A
  • Customers = quality of service, cost savings, flexibility, reliability, social impact
  • Beneficiaries = training, wage, career development, better life conditions, emp.
  • Employees = meaningful work, financial income
  • Donors = maximizing social impact (job creation, living wages, training workers, impact on poverty, transparency, consistency with mission)
  • For-profit investor = ROI
  • Delivery Centres (Local Entrepreneurs) = Know-how, Stable revenues, Stable work, Financial resources (support to grow)
  • Community
  • Media = raises awareness about what Samasource is trying to address
  • Competitors
24
Q

Samasources’s Tensions

A
  • Performance tension = Customers (Low-price/Flexibility) vs. Beneficiaries (Training))/ Investors (Economic benefit) vs. Donors (Social impact)
  • Time-orientation tension = Delivery Centers & Beneficiaries benefit (Long-term) vs. Customers & Investors profitability (Short-term)
  • Organizing tension = Customers (Economic employees) vs. Beneficiaries (Social employees)/ Social impact (Training) vs. Quality of outcome (Customers)/ Donors (scale up impact) vs. Delivery centers (Scale deep)
25
Q

Samasources strategy to manage tensions – People

A
  • CEO = cares about the social mission of Samasource;
  • Marketing manager = customer orientation -> closing contracts with them
  • Pluralist Manager = Specialized engineer (managing delivery centers)
  • Project manager = Quality control
  • Trainers and recruiters = Mainly interact with beneficiaries
26
Q

Samasources strategy to manage tensions- Structure

A
  • Sama-Hub = Technology they are using to combine the needs of customers (flexibility, efficiency and quality) and of beneficiaries
  • Sama-Lab = Standardize processes
  • Sales department = Specifically focused on customers
  • Delivery Centre = Works with trainers and recruiters
27
Q

Samasources strategy to manage tensions- Processes

A
  • Quality assurance
  • Screening of partners
  • Long-term contracts with customers
  • Start every job with a trial
  • Highly standardized processes
  • Tracking performance (very rigorous)
  • Pull model -> entrepreneurs go to them
28
Q

Samasource Scaling Strategy

A
  • Samahope -> provides financial resources to access medical treatments in underdeveloped countries
  • Samaschool -> digital skills training in developed countries)
  • Both founded to leverage technology to scale social impact
29
Q

Does it make sense for Samasource to differentiate their businesses?

A
  • Yes = 1. Different Targets/ 2. Support all chain/ 3. Efficiency/ 4. Sope Economies
  • No = 1. Needs to be established firstly (No trust in efficiency)/ 2. Confusing for donors (Complex, No clear social orientation)/ 3. Too much differentiation could lead to value loss for customers/ 4. Goals coordination difficult across organizations
  • Answer = No -> Really struggled to keep it sustainable due to missing synergies between companies