IFRS Flashcards
IFRS 15 basis
Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Het basisprincipe van IFRS 15 is dat een onderneming opbrengsten moet verantwoorden voor geleverde goederen of diensten ter hoogte van het bedrag waarop de onderneming verwacht recht te hebben in ruil voor die goederen of diensten. Om het basisprincipe toe te kunnen passen moet een onderneming de volgende stappen doorlopen:
- identificeren van het contract met een klant;
- identificeren van prestatieverplichtingen in het contract (performance obligation)
- vaststellen van de transactieprijs;
- alloceren van de transactieprijs aan de prestatieverplichtingen in het contract;
- verantwoorden van opbrengsten op het moment dat de onderneming een prestatieverplichting vervult.
IFRS 15 stap 1
Stap 1: Identificeren van het contract met een klant.
De vraag rijst wanneer sprake is van een contract waarop de bepalingen van IFRS 15 van toepassing zijn. Hiervan is sprake als voldaan wordt aan de volgende vijf criteria:
1. de partijen hebben het contract goedgekeurd en hebben zich gecommitteerd aan hun verplichtingen;
2. de onderneming kan de rechten van iedere partij ten aanzien van de te leveren goederen of diensten identificeren;
3. de onderneming kan de betalingscondities voor de te leveren goederen of diensten identificeren;
4. het contract heeft economische betekenis; en
5. het is waarschijnlijk dat de onderneming de vergoeding zal innen in ruil voor de te leveren goederen of diensten aan de klant
IFRS 15 stap 2
Stap 2: Identificeren van prestatieverplichtingen in het contract.
Een onderneming kan zich verplichten tot de levering van verschillende goederen of diensten in één contract. In dat geval moet worden vastgesteld of, en zo ja, welke goederen of diensten een prestatieverplichting bevatten (of ze onderscheidbaar (‘distinct’) zijn)?
Daarvan is sprake als
(1) de klant de voordelen van de goederen of diensten zelfstandig kan benutten (dan wel gezamenlijk met
middelen die de klant ter beschikking staan) en
(2) de goederen of diensten onderscheidbaar zijn van de overige afspraken binnen de context van het
contract. Als de goederen of diensten in het contract onderling dusdanig verbonden zijn dat het niet mogelijk is om prestatieverplichtingen aan te wijzen, verwerkt de onderneming het contract als ware het één prestatieverplichting.
Voorbeeld:
1) Verkoop van machine
2) Installatie van machine
3) Training van personeel om machine te gebruiken
IFRS 15 stap 3
Stap 3: Vaststellen van de transactieprijs.
De transactieprijs betreft het bedrag waarop de onderneming verwacht recht te hebben in ruil voor de te leveren goederen of diensten. Eventuele afwaarderingen als gevolg van kredietrisico dienen als een afzonderlijke kostenpost te worden verantwoord en gepresenteerd in de winst-en-verliesrekening.
Bij het vaststellen van de transactieprijs moet de onderneming rekening houden met:
* variabele vergoedingen;
* de aanwezigheid van een significante financieringscomponent;
* non-cash vergoedingen;
* vergoedingen te betalen aan de klant.
Variabele vergoedingen ontstaan bijvoorbeeld door kortingen, bonussen, boeteclausules, retouren, etc. IFRS 15 schrijft twee methodes voor op basis waarvan de variabele vergoeding moet worden bepaald:
a. de verwachtingswaardemethode; de som van de verwachte uitkomsten vermenigvuldigd met de daarbij
behorende kansen; en
b. de meest waarschijnlijke uitkomst in een reeks van mogelijke uitkomsten.
Bij de keuze voor een methode moet een onderneming kiezen voor de methode die leidt tot de meest betrouwbare uitkomst.
Het bestaan van een significante financieringscomponent hangt af van factoren zoals het tijdverschil tussen de levering van de goederen of diensten en de betaling. Ondernemingen hebben de keuze (vrijstelling) contracten met een periode tussen levering en betaling van maximaal een jaar uit te zonderen van deze evaluatie. The transaction price is adjusted for the effects of the time value of money if the contract includes a significant financing component
Non-cash vergoedingen dienen te worden gewaardeerd tegen reële waarde.
Vergoedingen te betalen aan de klant worden in mindering gebracht op de transactieprijs. Bijvoorbeeld een cash incentive. Dat is anders als vergoedingen betrekking hebben op een levering van een goed of dienst door de klant aan de onderneming.
IFRS 15 stap 4
Stap 4: Alloceren van de transactieprijs aan de prestatieverplichtingen in het contract.
Deze stap veronderstelt het bestaan van meer dan één prestatieverplichting in een contract. De totale transactieprijs wordt gealloceerd aan de prestatieverplichtingen middels een methodiek gebaseerd op de relatieve zelfstandige verkoopprijzen van de prestatieverplichtingen. Deze methodiek maakt zoveel als mogelijk gebruik van waar te nemen verkoopprijzen van het goed of de dienst. Indien deze niet beschikbaar zijn, dan moeten deze worden geschat.
Ter illustratie het volgende voorbeeld.
De totale transactieprijs van een bundel producten A, B en C bedraagt EUR 100. De zelfstandige verkoopprijs bij afzonderlijke verkoop van product A is EUR 50, van product B EUR 25 en van product C EUR 75. Totaal een bedrag ter hoogte van EUR 150. Dit impliceert een korting van EUR 50 voor een bundel van producten A, B en C. Deze methodiek geeft de volgende allocatie van de totale transactieprijs van EUR 100:
A 33 = 50/150 x 100
B 17 = 25/150 x 100
C 50 = 75/150 x 100
IFRS 15 stap 5
Stap 5: Verantwoorden van opbrengsten op het moment dat de onderneming een prestatieverplichting vervult.
De onderneming verantwoordt opbrengsten wanneer zij de prestatieverplichting vervult door goederen of diensten over te dragen aan de klant. Het moment van overdracht is:
1. over een periode; of
2. op een moment in de tijd.
Het eerste patroon is vergelijkbaar met de huidige opbrengstverantwoording naar rato van de verrichte prestaties.
Het tweede patroon is vergelijkbaar met de huidige opbrengstverantwoording bij verkoop van goederen.
De volgende voorbeelden illustreren genoemde situaties die leiden tot opbrengstverantwoording over een periode:
1. verzorgen van een cursus;
2. het schilderen van een kantoor in eigendom van klant;
3. juridische diensten.
IAS 16 basis
Property, plan and equipment
- Initiële kosten: Een actief wordt aanvankelijk tegen kostprijs erkend. Dit omvat de aankoopprijs en alle kosten die direct toewijsbaar zijn aan het brengen van het actief naar de locatie en conditie voor het beoogde gebruik. If operation of an item of PP&E (e.g. an aircraft) requires regular major inspections, the cost of each major inspection is recognised in the carrying amount of the asset. The carrying amount of an asset is adjusted when there is a change in the estimated decommissioning or restoration liability related to that asset.
- Subsequent costs: Na de initiële erkenning, moet een entiteit kiezen tussen de ‘cost model’ en de ‘revaluation model’ voor de boekhouding van PPE. Het cost model houdt in dat het actief wordt gedragen tegen kostprijs minus cumulatieve afschrijvingen en cumulatieve waardeverminderingen. Het revaluation model houdt in dat het actief wordt gedragen tegen een herwaardeerde hoeveelheid. Jaarlijks via OCI. Bij revaluation model dient de volledig “class” geherwaardeerd te worden, niet slechts één activa.
- Depreciation: Afschrijvingen moeten systematisch over de levensduur van het actief worden toegerekend. De methode van afschrijving moet de manier weerspiegelen waarop de economische voordelen van het actief worden geconsumeerd door de entiteit.
- Disposal: Winst of verlies bij de verkoop van een actief moet worden berekend als het verschil tussen de opbrengsten van de verkoop en de boekwaarde van het actief. Any revaluation surplus on disposal of an asset remains in equity and is not reclassified to profit or loss.
Verschillen tussen IAS 16 en BE-GAAP
- Herwaarderingsmodel: In tegenstelling tot IAS 16, staat BE-GAAP het gebruik van het herwaarderingsmodel niet toe. Alle activa moeten worden gedragen tegen kostprijs minus cumulatieve afschrijvingen en cumulatieve waardeverminderingen.
- Afschrijvingsmethoden: BE-GAAP is strenger in de toegestane afschrijvingsmethoden. Het staat alleen lineaire afschrijving toe, terwijl IAS 16 verschillende methoden toestaat, waaronder lineaire, dalende balans en units of production.
- Component approach: IAS 16 vereist een ‘component approach’, waarbij verschillende delen van een actief afzonderlijk worden afgeschreven als hun nuttige levensduur aanzienlijk verschilt. BE-GAAP heeft geen dergelijke vereiste.
- Impairment: IAS 16 vereist een jaarlijkse toetsing op bijzondere waardeverminderingen, terwijl BE-GAAP alleen een toetsing vereist als er aanwijzingen zijn voor een waardevermindering.
IAS 20
Government grants
A company recognises a government grant when it has reasonable assurance that it will comply with the relevant conditions and the grant will be received. This may be a judgemental matter, particularly when governments are introducing new programmes that may require new legislation, or for which there is little established practice for assessing whether the conditions to receive a grant are met.
- grants related to assets – whether to:
a) deduct the grant from the cost of the asset (net presentation) or
b) present the grant separately as deferred income to be amortised over the useful life of the asset (gross presentation) - Revenue grants or grants related to income – whether to:
a) offset the grant against the related expenditure (net presentation) or
b) present it separately or under a general heading such as ‘Other income’ (gross presentation).
IAS 8
Grondslagen voor financiële verslaggeving, schattingswijzigingen en fouten.
Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.
Changes in an accounting policy are applied retrospectively unless this is impracticable or unless another IFRS Standard sets specific transitional provisions. Apply to prior year FS and adjust opening retained earnings. The new policy results in more reliable information or is required by an IFRS.
Change from cost model to revaluation model is NOT considered a change in policy but under IAS 16 as a revaluation.
Changes in accounting estimates result from new information or new developments and, accordingly, are not corrections of errors. The effect of a change in an accounting estimate is recognised prospectively by including it in profit or loss in:
* the period of the change, if the change affects that period only; or
* the period of the change and future periods, if the change affects both.
Examples: ECL, depreciation, warranty repairs,…
Prior period errors are omissions from, and misstatements in, the entity’s financial statements for one or more prior periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse of, available reliable information. Unless it is impracticable to determine the effects of the error, an entity corrects material prior period errors retrospectively by restating the comparative amounts for the prior period(s) presented in which the error occurred.
IAS 37
Provisions, contingent liabilities (voorwaarderlijke verplichtingen) and contingent assets
- Liability:
1) present obligation as a result of past events
2) settlement is expected to result in an outflow of resources (payment) - Contingent liability:
1) a possible obligation depending on whether some uncertain future event occurs, or
2) a present obligation but payment is not probable or the amount cannot be measured reliably - Contingent asset:
1) a possible asset that arises from past events, and
2) whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the entity.
E.g. when you sue someone,
Recognition of a provision
An entity must recognise a provision if, and only if:
* a present obligation (legal or constructive) has arisen as a result of a past event (the obligating event),
* payment is probable (‘more likely than not’), and
* the amount can be estimated reliably (PV if applicable).
Contingent liabilities
Since there is common ground as regards liabilities that are uncertain, IAS 37 also deals with contingencies. It requires that entities should not recognise contingent liabilities – but should disclose them, unless the possibility of an outflow of economic resources is remote. [IAS 37.86]
Contingent assets
Contingent assets should not be recognised – but should be disclosed where an inflow of economic benefits is probable. When the realisation of income is virtually certain, then the related asset is not a contingent asset and its recognition is appropriate.
IAS 37 Restructurings
A restructuring is:
* sale or termination of a line of business
* closure of business locations
* changes in management structure
* fundamental reorganisations.
Restructuring provisions should be recognised as follows:
* Sale of operation: recognise a provision only after a binding sale agreement
* Closure or reorganisation: recognise a provision only after a detailed formal plan is adopted and has started being implemented, or announced to those affected. A board decision of itself is insufficient.
* Future operating losses: provisions are not recognised for future operating losses, even in a restructuring
* Restructuring provision on acquisition: recognise a provision only if there is an obligation at acquisition date
Restructuring provisions should include only direct expenditures necessarily entailed by the restructuring, not costs that associated with the ongoing activities of the entity.
IAS 37 examples
- Warranty: When an obligating event occurs (sale of product with a warranty and probable warranty claims will be made)
- Restructuring by sale of an operation: Only when the entity is committed to a sale, i.e. there is a binding sale agreement
- Restructuring by closure or reorganisation: Only when a detailed form plan is in place and the entity has started to implement the plan, or announced its main features to those affected. A Board decision is insufficient.
- Land contamination: A provision is recognised as contamination occurs for any legal obligations of clean up, or for constructive obligations if the company’s published policy is to clean up even if there is no legal requirement to do so (past event is the contamination and public expectation created by the company’s policy)
- Customer refunds: Recognise a provision if the entity’s established policy is to give refunds (past event is the sale of the product together with the customer’s expectation, at time of purchase, that a refund would be available)
- Offshore oil rig must be removed and sea bed restored: Recognise a provision for removal costs arising from the construction of the the oil rig as it is constructed, and add to the cost of the asset. Obligations arising from the production of oil are recognised as the production occurs.
- Abandoned leasehold, four years to run, no re-letting possible: A provision is recognised for the unavoidable lease payments.
- CPA firm must staff training for recent changes in tax law: No provision is recognised (there is no obligation to provide the training, recognise a liability if and when the retraining occurs)
- Major overhaul or repairs: No provision is recognised (no obligation)
- Onerous (loss-making) contract: Recognise a provision (e.g. when an entity cannot cancel, and must continue to pay for, a cleaning contract even though it has vacated the premises to which the contract relates)
- Future operating losses: No provision is recognised (no liability)
IAS 37 measurement of provisions
The amount recognised as a provision should be the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date, that is, the amount that an entity would rationally pay to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date or to transfer it to a third party. This means:
- Provisions for one-off events (restructuring, environmental clean-up, settlement of a lawsuit) are measured at the most likely amount.
- Provisions for large populations of events (warranties, customer refunds) are measured at a probability-weighted expected value.
- Both measurements are at discounted present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability.
In reaching its best estimate, the entity should take into account the risks and uncertainties that surround the underlying events.
If some or all of the expenditure required to settle a provision is expected to be reimbursed by another party, the reimbursement should be recognised as a separate asset, and not as a reduction of the required provision, when, and only when, it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received if the entity settles the obligation. The amount recognised should not exceed the amount of the provision.
IAS 40
Investment property is property (land or a building or part of a building or both) held (by the owner or by the lessee under a finance lease) to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both.
Examples of investment property:
* land held for long-term capital appreciation
* land held for a currently undetermined future use
* building leased out under an operating lease
* vacant building held to be leased out under an operating lease
* property that is being constructed or developed for future use as investment property
The following are NOT investment property and, therefore, are outside the scope of IAS 40:
* property held for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes
* property held for sale in the ordinary course of business or in the process of construction of development for such sale (IAS 2 Inventories)
* property being constructed or developed on behalf of third parties (IAS 11 Construction Contracts)
* owner-occupied property (IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment), including property held for future use as owner-occupied property, property held for future development and subsequent use as owner-occupied property, property occupied by employees and owner-occupied property awaiting disposal
* property leased to another entity under a finance lease
Initial measurement
Investment property is initially measured at cost, including transaction costs. Such cost should not include start-up costs, abnormal waste, or initial operating losses incurred before the investment property achieves the planned level of occupancy.
Measurement subsequent to initial recognition
IAS 40 permits entities to choose between:
a) a fair value model, and
b) a cost model.
One method must be adopted for all of an entity’s investment property. Change is permitted only if this results in a more appropriate presentation. IAS 40 notes that this is highly unlikely for a change from a fair value model to a cost model.
Investment property is remeasured at fair value, which is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of investment property must be included in net profit or loss for the period in which it arises.
S
IAS 16 vs IAS 40: revaluation model vs fair value model
Under the IAS 40 fair value model, investment property is not depreciated and changes in fair value are recognized in profit or loss. This is different from the revaluation model in IAS 16, under which the asset is depreciated and revaluation increases or decreases are recognized in other comprehensive income.
IAS 10
Events After the Reporting Period
- Adjusting event: An event after the reporting period that provides further evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period, including an event that indicates that the going concern assumption in relation to the whole or part of the enterprise is not appropriate. Adjust financial statements for adjusting events - events after the balance sheet date that provide further evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period, including events that indicate that the going concern assumption in relation to the whole or part of the enterprise is not appropriate. (e.g. such as the resolution of a court case after the end of the reporting period)
- Non-adjusting event (e.g.such as a decline in market prices after year end): An event after the reporting period that is indicative of a condition that arose after the end of the reporting period. Non-adjusting events should be disclosed if they are of such importance that non-disclosure would affect the ability of users to make proper evaluations and decisions. The required disclosure is
(a) the nature of the event and
b) an estimate of its financial effect or a statement that a reasonable estimate of the effect cannot be made.
E.g. significant aquisitions or disposals after year end.
An entity shall not prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis if management determines after the end of the reporting period either that it intends to liquidate the entity or to cease trading, or that it has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Dividends proposed or declared after the end of the reporting period are NOT recognised as a liability at the end of the reporting period.
IAS 19
Employee Benefits (Pensions)
- Defined contribution plans. Under a defined contribution plan, the entity pays fixed contributions into a fund but has no legal or constructive obligation to make further payments if the fund does not have sufficient assets to pay all of the employees’ entitlements to post-employment benefits. The entity’s obligation is therefore effectively limited to the amount it agrees to contribute to the fund and effectively place actuarial and investment risk on the employee
- Defined benefit plans. These are post-employment benefit plans other than a defined contribution plans. These plans create an obligation on the entity to provide agreed benefits to current and past employees and effectively places actuarial and investment risk on the entity. Not common anymore in todays world.
For defined contribution plans, the amount recognised in the period is the contribution payable in exchange for service rendered by employees during the period.
An entity is required to recognise the net defined benefit liability or asset in its statement of financial position. However, the measurement of a net defined benefit asset is the lower of any surplus in the fund and the ‘asset ceiling’ (i.e. the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan). Company is liable for underperformance of pension fund.
The measurement of a net defined benefit liability or assets requires the application of an actuarial valuation method, the attribution of benefits to periods of service, and the use of actuarial assumptions. The fair value of any plan assets is deducted from the present value of the defined benefit obligation in determining the net deficit or surplus.
The present value of an entity’s defined benefit obligations and related service costs is determined using the ‘projected unit credit method’, which sees each period of service as giving rise to an additional unit of benefit entitlement and measures each unit separately in building up the final obligation.
The components of defined benefit cost is recognised as follows:
* Service cost (resulting from the service of employees) attributable to the current and past periods > Profit or loss
* Net interest (the change in the liability (asset) caused by the passage of time and is recognised in profit or loss) on the net defined benefit liability or asset, determined using the discount rate at the beginning of the period > Profit or loss
* Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability or asset, comprising: > Other comprehensive income
a) actuarial gains and losses
b) return on plan assets
c) some changes in the effect of the asset ceiling
IFRS 2
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment requires an entity to recognise share-based payment transactions (such as granted shares, share options, or share appreciation rights) in its financial statements, including transactions with employees or other parties to be settled in cash, other assets, or equity instruments of the entity. Specific requirements are included for equity-settled and cash-settled share-based payment transactions, as well as those where the entity or supplier has a choice of cash or equity instruments.
A share-based payment is a transaction in which the entity receives goods or services either as consideration for its equity instruments or by incurring liabilities for amounts based on the price of the entity’s shares or other equity instruments of the entity. The accounting requirements for the share-based payment depend on how the transaction will be settled, that is, by the issuance of (a) equity, (b) cash, or (c) equity or cash.
All share-based payment transactions are recognised in the financial statements, using a fair value measurement basis. An expense is recognised when the goods or services received are consumed (including transactions for which the entity cannot specifically identify some or all of the goods or services received).
Equity-settled share-based payments
The issuance of shares or rights to shares requires an increase in a component of equity. IFRS 2 requires the offsetting debit entry to be expensed when the payment for goods or services does not represent an asset. The expense should be recognised as the goods or services are consumed.
The issuance of fully vested shares, or rights to shares, is presumed to relate to past service, requiring the full amount of the grant-date fair value to be expensed immediately. The issuance of shares to employees with, say, a three-year vesting period is considered to relate to services over the vesting period. Therefore, the fair value of the share-based payment, determined at the grant date, should be expensed over the vesting period.
Cash-settled share-based payments
Recorded by recognising a liability at FV by applying option pricing model and remeasured at each reporting date until settled with any changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss for the period.
IFRS 3
Business Combinations
A business combination is a transaction or event in which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses.
An acquirer of a business recognises the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition-date fair values and discloses information that enables users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the acquisition.
The acquirer can elect to measure the components of NCI in the acquiree that are present ownership interests and entitle their holders to a proportionate share of the entity’s net assets in liquidation either at fair value or at the NCI’s proportionate share of the net assets.
Adjustments to provisional values relating to facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date are permitted within one year.
Among the items recognised will be the acquisition-date fair value of contingent consideration. Changes to contingent consideration resulting from events after the acquisition date are recognised in profit or loss.
If the consideration transferred exceeds the net of the assets, liabilities and NCI, that excess is recognised as goodwill. If the consideration is lower than the net assets acquired, a bargain purchase is recognised in profit or loss.
All acquisition-related costs (e.g. finder’s fees, professional or consulting fees, costs of internal acquisition department) are recognised in profit or loss except for costs to issue debt or equity, which are recognised in accordance with IFRS 9 and IAS 32.
Business combinations achieved in stages
If the acquirer increases an existing equity interest so as to achieve control of the acquiree, the previously-held equity interest is remeasured at acquisition-date fair value and any resulting gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss.
IFRS 9
Financial Instruments
When the entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
IFRS 9 sets out requirements for recognition and measurement of financial instruments, including impairment, derecognition and general hedge accounting.
All financial instruments are initially measured at fair value plus or minus, in the case of a financial asset or financial liability not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs.
Equity investments
Equity investments held are measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value are recognised in profit or loss (FVTPL). However, if an equity investment is not held for trading, an entity can make an irrevocable election at initial recognition to recognise the fair value changes in OCI (FVTOCI) with only dividend income recognised in profit or loss. There is no reclassification to profit or loss on disposal. The impairment requirements do not apply to equity instruments.
Classificiation of financial assets
Financial assets with contractual terms that give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI) on the principal amount outstanding (the contractual cash flows test) are classified according to the objective of the business model of the entity.
1. Measurd at amortized cost: objective is to hold the financial assets to collect the contractual cash flows
2. Measured at fair value through OCI: both collect contractual cash flows and sell financial assets.
3. Measured at fair value through proft and loss: all other financial assets
Classification of financial liabilities
1. Measured at FV through PL: held for trading and designated at intiial recognition at FVTPL
2. Measured at amortised cost: all other liabilities
Measurement at Initial Recognition
1. FA and FL at FVTPL: fair value of consideration
2. Other FA and FL: FV + transaction costs
Subsequent measurement
1. FA and FL at FVTPL: fair value
2. Other FA and FL: amortised cost based on effective interest rate method
IFRS 9 Impairment
The impairment model in IFRS 9 is based on expected credit losses. It applies to:
- financial assets measured at amortised cost or
- FA at FVTOCI,
- Lease receivables (IFRS 16)
- Contract assets (IFRS 15)
- Specified written loan commitments
- Financial guarantee contracts.
Not for shares because they are measured at fair value.
Expected credit losses are required to be measured through a loss allowance at an amount equal to the 12-month expected credit losses. If the credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition of the financial instrument, full lifetime expected credit losses are recognised. This is equally true for credit-impaired financial assets for which interest income is based on amortised cost rather than gross carrying amount.
Simplified approach only for trade recevables and contract assets without significant financing component: only full lifetime expected credit losses.
IFRS 9 requires expected credit losses to reflect an unbiased and probability-weighted amount, the time value of money and reasonable and supportable information about past events, current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions.