Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Research > Hypothesis, levels of evidence, > Flashcards

Hypothesis, levels of evidence, Flashcards

1
Q

hypothesis

A
  • a tentative statement to explain certain observations or facts that requires further experimentation to be verified
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

alternate hypothesis

A
  • also known as the experimental hypothesis, the alternate hypothesis is a statement that the population parameter has a value that differs from the null hypothesis
  • in hypothesis testing, the alternate hypothesis is accepted when the null hypothesis is rejected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

null hypothesis

A
  • also known as the statistical hypothesis, the null hypothesis is a statement that the values of a population parameter is equal to some claimed value
  • tested statistically by inferential statistics.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

independent variables

A
  • the variable that is presumed to have caused or influenced the dependent variable. in research, the independent variable is what is controlled or manipulated by the researchers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

dependent variables

A
  • the response or outcome assumed to be caused by the effect of the independent variable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

p-value

A

the probability that a particular statistical result could have happened by chance

  • when the p-value is smaller than the stated value of alpha, or level of significance, the null is rejected
  • when the p-value is larger than the stated value of alpha or level of significance, the null hypothesis is not rejected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

alpha level

A

also known as the significance level, the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true, or the chance of committing a Type I error
-traditio0nal values for alpha are 0.05 and 0.01

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

type I error

A
  • alpha error
  • the error the researcher makes when wrongly deciding to reject the null hypothesis, concluding that there is a different when there is not
  • false positive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

type II error

A
  • beta error
  • the error the researcher makes when wrongly deciding not to reject the null hypothesis, concluding that there is no difference or relationship when there is. A type II error is a false negative findings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

statistically significant

A
  • a statistical conclusion made when the probability is small that the difference between groups or the relationship between variables happened by chance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

statistical power

A

-refers to the chance that a statistical test will lead to rejection of a false null hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

effect size

A
  • a measure of the magnitude of the difference between two tx or the magnitude of the relationship between two variables
  • the larger the ES, the more likely it will be statistically significant
  • ES is one of the statistical elements used to estimate sample size and perform a power analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

effect size index

A
  • a statistic that represents effect size using a standardized value
  • generally, the effect size index is calculated by taking the difference between the two groups and dividing it by the SD of one of the groups
<0.1= trivial effect
0.1-0.3 = smaLL effect
0.3-0.5 = moderate effect
>0.5 = large effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

MCID

A

the smallest difference in a pt’s condition that the pt or clinician considers worthwile and that would, in the absence of side effects and excessive cost warrant a change in the pt’s management

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

MDD

A

the minimum detectable change in a patient’s condition beyond the threshold or measurement error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

parameter

A
  • a numerical measurement describing some characteristic of a population
  • parameters are rarely known and usually estimated by statistics computed from a sample
17
Q

systematic review

A
  • a comprehensive review of the medical literature that uses explicit methods to systematically search, identify, appraise, and summarize all literature on a specific issue
  • for example, a Cochrane systematic review is a type of review aimed at providing evidence specifically in health care and health policy
18
Q

meta-analysis

A
  • a systematic review that uses a statistical technique to derive an estimate of effect size cy combining the results of several randomized controlled trials to determine the overall effectiveness of a tx. this strategy can minimize the problem of small sample size from individual studies since the pooling of trials increases the overall sample size
19
Q

RCT

A
  • a form of experimental research used to assess the relative effect of a specific intervention compared to a control condition
  • pts are randomized into a control group and at least one experimental group
  • the control group receives either no tx or a standard default tx
  • ideally the groups will be identical except for the intervention they have been randomized to receive
  • random assignment reduces the risk of bias and increases the probability that differences between the groups can attributed to the intervention
20
Q

cohort study

A
  • longitudinal observational study in which individuals with a risk factor or exposure are followed over time to compare the occurrence of a disease in the exposed group to that of the group of unexposed individuals
  • the measure of association between exposure and disease in cohort studies is the relative risk
  • cohort studies can be performed prospectively or retrospectively from historical records
  • limitations of cohort studies include the excessive length of time a study can take and the influence of other lifestyle variables that invariably result in the two groups being uniquely different
21
Q

case control study

A
  • a type of retrospective, observational study in which individuals who already have a particular disease are matched with a comparison group of individuals without the disease
  • the history of exposure or other characteristics prior to the onset of the disease is recorded through interview and other sources and compared between the two groups
22
Q

cross-sectional study

A
  • a type or observational study where the data or observations are made at only one point in time and all subjects are tested at relatively the same time
  • a cross-sectional study aims to describe relationship between a disease or condition and factors of interest that exist in a specified population at a given time
  • these studies can describe the prevalence of disease or conditions and demonstrate associations, but they cannot distinguish between newly occurring and long-established conditions, nor can they identify casual relationships about what may have precipitated the disease or condition
23
Q

case report

A

is an in-depth description of an individual’s condition or response to tx

  • a case series consists of a collection of observations of similar cases
  • case reports may be used to generate theories and hypotheses for future research
  • they cannot test hypotheses or establish cause-and -effect relationships

Research (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions