Hume Section II. The Origins of Ideas Flashcards
How does Hume introduce the difference between sensation and reflection?
“Everyone will readily allow, that there is a considerable difference between the perceptions of mind…and when he afterwards recalls to his memory the sensation, or anticipated it by his imagination”
What quote demotes thoughts as totally inferior to sensation?
“The most lively thought is still inferior to the dullest sensation”
How does Hume acknowledge the helpfulness of memory or reflection?
“our thought is a faithful mirror, and it copies its objects truly”
How does Hume distinguish thoughts/ideas from impressions?
“distinguished by their different degrees of force and vivacity”
How does Hume define impression/sensation?
“all our more lively perceptions”
What features do impressions have that ideas do not?
Incorrigible, involuntary
Describe Hume’s considerations of how we may initially perceive the mind
Hume says at first the mind seems unbounded and that we can imagine anything “except what implies an absolute contradiction”
What is the mind’s true nature according to Hume? (Copy Principle)
“though our thought seems to possess this unbounded liberty…it is really confined within very narrow limits, and that all this creative power of the mind amounts to no more than the faculty of compounding, transposing, augmenting, or diminishing the materials afforded us by the sense and experience”
What is the example of the golden mountain?
“When we think of a golden mountain, we only join to consistent ideas, gold, and mountain”; gold mountain amounts to nothing more than simple ideas of gold and mountain which we have impressions of
Give the pen example to explain why Hume’s definition of sensations and ideas is weak
- You glance at your pen on your desk per chance everyday and so according to Hume you have a sensation of this pen
- You lose your pen and are trying to describe to someone in great detail; you have an idea/thought of this pen
- Hume is committed to saying that you’re idea of the pen is less forceful and vivacious than your earlier impression; seems wrong
- If Hume concede to this point, tantamount to accepting he is implicitly committed to classifying the initial perception as an idea while the thought of the pen (more vivacious and forceful) an impression by Hume’s definition
Give the pen example to explain why Hume’s definition of sensations and ideas is weak
- You glance at your pen on your desk per chance everyday and so according to Hume you have a sensation of this pen
- You lose your pen and are trying to describe to someone in great detail; you have an idea/thought of this pen
- Hume is committed to saying that you’re idea of the pen is less forceful and vivacious than your earlier impression; seems wrong
- If Hume concede to this point, tantamount to accepting he is implicitly committed to classifying the initial perception as an idea while the thought of the pen (more vivacious and forceful) an impression by Hume’s definition
So what is Hume’s CP?
All thought can do is compound materials that ultimately derive without exception from sense experience and our inner feelings
What is the first argument Hume puts forward for his CP?
- Testing the hypothesis and always successfully reduce even the most complex ideas into simpler ones
- “we shall always find, that every idea which we examine is copied from a similar impression”
What is the second argument Hume puts forward for his CP? (N.B also works against innate ideas)
- When a defect in an organ deprives a particular category of impressions, the corresponding ideas are lacking
- “A blind man can form no notion of colours”
Issues with Hume’s arguments for CP; (explanatory weakness of simple vs. complex ideas)
- Explanatory weakness in that simple ideas cannot be broken down further
- But “Mountain”, as in simple idea from gold mountain, could be reduced into a rocky hill, snowy peak etc.
- Doesn’t sufficiently address what ideas count as simple and leaves room for simple ideas to be infinitely reduced