Human Rights Protection - United Nations Flashcards
Human Rights Commission
- set up under auspices of ECOSOC
- issuance of Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- UDHR adopted by General Assembly, non-legally binding
- 2006 replaced by Human Rights Council (under General Assembly)
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: two categories
- principal civil and political rights (right to life, liberty and security, fair trial; prohibition on torture, slavery; freedom of thought, expression; …)
- principal economic, social & cultural rights (right to work, social security, education, take part in cultural life)
UDHR transformation
1966: transformation of UDHR into “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” and “International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights” -> now legally binding
Reason: Nature of rights are different (core human rights vs. broader rights (implementation more complicated)). ICCPR: 173 states, ICESCR: 171
-> if two treaties: higher chances states will ratify at least one
Other Human Rights Treaties
e. g.:
- Elimination of Racial Discrimination (182 states)
- Child Rights (196 states)
- Women Rights (189 states)
- > no obligation to ratify treaties, hence differing numbers of contracting states
- > usually “Optional Protocols” can be ratified
Possibilities how to handle with Treaties
- no action
- signatory (expression of intent, not legally binding!)
- ratification (state party) -> domestic approval, then binding
Compliance with Treaties: monitoring mechanisms
Reporting Mechanism:
- every 5-6 years report about implementation in law and practice by MS to be submitted, not always credible (further sources and investigations needed) (Universal Periodic Review)
- result: recommendations about further implementation of treaty, express for concerns possible
Complaint Mechanism (ratification of Protocol optional):
- Individual Complaint Procedure: everyone can file complaint to the MS under which jurisdiction one lives; condition: all available national remedies must be exhausted; state has 6 months to respond; evaluation of response by Committee
- > views will be send to individual and state party -> not legally binding
- Inter-state Complaint Procedure: not often used since diplomatic relations get undermined
Independent Inquiry:
- Committee will add its own enquiry on human rights violations
-> all end with “concluding remarks”
Characteristics of the Committees
- 18 elected representatives from each state
- not bound and fully independent from home country
- 4-year term
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - further info
- common standard of achievement
- provided the foundation for many treaties
Enforcement of Human Rights
- ICCPR Committee has no power to sanction countries, only to bring cases to International Court (quasi-judical measures)
- Universal Periodic Review: topics to be addressed asked for by the Committee
Sayadi-Vinck case
Individual Complaint Procedure against Belgium:
- the two men were put on UN SC Blacklists -> travel bans, asset freezes -> no justification given, even not after found not guilty -> Belgium Court ordered government to initiate de-listing
- ICCPR complaint: Belgium held responsible for violating human rights; no compensation ever
UPR of Belgium
230 recommendations (160 accepted) given regarding:
- racial discrimination and islamophobic behaviour
- overcrowding of prisons
- ratification of Torture Convention
- establishment of Belgium National Human Rights Institute
- migrant workers rights convention (no support from Belgium)
UPR of USA
Topics:
- use of torture
- death penalty
- gun-violence
- closure of Guantanamo bay
- voting rights of criminal and detainees
- join International Criminal Court
UPR of Russia
Accepted:
- fight of corruption
Declined:
- release of political prisoners in Russia & occupied areas
- signing of Convention of Abolition of Torture
UPR of China
Accepted:
- fight poverty
- fight against terrorism
Declined/no support:
- allow independent observers for specific regions
- closure of “education facilities” for Uigurs
- publish numbers of death penalties
- unrestricted use of internet for everyone
- fair processes
- release of political prisoners
UPR of North Korea
- 130 of 200 recommendations accepted (however theory vs. practice)
- declined: access to country for human aid helpers