Home Care Flashcards

1
Q

Old belief that occlusion caused perio

A

Karolyi 1901; Stillman et al 1920)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Old belief that calculus caused perio

A

Mandel 1986

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Loe 1965

A

Abstain from oral hygiene for 3 weeks

Gingival inflammation was resolved after 1 week of resuming OH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Periodontitis defintion

Papapanou et al 2018

AAPWW

A

Periodontitis is a chronic multifactorial inflammatory disease associated with dysbiotic plaque biofilms and characterized by progresive destruction of the tooth-supporting apparatus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Lang 1973

How often to brush? Healthy patients

A

plaque removal every 48 hours was sufficient to avoid developing gingivitis

Gingivitis developed at 3-4 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Maier 2020

RCT; home care frequency for past perio patients

A

Home care every 12-24 hours prevented gingivitis in patients with a history of periodontitis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Preus 2019

Oral hygiene instruction efficacy

A

Pt given OHI 3 months before perio therapy showed SSD reduced pocket depths than those who did not receive OHI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Poor oral hygiene and implant failure

A

Poor oral hygiene has been longitudinally associated with an increased chance of
implant failure (Steenberghe et al. 1993) as well as marginal bone loss (Lindquist et al. 1996).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Renvert 2018

A

Plaque is the etiological factor for peri-implant mucositis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Heitz-Mayfield 2011

CHX + toothbrushing RCT for peri-implant mucositis

A

Half of patients (n=15 per group) took 0.5% CHX gel + toothbrushing for 1 month; other half just toothbrushing

No SSD between groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Plaque control and peri-implantitis

A

Poor plaque control is a strong predictor for peri-implantitis

Schwarz 2017

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Access to clean implants and peri-implant mucositis

A

Serino and Strom 2009
* peri-implantitis associated with poor access to clean

Pons 2021 (x-sectional study)
* SSD between improper access and** mucosal redness**
* peri-implantitis was related to self-assessment of oral hygiene measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Compliance related to

A

Good compliance:
* fewer sessions per day
* easier tasks
* Better communication skills

Bad compliance:
* higher number of devices needed
* more complex requirements
* longer treatment time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Harnacke 2012

verbal OHI vs leaflet OHI

A

Patients who received oral instructions had **better results **

This is in contrast with Glavind 1983 which showed no difference in type of OHI communication style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Tonetti 2015

Steps for achieving improved home care

A
  1. goal setting
  2. planning
  3. self-monitoring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wilson 1984

Pt compliance for maintenance

A

private practice patients requiring maintenance; 8 year study

  • 16% complied
  • 49% were erratic compliers
  • 34% non-compliers
17
Q

Bleeding on brushing significance

A
  • Good indicator of peri-implant and periodontal disease
  • good predictor for BOP (Tonetti 2020)
18
Q

Subg penetration depth by cleaning method

A

Toothbrush: 1mm
Floss: 2-3.5mm
Interdental brush: 2-2.5 mm

All of the above were Waerhaug studies

SubG irrigation: 50% of pocket depth (Eakle et al 1986)

19
Q

Toothbrushing techniques

A
  1. Vetical strokes
  2. Fone’s circular (Fone 1934)
  3. Bass (1948)
  4. Modfieid Bass (Bass +Stillmans)
  5. Stillmans vibratory (1932)
  6. Charters vibratory (1948)
  7. Horizontal scrub
20
Q

Bergenholtz 1984

Study comparing toothbrushing techniques

A

Bass technique showed best ability for plaque removal

21
Q

Yaacob et al 2014

Chochrane review of manual vs powered toothbrushing

A

Powered toothbrushes more effective at reducing plaque and gingivitis

22
Q

Sambunjak 2011

Systematic review on flossing efficacy

A

Toothbrushing + flossing showed only a modest improvement in reducing gingival inflammation

Resulted in controversy after the new york times released an article saying flossing was unnecessary

23
Q

AAP/ADA 2016 recommendations for home oral hygiene

A

Brush 2x per day for 2 minutes, floss (or use interdental cleaner) once per day

24
Q

Oral irrigators vs flossing

Costa et al 2019

A

Brushing + flossing + oral irrigator group had reduced perio recurrence compared to just B+F group

25
Q

Oral irrigator penetration depth

Eakle et al 1986

A

Angled at 45 or 90 degrees

Penetration depth ~50% of pocket depth

26
Q

CHX popularity for oral rinse

A
  1. antimicrobial
  2. bacteriocidal and static effects
  3. high substantivity
  4. lack of systemic toxicity
  5. bacterial resistance

Limitations:
* extrinsic pigmentation
* taste alterations

27
Q

Toothpaste necessity for plaque removal

A

No evidence that toothpaste increases plaque removal compared to toothbrushing alone

Valkenberg et al 2016

Plaque removal with toothpaste: 49%, without 50%

Mechanical effects of toothbrushing are sole reason for plaque removal

28
Q

Sodium lauryl sulfate

Sabri 2023 systematic review

A

Conflicting evidence

SLS is a risk indicator for prolonged oral wound healing time, recurrent apthous stomatitis

29
Q

Ramfjord et al 1981

Perio maintenance

A

78 patients followed for 8 years

3 month maintenance maintained attachment levels and pocket depths

30
Q

Cortellini, Pini-Prato and Tonetti, 1994

Regenerative therapy +/- maintenance

A

Sites treated with GTR, followed for 4 years

Pts receiving regular recalls had 50-fold reduced risk of attachment loss compared to non-compliant patients

31
Q

Delgado 2021

Xylimelts

A

Xylimets had less enamel and dentin loss (better compared to other products)