HLM Exam #2 Flashcards
Benefits of testing
direct: helps memory
indirect: inventive to study and ask questions
recitation
trying to recite something and consulting the text when you fail
Testing effect
those who take a test when learning (usually an additional test after the study phase before a real test) have better memory
Is the testing effect true even without feedback?
yes
Gates (1917): varied amount of time reading and reciting
findings: the longer you spent in recitation (manipulating information and trying to recall it) the better you did
Spitzer (1939): timing of tests
- the earlier the test is taken after learning the better you do
- closer test 1 is to test 2 is better
Spitzer (1939): testing and forgetting
taking a test stabilizes forgetting
- more tests taken is better memory (“testing effect”)
Testing effect: should you study all the content and test all the content?
you should TEST all words - you can only study what you got wrong but to have maximum effect, restudying and retesting all words is best for learning
Which is better - repeated studying or testing?
repeated testing
- students think they will do worse but do better
- testing ALL words is the best (not just what you got wrong)
Immediate recall and the testing effect
restudying is best for immediate recall (cramming)
later recall and the testing effect
testing helps LTM recall at a later date
Feedback and the testing effect
feedback gives more power to this effect but it works with and without feed back
Spacing Effect
review sessions are more effective when distributed or spaced out rather than massed
Keppel (1967): spacing and massed vs. retention interval
for a short retention interval: spaced and massed are the same
for a long retention interval: spaced is better than massing
spacing improves…
generalization and transfer (especially for factual and higher knowledge)
What test formats show the spacing effect
ALL: recognition, free recall and generation
What is the optimal spacing?
5-10% of the time between encoding and test
- the longer the delay the longer you should space
- shorter spacing gaps better for a short delay
forgetting and the spacing effect
forgetting becomes less rapid with more spaced practice
encoding variability theory
the item and its context are stored at encoding
- the more different contexts you study in (aka more spaced practice), the more likely you will be able to match the context on a test
deficient processing theory
during massed practice, familiar information receives little attention
- feels boring / already known
Remindings
when you study a second time, you bring to mind when you first learned or studied that info
Interleaving
studying different things during one study session
blocked practice
studying the same thing for a long time and then moving on to something else for a long time
interleaved practice
mixing subjects when studying
Blocked vs. interleaved feelings AND short vs. long term effects
people feel better on blocked practice (will do better on short term practice) but will ultimately do better in an interleaved condition
Induction learning
When you identify something or learn a rule by observing (ie the artists and asked to identify a new one of their paintings)
Spaced retrieval practice
testing with spacing –> very good for memory
Implicit Memory
not intending to draw upon prior experiences but you do anyways
How do we measure priming? `
% studied correct - % non-studied correct = % priming
Serial pattern learning
if there are embedded sequences in a task participants will go faster (even if they are unaware these patterns exist)
priming
benefit of recent prior experience
implicit memory
change in task performances due to recent prior experience (priming) - without intent to use experience
explicit memory
willful attempt to retrieve
How do we test explicit memory?
- free / serial recall
- cued recall
- recognition
- paired association learning
Perceptual implicit memory tests
- word fragment identification
- picture fragment identification
- anagram solution
- word stem completion
- word identification (brief presentation)
- word identification in noise
Conceptual implicit memory tests
1.) general knowledge: primed with hint about subject, faster recall to a related question
2.) category instance generation: say first 8 fruits that come to mind (know what these usually are and prime an unusual fruit to see what happens)
3.) preference judgements: if you have seen/experienced something recently, you usually like it more
Amnesia and Implicit Memory
priming effects hold for people with amnesia (even though they don’t remember it) –> shows there is not a problem with STM transfer to LTM in amnesiacs (information is getting to LTM but it can not be retrieved)
Dissociation
Forgetting and Priming
Over a week, no words were forgotten if you were primed with them but forgetting for recognition increases
level of processing and priming
- no effect on perceptual priming - all levels have the same % correct if primed
Generation effect and priming
perceptual identification (implicit memory test): generating is the worst
- if you are seeing a degraded image, it is better if you have seen it before rather than generated it
Picture Superiority Effect and Priming
if it is WORD FRAGMENT identification, words are remembered better
if it is PICTURE FRAGMENT identification, picture superiority effect holds
this is the best if in study phase, you are given a fragment and told what it is (you have already processed the degraded stimulus)
Conceptual implicit tests and patterns more similar to explicit or implicit memory?
tend to show the same patterns as explicit memory (deep encoding and generation effects hold)
Brain activity and priming
more brain activity if you are NOT primed (working harder)
Types of memory distortions
1) benign: not harmful (think you took a pill but didn’t)
2) serious: harmful (remembering a crime wrong)
3) fantastic: out of the ordinary and extreme
misleading questions
affect recollection
Enhancing memory and reconstruction
Enhancing memory through:
1) deeper processing
2) testing
3) mental images
can increase the likelihood of a false memory
Boundary Extension (Intraub 1989)
we zoom out and fill in details when remembering an image or scene
- knowing about this effect does not stop it from happening
Influence of Verbal labels
- what you label an image as changes how you remember it (sunglasses vs. dumbbell)
- we often encounter nonverbal stimuli: we attach a verbal label to these and that changes them
pragmatic implications
not logically implied –> pragmatically implied (the baby stayed awake all night - we would remember the baby cried all night)
Associations with non-presented critical lure
If we are given a list of words that are related and the related word is not given, we will remember it as given anyways.
- they also said they “remembered” this word
Remembering vs. Knowing
remembering: can remember the exact moment of encoding (what happened directly before or after, sounds etc)
knowing: you don’t know how you know it, you just do