HIV Flashcards
what is the sensitivity of HIV screening tests?
high sensitivity (>98%)
What do HIV screening tests usually detect?
- antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2
4th gen - also detects - HIV-1 p24 antigen
Seological tests for HIV are usually based on what laboratory assay?
Serological tests - usually use
enzyme immuno assays (EIA)
4th generation (antibody and antigen) tests - more sensitive than antibody only tests
Why are 4th generation HIV tests recommended?
4th generation = antibody and antigen tests,
More sensitive than antibody only tests
Better in detecting or excluding HIV when a recent exposure has occurred (<4-6 weeks).
In what situation may there be a false negative HIV test?
A test can be falsely negative very early in the window period
e.g. If a high risk HIV exposure occurred in the previous 4-6 weeks s
A negative test with a 4th generation (antigen + antibody test) EIA at 4 weeks excludes HIV infection with a high degree of certainty.
(a few cases described of prolonged seroconversion, usually with simultaneous other viral illness)
What confirmation is required of a positive HIV screening test?
Confirmation by second and third serological test
what is an equivocal or indeterminate HIV test?
An equivocal / indeterminate tests = a positive screening test which is negative when tested by a second and third serological test.
Causes of an equivocal or indeterminate HIV test
Usually caused by a false positive reaction
Could be an early seroconversion when the screening test is more sensitive than the confirmatory tests.
Management of an equivocal or indeterminate HIV test
Repeat the sample 1 wk later
Will identify seroconversion if the confirmation test(s) become positive and/or p24Ag or HIV viral load is detectable
Patient can be reassured of false positive reaction if the repeat blood, drawn at least 1 week later, is negative
What test can be used for HIV incidence testing
Antibody avidity testing
Can predict whether the infection occurred in the preceding 4-5 months.
(sensitivity + specificity of 96% and 97%)
What principle foes HIV Antibody avidity testing utilise?
The test exploits the principle that the initial antibodies bind less strongly (low avidity) to antigen compared to antibodies produced later as part of the evolving immune response.
Can predict whether the infection occurred in the preceding 4-5 months.
When can HIV seroconversion be diagnosed?
Seroconversion can be diagnosed when the 4th generation screening test is positive but a confirmatory (3rd generation) test is negative.
A p24Ag or viral load test needs to be positive.
Evolving line blot assays with additional bands developing on follow-up sampling can also be used.
Sensitivity of HIV tests?
HIV tests - incredibly sensitive
>98%
due to the high levels of HIV antibodies produced by an infected person
Specificity of HIV tests?
specificity >98%
When might salivary HIV diagnostic tests be useful?
for children / severe needle phobia
what is the correct storage of HIV samples
No refrigeration of samples is necessary unless stored for more than 1-2 days.
What proportion of new HIV diagnoses are MSM?
UK in 2015
MSM = 46% of new HIV diagnoses
What is a late HIV diagnosis?
For public health monitoring - late HIV diagnosis = CD4 cell count <350 within 3m of HIV diagnosis
Very late HIV diagnosis = CD4 count <200.
What is the significance of a late HIV diagnosis?
People diagnosed late are at increased risk of developing an AIDS-defining illness
+ have 10x increased risk of death in the year following their diagnosis
HIV prevention strategies
Condom use
PEPSE
Serosorting/stategic positioning - mixed data
PREP
Male circumcision - data from Africa suggests MC protects heterosexual men from acquiring HIV
Reduce the number of partners
What is the approximate rate of STS and HIV co-infection
Syphilis-HIV coinfection remains high
Up to 40% of cases of syphilis being in HIV infected MSM
How may being HIV +ve affect the presentation of STS
some minor differences syphiis presentation in HIV +ve patients include:
- primary syphilis- up to 70% present with >1 chancre + larger / deeper lesions
- 25% present with concomitant lesions of primary and secondary stages at presentation
- atypical and severe presentations of syphilis occur more frequently (still a v small minority)
- Syphilis can cause transient increase in the viral load and decrease in the CD4 cell count - resolve after treatment
Differences in managing STS in HIV +ve patients
- HIV patients are more likely to present with neurological syphilis in early syphilis
- HIV infection associated with increased risk of neurological complications in the short and long term
- consider treating all HIV patients with a neurosyphilis drug regimens given the high rates of positive CSF
Globally what proportion of people living with HIV are women?
Women >15 years = approximately 50% of global adults living with HIV
- The burden of disease in women is not evenly distributed worldwide
In the UK what proportion of people living with HIV are women?
In the UK in 2015 31% of patients accessing HIV care were women
What is the primary aim of ART?
To prevent mortality and morbidity associated with chronic HIV infection
Effective
Tolerable
Low drug toxicity
Improve physical + psychological well-being
Reduce onward transmission - sexual, MTCT
What proportion of patients on ART achieve a suppressed HIV VL?
93% (2013 data)
Before prescribing ART what topics should be discussed with the patient to assess their readiness to take therapy?
Understanding of HIV therapy
Perceptions of personal need for ART
Concerns about ART / specific ARV drugs,
Concerns re social consequences (disclosure/ lifestyle interference)
Confidence re adherence
Psychological issues / concerns
Socio-economic factors (incl. poverty, housing, immigration status, domestic violence)
Pregnancy or parenting plans
Factors affecting adherence to ARVs
adverse effects
Social beliefs
Cultural beliefs.
Depression sig. associated with low adherence [1
Anxiety
Problematic drug or alcohol use
Socio-economic status - poverty, non-employment, unsettled immigration status, lack of supportive network
when should ARVs be started for a patient presenting with an AIDS defining illness?
Individuals presenting with an AIDS-defining infection
Or a serious bacterial infection and a CD4 count <200
Start ART within 2 weeks of initiation of specific antimicrobial chemotherapy
when should ARVs be started for a HIV diagnosis
At time of diagnosis
What was the ACTG 5164 study
and what did it show?
ACTG 5164 study
demonstrated fewer AIDS progressions/deaths
And improved cost-effectiveness
when ART was commenced within 14 days treatment for acute infection (e.g. PCP)
Rather than ART initiation at the completion of antibiotic treatment
definition of Primary HIV infection (PHI)
Primary HIV infection (PHI) = HIV infection within a maximum of 6 months from the estimated time of HIV transmission.
Diagnosed based on laboratory test results
Which studies showed clinical benefit to starting immediate ART over deferral
START, TEMPRANO and HPTN 052 trials
What factors would encourage prioritisation of early ART initiation
primary HIV infection
low initial CD4 T cell counts <350
high plasma viral loads (>100,000 copies HIV RNA)
short test intervals - diagnosis within 12 weeks of a previous negative test
Neurological involvement
Any AIDS-defining illness
What was the SMART study
and what did it show?
The SMART study compared 2 ART strategies in HIV-infected adults with CD4 counts > 350
1st group = viral suppression strategy = continuous ART to maximally suppress HIV replication.
2nd group = CD4 count-guided ART interruption strategy (drug conservation) = involved stopping ART when CD4 counts >350 and re-initiating ART when CD4 <250
treatment interruption = increased all-cause mortality
seen regardless of the lowest point of CD4 cell count.
Potential downsides to starting ART in primary HIV infection
Ambivalence to ART at a time of emotional challenges - an risk poor adherence and the development of drug resistance
Patient may be in a vulnerable psychological state and ll-prepared to commit to starting long-term treatment.
Potential benefits to starting ART in primary HIV infection
Better probability of immunological recovery to normal levels
Patient may be comforted to know they are taking immediate control of their infection
Reduced risk of onward transmission at a time of v high VL
Reduction in morbidity
Clinical benefit from starting ART irrespective of CD4 count (START, TEMPRANO and HPTN052 trials)
Limitation of viral reservoir
Advice for reduction in transmission of HIV
Initiation of ARVs will reduce the risk of onward sexual transmission - discuss as a part of safer sex messages
Undetectable VL for 6m + means it isn’t possible transmit HIV (U=U)
Condoms
Water based lubricant
Avoid sharing needles and injecting equipment
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEPSE)
Antenatal screening
How soon after initiating ART does the VL become undetectable?
Taking ART does not result in immediate viral suppression.
Most achieve viral suppression by 3–6 months
Integrase inhibitors are characterised by more rapid viral suppression - most undetectable by 1–3 months
What is the PARTNER study
and what did it show?
PARTNER study demonstrated a protective effect of viral suppression in serodifferent couples
HIV-positive person on suppressive ART - VL <200
condomless sex acts - 16,800 in MSM and 28,000 in heterosexual couples
no cases of HIV transmission
86 would have been expected based on previous incidence studies
Advice for sero-discordant heterosexual people wishing to conceive
If fully suppressed on ART with undetectable VL for 6m+
U=U
Sex without condom around time of ovulation = timed UPSI = very little to no risk
PrEP does not add any benefit but may carry SE - not advised in current guidelines
Sperm washing not recommended in the context of viral suppression
What ART is recommended to start for new diagnoses of HIV
therapy-naïve patients with HIV
recommend starting ART with 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) as the backbone
plus 1 of: ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r), non- nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or integrase inhibitor (INI)
e.g. Truvada (Tenofovir-DF and emtricitabine) and Raltegravir
What drugs are in Truvada
Tenofovir-DF and emtricitabine
What drugs are in Kivexa
Abacavir and lamivudine
What test is required prior to starting a patient on Abacavir
HLA-B * 57:01
What is the HLA-B * 57:01 test done for?
To determine if a patient is likely to have a hypersensitivity reaction to Abacavir
What are critical outcomes to consider when choosing which ART to start?
Viral suppression at week 48/96, proportion with virological failure, proportion developing resistance, proportion discontinuing for adverse events, proportion with grade 3/4 adverse events
In which patients must Abacavir not be used
HLA-B * 57:01 positive
What is the main risk associated with abacavir
abacavir and cardiovascular disease
Abacavir is not to be used in individuals at high risk of CVD
What is the main risk associated with tenofovir-DF
Renal toxicity
tenofovir-DF is not used in people with stage 3–5 CKD or at high risk of progression of CKD
Why is tenofovir-AF different to tenofovir-DF
Tenofovir alefenamide = new formulation of tenofovir
Significantly lower plasma concentrations of tenofovir
Hypothesis = lower plasma concentrations
should = less negative impact on renal and bone markers
More potential drug interactions for tenofovir-AF that do not apply to tenofovir-DF
Which nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone is commonly used for starting ARVs in treatment naive HIV patients?
Tenofovir-DF and emtricitabine
or
Tenofovir-AF and emtricitabine
Alternative - Abacavir and lamivudine
Which third agent is commonly used for starting ARVs in treatment naive HIV patients?
start combination ART containing one of atazanavir/r, darunavir/r, dolutegravir, elvitegravir/c, raltegravir rilpivirine
or efavirenz is an acceptable alternative third agent
Main adverse events from efavirenz-based regimens
Potential for significant CNS toxicity
Higher risk of suicidality
what is Cobicistat
Cobicistat is an inhibitor of CYP3A isozymes
Used as a pharmacokinetic booster of other antiretroviral drugs
Alternative to ritonavir- boosted PI
What is the current evidence regarding PI monotherapy for initial HIV treatment
Data limited
Associated with lower rates of virological suppression at 48 weeks
Emergence of PI mutations
No significant differences in tolerability
NOT recommended
What is the risk of low adherence to ART for HIV treatment
Associated with:
- drug resistance
- risk of disease progression
- risk of progression to AIDS
- death
- increased risk of HIV transmission to others
- increased costs of treatment
What factors may cause non-adherence
Both intentional and unintentional causes
Unintentional non-adherence is linked to limitations in capacity or resources that reduce the ability to adhere to treatment as intended.
Intentional non-adherence is a result of a decision informed by beliefs, emotions or preferences
Benefits of using single tablet regimens for HIV treatment
Improved adherence
Reduced selective adherence
Patient preference
Improvement in quality of life
What drug interactions should be considered when dispensing ARVs
methadone contraceptives anti-epileptics antidepressants lipid-lowering agents acid-reducing agents certain antimicrobials (e.g. clarithromycin, minocycline and fluconazole) some anti-arrhythmics TB therapy anti-cancer drugs immunosuppressants phosphodiesterase inhibitors anti-hepatitis C virus therapy
For what reasons may ART need to be interrupted?
Once ART has been started it should be continued.
frequent interruptions or interruptions >1-2 days should only be considered in exceptional circumstances.
e. g.
- Severe drug toxicity (e.g. hepatotoxicity).
- Severe psychological distress.
How long of an interruption in ART use is usually ok
An interruption of 1–2 days can usually be managed
Unlikely to be associated with adverse outcomes
Causes of virological failure on ART
Partial HIV drug resistance Extensive resistance X4 tropic virus Poor adherence Unsuccessful retention in care Sporadic detectable HIV RNA “blips” intolerance to the current regimen pharmacokinetics drug interactions
What is the virological failure rate on first-line NNRTI-based regimens in the UK
18%
Approximately 4% fail in the first year
Definition of virological suppression
Achieving and maintaining a VL level <50 copies/mL.
Definition of virological failure
Virological failure = incomplete virological response after commencing treatment or evidence of confirmed virological rebound to >200 copies/mL.
Definition of incomplete virological response
Incomplete virological response = 2 consecutive VL >200 after 24 weeks
without ever achieving VL <50
Definition of virological rebound
Virological rebound = failure to maintain a VL <50 on two or more consecutive occasions
Definition of Low-level viraemia
Low-level viraemia = a persistent VL between 50–200
Definition of a Virological blip
Virological blip = after virological suppression, a single VL between 50 and 200 copies/mL followed by an
undetectable result
Management of a virological blip
Virological blip = A single VL 50–200 copies/mL preceded and followed by an undetectable VL
Usually not a clinical concern
- clinical vigilance
- adherence reinforcement
- check for possible interactions
- repeat testing within 2–6 weeks depending on ARV regimen
Management of a virological blip where a single VL is >200
investigate
rapid re-test
+/- genotypic resistance test
May be indicative of virological failure
Management of HIV and TB co-infection
All patients with HIV TB co-infection should start ART
If CD4 count <50 start ART as soon as TB treatment is
tolerated - wherever possible within 2 weeks
If CD4 count ≥50 defer ART until 8 - 12 weeks of TB treatment. - esp if difficulties with drug interactions / adherence / toxicities
Which ART combination is recommend first-line in TB/HIV co-infection
Tenofovir-DF + emtricitabine (Truvada)
+ Efavirenz
When do you start ARVs for HIV and HBV coinfection when HBV requires treatment
Start ART promptly
Include tenofovir-DF and emtricitabine
or tenofovir-AF and emtricitabine
When do you start ARVs for HIV and HBV coinfection when HBV does not require treatment
Start ART - not as urgent
Include tenofovir-DF and emtricitabine
or tenofovir-AF and emtricitabine
When do you start ARVs for HIV and HCV coinfection when HCV treatment is to start start immediately
Start ART before HCV treatment commenced
Acceptable to defer if CD4 cell count >500 cells/μL - discuss viral hepatitis specialist
Which ARVs have good antiviral activity against both HIV and HBV.
Tenofovir-DF
tenofovir-AF
emtricitabine
lamivudine
Impact of HIV confection on HCV infection
HIV impacts HCV infection.
- higher HCV viral loads,
- faster rates of fibrosis progression
- increased risk of cirrhosis
- more frequent development of end-stage liver disease / hepatocellular carcinoma / liver-related death
- The efficacy of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) lessens as the CD4 cell count declines
When to start ART in patients with AIDS-defining malignancies = Kaposi sarcoma, high-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and invasive cervical cancer a
Commence ART promptly regardless of CD4 cell count or HIV viral load
Kaposi sarcoma
High-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Invasive cervical cancer
When should we start ARVs in patients with HIV-associated nephropathy
start ART immediately irrespective of CD4 cell count
When should we start ARVs in patients with end-stage kidney disease who are suitable candidates for renal transplantation
start ART immediately
Effect of starting ARVs in patients with HIV-associated nephropathy
HIV-associated nephropathy - typically encountered in black individuals with advanced immunodeficiency and detectable HIV RNA levels
ART = renal histological improvement, trend towards delayed progression to end-stage kidney disease
Which ARVs are associated with reductions in eGFR
tenofovir-DF
atazanavir
lopinavir