Hitlers appointment as chancellor of Germany in 1933 was due more to the weakness of his opponents than Nazi strengths - How far do you agree? Flashcards
Why was Papen humiliated on September 12th
Reichstag produced a ‘vote of no confidence’
What were the results of Papen’s election?
512 to 42
What was Papen’s reaction the the vote?
Dissolves parliament and arranges a new election
What did the vote highlight?
Government won’t function without a proper leader.
Why was time on Papen’s side?
Nazi morale/funds low - vote reduced to 33.1% (Nov) - 196 seats
What would cause Hitler to join the government?
If he was chancellor
What did P declare when he became frustrated?
Martial law + presidential dictatorship
Who opposed P’s terms? Why?
Schleicher - believed support for the Nazis couldn’t be ignored
What did Hindenburg hear and what was his reaction?
Army’s lack of confidence - demanded resignation of Papen
When was Schleicher appointed?
2nd December 1933
What was S’s aims?
Achieve political stability through:
- Support from left and trade unions (suggested public works)
- Split Nazi’s and attract the socialist wing (Strasser)
What role did he ask Strasser to fulfil?
Vice chancellor
Why did Schleicher fail?
- Trade unions sceptical of motives
- public works alienated landowners/businessmen
Why couldn’t Strasser accept the role?
Hitler more influential - fears of uprising - prompted to resign
Papen/Schleicher Failure - EVALUATION
Both accentuated that the rise of Nazism was inevitable and couldn’t be ignored - Hitler strength
Who did the Weimar face hostility from?
Junkers - many worked against the interests of Weimar GER