History 130 Part III Flashcards
Big Three end of WWII
Britain (Churchill), Soviet Union (Stalin), US (Truman)
Formation of Two Worlds post-WWII
Soviet Union’s need for security & isolation too big for Stalin to situate Soviet Union w/in US led intl order
Soviet non-participation in Bretton Woods
Soviet Union not going to participate in liberal postwar economic order
Widening US-Soviet relations 1945-46
structural hostility between east & west
Kennan’s Long Telegram (1946)
- deep reservoir of Russian anti-westernism
- Marxist Leninist ideology
hostility inevitable, reconciliation impossible
Churchill’s Iron Curtain 1946
curtain has descended on Europe, Soviet Union threat to peace/stability
American confusion on Stalin’s ambitions 1946
whether Soviet Union will be willing to coexist peacefully w/ west
whether Soviet Union trying to expand its domain in Europe
Stalin’s mixed pattern in Eastern Europe
works w/ local communist parties to establish government power, but elsewhere more willing to coexist w/ free postwar Europe
Turkey Crisis 1946
Crisis between Turkey & Soviet Union over Dardanelles Straits
Soviets demand Turkey gives them right to free navigation of Strait
Truman sends aircraft carrier to Mediterranean as show of strength
Stalin backs down
Iran Crisis 1946
Shah requests Soviet Union remove troops they brought to Iran during WWII
Soviet Union refuses
US intervenes on behalf of Iran
Stalin backs down
Mid-term election 1960
Rightward shift
Truman now dealing w/ Republicans in Congress
Harder to get spending packages through
Europe’s postwar crisis
cities destroyed, economic misery
misery could lead to war & radicalization
Truman proposes financial assistance
Britain’s postwar predicament
British empire beaten by WWII
Let’s go of India
Tries holding onto Palestinian mandate
Greek Civil War (1946-1949)
communists win war, want to put communists back in power
Britain ends support for anticommunist government in Greece
Question of how US will intervene
Truman Doctrine (1947)
US commits to providing assistance to free peoples everywhere struggling to retain independence against hostile external forces
Implications of Truman Doctrine
Charter for US embroilment everywhere
Marshall Plan (1948)
13B to help Europe’s socioeconomic crisis
Empowers Europeans to import goods from America
German Problem post-WWII
End of WWII Britain & France incapable of feeding Germany
Want to stabilize Germany to be able to stand on its own
Britain, US, and France merge their occupation zones
Give Marshall Aid
Soviet Union response to integration of West Bloc
1947 Stalin worried rehabilitation of Germany is being done to use Germany against Soviet Union
Stalin takes steps to secure east Germany against rehabilitated west German state
Eastern Europe 1947-48
Stalin consolidates East bloc
Stalinist regimes created in Eastern European countries
Eastern Europe transformed into ideological sphere of influence
Origins of Berlin Crisis 1948
Culimination of struggle for Germany’s fate starting in 1946/47
Currency Reform 1948
western powers have integrated their zones & undertake monetary reform by introducing new currency
Stalin sees reform as confirmation of western desire to use Germany against Soviet Union
Stalin’s blockade in Berlin
Closes West’s access to Berlin
Resolution of Berlin Crisis
Western powers resupply civilians of Berlin via airlift
Stalin backs down
Permanent US military role in Europe
1949 US enacts NATO
Military alliance debate shifts 1947-49
1947 Britain proposes military union w/ involvement of US → US unwilling to commit to Britain plan for western union of military powers
1948 West European Union created (limited version of what Britain wanted)
1949 Truman decides to committ to NATO
Origins of NATO
Military alliance (not political organization)
Designed to counter Germany & resolve Germany problem
Two purposes of NATO
- Anti-Soviet alliance
- Solves problem of Germany’s threat to security of Europe
Crises of 1949
Spring 1949 things going West’s way → late summer/fall takes turn
3 symptoms of upheavel in 1949
- August 1949 Soviet Union tests atomic bomb
- September 1949 Mao ZeDong delcares victory in China, People’s Republic of China born
- Domestic political mood in US takes anticommunist turn
Fate of East Asia after WWII
Bombing of Japan during WWII creates vacuum in Japanese occupied China & Southeast Asia
Japan still in command of a lot of Chinese territory at end of WWII
China after WWII
1945 two rival claims to leadership in China: Chinese Nationalist Party (Shek, Kuomintang) & Chinese Communist Party (Mao ZeDong)
Two parties had come to truce to fight Japan in 1937, but never came to full collaboration
- Nationalist party bore costs of fighting Japanese
- ZeDong avoided overengagement in fighting Japanese
Communist party in stronger position when war ends
Decolonization of Manchuria
1945 Soviet Union occupies Manchuria, Japanese forces surrender to Soviets
Stalin plays both sides:
- Agrees w/ nationalists to delay departure of Soviet forces until Kuomintang can take over Manchuria government
- Secretly encourages Chinese communists to bolster their position in Manchuria
US airlifts nationalist forces into Manchuria to help them gain strength to inherit political responsibility
Soviet w/drawal from province creates power vaccum that Chinese communists ready to fill
Two Factors in Chinese Civil War
- Power vaccum that exists after Japan’s defeat
- Unresolved conflict between nationalists & communists over postwar political rule
Chinese Civil War: KMT’s 1946 offensive
Nationalists launch offensive to destroy Mao’s communist party
Nationalists military victory doesn’t end Civil War
Chinese Civil War: CCP Counteroffensive
Civil War moves in favor of CCP
Factors of Civil War & CCP’s success
- CCP well organized & highly disciplined
- Nationalist party exhausted its military capabilities fighting Japanese during WWII
- Communists benefited from adept military & strategic leadership
Origins of Sino-Soviet alliance
Mao’s 1949 trip to Moscow
Sino-Soviet Treaty (1950)
Commits China & Soviet Union to security agreement
Commits Soviet Union to support postwar China’s economic reconstruction/development
Mao wants to get help from Soviet Union to make China modern
Implications of Sino-Soviet alliance for Cold War
US thinks Sino-Soviet alliance will dominate Eurasia
Domestic anticommunism
Belief treason in government (wasn’t)
McCarthy leads anticommunism
McCarthy argued US government filled w/ communists & treachery was explanation for Cold War setbacks in 1949
Implications of anticommunism for Truman
Critical of Truman Cold War strategy
Second half 1949 setbacks: Soviet bomb, loss of China, emergence of domestic anticommunism
NSC-68 analysis
Survival amid globalization demands engagement
World communism is monolithic, dynamic, cohesive
Soviet Union urgent threat
Democratic institutions make US unprepared for war
NSC-68 recommendations
- Continuation of present strategy (Kennan)
→ not credible bc isn’t working - Reversion to prewar isolationism
→ ludicrous, opposite of what Truman wants - Immediate, preemptive war
→ place holder option, no one arguing for war - Rapid build up of political, economic, military strength of free world
→ favored option, continue Kennan’s containment, no direct confrontation
Kennan’s containment
Focused on Western Europe & Japan
Exploit tensions in communist world
Socialize Soviet Union into more liberal international order
Nitze’s NSC-68
Encirclement of communist world
Communist world as monolithic bloc
Defeat of Soviet Union
Truman’s troubles w/ NSC-68
Thinks NSC-68 too radical/disruptive
Says US economy can’t afford to support domestic welfare state he wants to build
Origins of Korean War (1950-1953)
End of WWII Korean peninsula occuped by US in South & Soviet Union in North
Rhee: anticommunist in South
Kim II-Sung: communist in North
North Korea attacks South Korea
External actors in Korean War
Kim tells Stalin he wants to go to war to unify peninsula & create communist government
Kim tells Stalin Mao thinks this is great idea
Kim goes to Mao saying Stalin thinks it’s great idea
North Korean attack & UN response
US mobilizes coalition w/in UN Security Council to provide military assistance to South Korea
Soviets boycotting Council
Waging of Korean War
Fighting first good for North Koreans then for UN forces
Inchon Landin and MacArthur’s 1950 offensive
Stages landing behind North Korean offensive line
Launches counter offensive towards Yellow River
PCR/USSR intervention in Korea
Mao authorizes Chinese combat forces
End 1950 stalemate on 39th parallel
US rollback debate in Korea
MacArthur advocates for US advance into China
Truman recalls MacArthur
Implications of rollback
- Political message: civilian supremacy in matters of war/peace will be preserved
- Geopolitical message: US won’t undertake risky military escalation of Cold War by rolling back communist influence where it’s already well-established
- Truman’s rollback establishes geopolitical limits in which US will wage Cold War
Implications of Korean War
Failure of Truman administration is his inability to reconcile Cold War commitments US makes w/ domestic fiscal realities of US
Sharp increase in military spending 1949-53 by Truman
Eisenhower Background
Apolitical military leader
Committed to structure of Cold War commitments Truman has built
International figure
Eisenhower’s Two Policy Problems
- Military fiscal escalation under Truman
- Ending Korean War
- Agreement establishing 38th parallel as line of demarcation
Eisenhower’s NSC-162/2 (1953)
- Containment
- Political & economic strengthing of war, nonmilitary methods of confrontation - Deterrence
- Security perimeter around USSR, peaceful coexistence - Liberation
-Use of political, economic, psychological means to roll back Soviet power in Eastern Europe
Eisenhower’s New Look
Reaffirmation of Truman’s containment w/ new elements
Nuclear weapons
Military pacts
Propaganda
Conventional forces
Non-nuclear military capabilities
Cold War is conventional & nuclear competition
Soviets have conventional advantage
Strategic nuclear weapons
Destroy enemy’s capacity to wage war & terrorize people
Tactical nuclear weapons
For battlefield use, destroy enemy’s military formations
Strategic defense
Stop inbound nuclear weapons
Deterrence
State w/ nuclear weapons refrains from using them in fear of destruction
1950s/60s deterrence becomes default solution to safer world
Nuclear stability vs Nuclear abolitionist arguments