historical foundations Flashcards

1
Q

who is William James?

A

first psychologist circa 1875

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

who is Kurt Lewin?

A

first social psychologist circa 1945

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who is William McDougall?

A
  • wrote one of the first textbooks on social psych, which propagated scientific racism (circa 1921)
  • identified psychological qualities associated with “superior” racial groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the Johnson-Reed Act?

A
  • 1924
  • a quota imposed on immigrants that disproportionately favoured immigrants from Northern and Western Europe
  • justified based on eugenics research and other forms of scientific racism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is social Darwinism?

A

“survival of the fittest”: existing disparities between social groups were justified as reflecting innate differences between more and less worthy groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the main critique of social Darwinism?

A
  • naturalistic fallacy: what we observe in the natural world is not necessarily how the world ought to be
  • also ethically questionable implications (eg. forced sterilization)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

who coined the terms “ingroup”, “outgroup” and “ethnocentrism”?

A

Sumner in his book “Folkways”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the main argument in Sumner’s “Folkways”?

A
  • we have a fundamental need to be part of a group
  • self-identity is strongly tied to group identity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the thesis of Lippmann’s “Public Opinion”?

A
  • the modern world is chaotic and disorderly and people have a tendency and necessity to oversimplify it (i.e., stereotype)
  • stereotypes are a cognitive shortcut that arise from a need for abstraction
  • recognizes how cultural influences and expectations shape the way we view the world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were the findings of Katz and Braly’s Princeton Trilogy Strategies?

A
  • relied on self-reported stereotyped beliefs that people held about other groups
  • found that people have a motivated perception of stereotypes (i.e., confirmation bias plays a role in perpetuating stereotypes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what was the experiment conducted in LaPiere’s “Attitudes vs Actions”? what did it seek to prove? what were the findings?

A
  • guy travelled around America with a Chinese immigrant couple visiting hotels and restaurants to see if they would be refused service
  • wanted to make the point that self-reported attitudes may contradict behaviour
  • they were only refused service one time, despite the fact that when he called the establishments, 92% said they would refuse service to a Chinese person, indicating discrepancies between attitudes and behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

why is Allport’s “Nature of Prejudice” so influential today?

A

laid the foundations for many influential research topics in intergroup relations:
- influential in his social cognitive perspective of prejudice
- emphasized the importance of studying intergroup relations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

who was Gordon Allport?

A

father of research on intergroup relations; wrote “the Nature of Prejudice”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

according to Allport’s
“The Nature of Prejudice”, why do humans slip so easily into ethnic prejudice?

A

erroneous generalization + hostility, which are both common capacities of the human mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

describe Allport’s contact hypothesis in “The Nature of Prejudice”

A
  • a specific type of intergroup contact is an effective means of reducing intergroup hostility and prejudice
  • type of contact can take on many forms depending on the situational context
  • effective contact is based on acquaintanceship, integration, and communal identity/goal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

according to Allport’s contact hypothesis, what are the various situational factors that can impact the type of intergroup contact?

A
  1. quantity (frequency/duration of contact)
  2. status (are groups of equal/different status)
  3. goals (does interaction facilitate cooperative vs competitive behaviour)
  4. social (is contact formal or casual; voluntary or involuntary)
  5. physical (what is the context; what is the proximity of the groups)
17
Q

according to Allport, what criteria determines effective intergroup contact?

A
  1. based on acquaintanceship (contact that brings knowledge and acquaintance is ideal)
  2. integrated (close proximity)
  3. communal (revolving around a shared identity or goal)
18
Q

what was the basis for one of the first studies on intergroup contact, by Singer and Stouffer (1948)?

A

studied relationships between Black and White military officers

19
Q

what was the basis for one of the first studies on intergroup contact, by Deutsch and Collins (1951)?

A

compared the relationships between Black and White residents for those living in more vs less integrated public housing

20
Q

what theory emerged out of Sherif’s “Robbers Cave” experiment?

A

realistic conflict theory: argues that intergroup conflict is a reflection of social structural forces; specifically due to competition for desired resources

21
Q

according to Sherif’s “Robbers Cave” experiment, what determines intergroup attitudes/behaviour?

A

determined by the nature of functional relations between the groups, rather than by deviant behaviour from individual members

22
Q

what were the three stages of Sherif’s “Robbers Cave” experiment?

A
  1. experimental ingroup formation
  2. competition/friction between groups
  3. integration between groups
23
Q

what is social identity theory?

A
  • individuals’ sense of identity and self esteem is determined primarily by their group membership
  • Tajfel
24
Q

what is Tajfel’s minimal group paradigm?

A
  • the mere classification into ingroups and outgroups based on arbitrary characteristics is enough to create intergroup bias
  • people shape their identity around their group membership
25
Q

what is system justification theory, as outlined in Fanon’s “Black Skin White Masks”?

A
  • maintaining existing social structures is prioritized, even at the expense of personal or group interests
  • Black people have an incentive to continue to uphold inequality and internalize a sense of inferiority, since it helps them maintain a sense of order
26
Q

what is social cognition in the context of intergroup relations?

A
  • the study of how mental processes like perception, memory, and thought shape our understanding of the social world
  • argues that a better understanding of how the human mind works is vital to understanding the processes related to bias, discrimination, and prejudice
27
Q

what is implicit social cognition? how is it tested?

A
  • investigates the role of automatic/unconscious processes in social psychological outcomes such as bias, discrimination, and prejudice
  • tested through evaluative priming (i.e., pairing faces of different races with various words with positive vs negative connotations)
28
Q

according to Lippmann, when are stereotypes beneficial? when do they become harmful?

A
  • useful in helping us make sense of the world and assigning order to mass amounts of information we are exposed to
  • they become harmful when they are not altered and individualized with experience or counter-information, and are not explicitly understood to be semi-fictionalized generalizations
29
Q

according to Lippmann, what are the consequences of treating stereotypes as biological fact?

A

treating stereotypes as essentialist fact gives support for pseudoscientific and racist narratives like race psychology