HISTORICAL CRITICISM Flashcards

1
Q

Examines the origins of the earliest text to appreciate the underlying circumstances upon
which the text came to be.

A

HISTORICAL CRITICISM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 IMPORTANT GOALS IF HISTORICAL CRITICISM

A
  • To discover the original meaning of the text in its primitive or historical context and its literal sense or sensus literalis historicus.
  • To establish a reconstruction of the
    historical situation of the author and
    recipients of the text.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types Of Historical Criticism

A

External criticism:
Internal criticism:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Determines the authenticity ofthe source; to spot fabricated, forged, faked documents; and distinguish a hoax or misrepresentation

A

External Criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Authenticity check:

A
  • Date verification: Check for anachronisms, such as objects or events that don’t match the time period (e.g., pencils post-16th century).
  • Authorship: Identify the author through handwriting, signatures, or seals.
  • Anachronistic style: Look for outdated language or expressions (e.g., “burning the midnight oil,” “thou” instead of “you”), or unusual punctuation (e.g., “/” used as a comma or period).
  • Event references: Watch for historical events that are placed too early, too late, or too far in the past.
  • Provenance: Assess the document’s origin and history to confirm its authenticity.
  • Semantics: Interpret the meaning of words or texts.
  • Hermeneutics: Apply principles to interpret ambiguous or unclear words.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Credibility/Authenticity: Verifies the truthfulness of facts in the document.

A

Internal Criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tests of Credibility

A
  • Identification of the author (determine his reliability: mental processes,
    personal attitude).
  • Determination of the approximate date (handwriting, signature, seal)
  • Ability to tell the truth (nearness to the event, competence of eyewitness,
    degree of attention).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Studies and analyses the sources; ex. Bible.

A

Source Criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Identifies the original form and historical context of literary traditions (e.g., oracles, poetry, parables).

A

Form Criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Views the author as an editor who shaped and combined multiple sources into a final text.

A

Redaction Criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Traces the development of oral traditions from their historical origins to their written form.

A

Tradition Criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Interprets the Bible based on the text within the Biblical canon.

A

Canonical Criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Study of historical seals by specialists known as sigillographers.

A

Sigillography

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The study of deciphering and dating historical manuscripts

A

Paleography

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Examining how a document was created and its historical context.

A

Diplomatics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Compares the document to actual events using the best available sources.

A

Accuracy