HHRI Case Studies Flashcards
Military intervention in IRAQ
Iraq (2003-2011)
U.S.-led coalition (primarily U.S., UK (BLAIR), and other NATO allies).
Claim of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), regime change (ousting Saddam Hussein), and combating terrorism.
Controversy: Lack of WMDs found, questioned legitimacy of invasion, and regional instability. Critics argue it led to increased terrorism and sectarian violence. To this day Blair is critised.
Impact and Outcomes: Saddam Hussein was removed; Iraq descended into chaos, with insurgency, rise of ISIS, and major loss of life. U.S. influence in the region weakened. Eroded trust of western government.
Military intervention in Libya
Libya (2011)
NATO forces (primarily U.S., UK, France).
Reasons for Intervention: UN Security Council mandate to protect civilians from Gaddafi’s brutal forces during the civil war.
Controversy: Shifted from humanitarian protection to regime change; aftermath led to power vacuum, instability, and armed conflict among militias.
Impact and Outcomes: Gaddafi was overthrown and killed, but Libya plunged into ongoing civil war, with competing factions and instability persisting. Critiscism that NATO did not plan for the power vacuum post Gaddafi.
Military intervention in Russia / Ukraine.
Russia-Ukraine (2022-Present)
Russia (direct intervention), with NATO and Western allies supporting Ukraine.
Reasons for Intervention: Russia’s desire to maintain influence over Ukraine, prevent NATO expansion, and protect Russian-speaking populations.
Controversy: Russia’s invasion seen as violation of international law, while NATO’s involvement is viewed as escalation by Russia.
Impact and Outcomes: Devastating war with heavy casualties, international sanctions on Russia, and significant geopolitical realignment, with Ukraine seeking EU and NATO membership.
