Hermans 2007 Added Notes Flashcards
What does the paper argue requires a diologocal concept to account for global and local voices involved in continuous interchanges and negotiations within the self?
Proses of globalisation and localisation and how they impact on self and identity.
What motivates individuals to find local groups for identity construction?
Uncertainty
What 3 factors are crucial to understanding these processes of g and l on the individual?
Increasing no of voices and contour voices. 2) role of social power 3) the role of emotions.
What 3 levels do the authors prose we study self and identity?
Individual, local, global
Significant psychological factor in processes of g and l?
The experience of uncertainty
Does hermans agree that processes of globalisation are moving us towards homogeneity?
No, is poses opportunity a to sharpen cultural differences or create new oppositions. Researchers Meyer and geschiere 1999 globalisation can almost be defined by its cultural differences.
What is the relationship between g and l?
They imply each other
Shafer 2004 said that the Internet is used in a globaly it remains local at all points. Hermans 2007 interpreted this as
Global info is adapted to fit the local needs
Increasing interactions across cultural boundaries and emerging in group customs are exams of what?
The co existing diological relationship between the sociocultural trends of globalisation and localisation. P33
What two ways does Arnett (2002) argue adolescents adapt to both there local and global society?
Develop a bicultural identity rooted in both local and global society. Or a hybrid identity successfully mixing elements of global and local in a mix.
What risk is globalisation to Identity according to Arnett 2002 p34
Young people especially from traditional cultures may not feel at home on the global or local situation
What page justifies and explains the diological position for considering the impact of globalisation on self and identity?
35
How does localisation cope with the threat of multiple conflicting voices?
Reduces the voices as a defence.
How are social hirachies internalised in the self?
They reflect the dominance of certain voices within the internal dialogue between I positions.
Need for hierarchical organisation of positions?
Dominance of certain voices leads to less feelings of uncertainty which can provoke anxiety from our biological need for stability. Allowing diverse voices within the self can increase the diversity and range of contributions.