HC3-digital innovation (2) Flashcards
digital innovation happens at 4 levels:
- basic fuctions: information storage and retrieval, control
- Integrated processing of level 1 unctions: information processing, control loops
- Integration of level 2 processing into systems: integrated information and control systems
- Complex integrated systems and the ability to self-optimize and learn: platforms and integrated networks
power of digital:
- common language, so interoperability is possible
- Digital technologies allow for easy updates to the core programs because they require only software revision
3.Moore’s Law: the power of electronic devices increases exponentially whilst their cost falls
which enables a continuing stream of innovation delivering expanding functionality without high cost - Modularization of software and the development of programming languages means that increasingly complex arrangements become possible
techno-economic paradigm
Digital innovation has disruptive potential: the process towards radical impact is slow but when it
converges there can be significant waves of change flowing from it. The role of technology as a driver
of economic growth has to be matched by a complementary change in social structures and expectations.
Before mobile phones can be used, a whole network must be set up.
productivity paradox
extensive invetment in new technologies does not always seems to contribute to expected rises in productivity
rationalist strategy
Consists of the following steps:
- Describe, understand and analyse the environment
- Determine a course of action in light of the analysis
- Carry out the decided course of action
The equivalent of these steps is SWOT: the analysis of corporate strengths and weaknesses in relation to external opportunities and threats. The rationalist approach assumes that there is perfect knowledge of the organization and environment.
incementalist strategy
Consists of the following steps:
- Make deliberate steps (or changes) towards the stated objective
- Measure and evaluate the effects of the steps (changes)
- Adjust (if necessary) the objective and decide on the next step (change)
The incrementalist approach assumes that there is imperfect knowledge of the organization and
environment. Continuous scanning of the environment is therefore necessary to be able to adapt strategies in light of new information and understanding
innovation leadership
firms aim at being first to marker based on technological leaderhip.
innovation followership
firms aim at being late to market based on imitating from the experiences of technological leaders
7 advantages of being first to market
- reputation as a pioneer
- capture market share
- early learning curve benefits
- definition of standards
- Establish entry barriers (patents)
- dominate supply and distribution chains
- earn monopoly profits
7 disadvantages of being first to market
- pioneering costs
- Educating buyers
- regulatory approval
- demand uncertainty
- chaning buyer needs
- low-cost imitation
- followers leapfrog technology
the dynamic capabilities of firms
-shifting character of environment
-Key role of strategic maangement
appropriating the benefits from innovation (2)
- capacity to translate technological advantage into commercially viable products or processes.
- Firms capacity to defend their advantage against imitatiors
exploiting technological trajectories (5)
Differences among industrial sectors in the sources and directions of technological change:
1. Size of innovating firms
2. Basis of competition
3. Objectives of innovation
4. Sources of innovation
5. Locus of own innovation
This diversity creates two dangers:
1. Generalizing the nature, source, direction and strategic implications of innovation on the basis of experience in one firm or sector.
2. Stating that all firms and sectors are different and that no generalizations can be made
core competencies approach (Hamel and Prahalad)
- The sustainable competitive advantage of firms resides not only in products but in their core
competencies - Core competencies feed into more than one core product, which in turn feed into more than
one business unit - The importance of associated organizational competencies is recognized
- Core competencies require focus
- Core competencies suggest that large and multidivisional firms should be viewed not only as
a collection of SBUs but also as bundles of competencies that do not necessarily fit tidily in
one business unit
core competencies should be:
- Value for the firm
- Rare
- Non-imitable
- Non-substitutable
3 limitations core competencies approach
- Not clear whether core competencies offer a basis for product diversification in every industry
- Recommendations that firms should concentrate resources on a few fundamental technological competencies are misleading
- Core competencies can also become core rigidities if established competencies have become too dominant