Hanncock language - 2011 Flashcards

1
Q

How much of the general population are psychopaths?

A

1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a psychopath?

A

individuals who exhibit abnormally high levels of selfishness and seemingly lack a conscience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is an outline of the inspiration for study?

A

Computerised analysis of language produced by psychiatric patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was found from the background study?

A

Fewer words pertaining to:
- optimism
- basic cognitive function
- references to the future
- communication with others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who were the two researchers who had previous work into the language of psychopaths?

A

1) Cleckley (1976)
2) Williamson (1993)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who is Cleckley (1976) ?

A

A researcher who observed, through CASE STUDIES, that the discourse of psychopaths was more likely to include tangential and incoherent quality than non-psychopaths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who is Williamson (1993) ?

A

A researcher who analysed the narratives of psychopaths and non-psychopaths and found that the former used more contractionary and logically inconsistent statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was used to analyse language?

A

Statistical test analysis tools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is measured through these tools?

A
  • instrumental nature
  • unique material and socioemotional needs
  • emotional deficit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the aim of the study?

A

To examine if language of psychopaths reflected (as predicted) a predatory world view, unique socioemotional needs, and poverty of affect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the false aim of the study?

A

how well convicts can remember their crimes (memory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What research method was used?

A

Self-report - interview

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What type of interview was used?

A

semi-structured / open ended

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a strength of using a semi-structured interview?

A

Allows participants to expand on answers due to follow up questions - making finding the reasons for behaviour easier yet there is also a form of structure allowing answers to be gathered effectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What’s a weakness of using a semi-structured interview?

A
  • lacks validity as it is harder to compare responses
  • less controlled
  • high risk of bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What interview technique was used?

A

Step-Wise Interview technique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does the Step-Wise interview allow?

A

experimenters to gather as much detail as possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is a weakness of using a self-report method?

A

Social desirability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What type of data was collected?

A

Qualitative and Quantitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is an example of the data that was collected?

A

language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is a weakness of the amount of qualitative data that was collected?

A
  • the audio-taped narratives were too detailed and varied to allow direct comparison
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How was quantitative data gathered?

A

transcription and analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How was psychopathy measured?

A

Personality Checklist revised (PCL-R)

24
Q

Who created the PCL-R?

A

Robert HARE

25
What happened after the interviews?
Narratives were TRANSCRIBED as close to verbatim through content analysis using the W-matrix and DAL
26
What was the sample?
52 males from Canadian correctional facility
27
What were the conviction rates?
16% (8) = first degree murder 64% (32) = second degree murder 20% (10) = manslaughter
28
What was the psychopath to non-psychopath ratio?
14:38
29
What was the mean age and the range of the age of convicts?
Mean age was 20.8 Range was 14-50
30
What are the 5 evaluation points of the sample?
- culture bias (ethnocentric) - gender bias (androcentric) - only a specific type of person (volunteer) - social desirability (self-report) - small sample (not rep. = not gen.)
31
How were participants acquired?
Volunteered
32
What are strengths of a self-selected sample?
- less chance of attrition (dropping out)
33
What are the weaknesses of a self-selected sample?
- only attracts a certain type of person - therefore less representative - cannot be generalised
34
What did the two groups not differ on (Psychopaths vs. Non-Psychopaths)?
- age - amount of time since homicide was committed
35
What was the first step of the procedure?
Potential participants were asked if they would be interested in taking part in a research study
36
What was the first stage for those who were interested?
Were asked to complete the PCL-R
37
What is the PCL-R?
Psychopathy Checklist- Revised
38
What's a strength of the PCL-R?
- universal = more valid and reliable
39
What is involved in the PCL-R?
- 20 criteria (rated from 0-2) - maximum score of 40 - 25+ = Psychopath
40
Who conducted the PCL-R?
extensively trained prison psychologists who were trained in the coding of the PCL-R
41
How long were the interviews?
25 minutes
42
How is the procedure unethical?
Participants were deceived on the aim of the study - they were told it was about memory and how well inmates can recall their homicides
43
What is a strength of the interview?
Verbally explained so that participants can ask questions and understand what they have to do properly
44
How was the interview recorded?
Audio-taped
45
What were participants asked to do in the interview?
Describe their homicide in as much detail as possible
46
Who were participants interviewed by?
two senior psychology graduate students and one research assistant
47
What is important to note about the interviewers?
they were blind to the psychopathy scores
48
What is the Wmatrix?
a text analysis tool which compares part of speech to analyse semantic concepts
49
What is the DAL?
analyses tone of words
50
What are some results found by the Wmatrix?
psychopaths used approx. twice as many words in relation to basic physiological needs such as eating compared to the controls who focused on social needs such as family
51
What are some results from the DAL?
psychopaths physiologically distanced themselves from their homicide
52
What are the results regarding word use?
- psychopaths used roughly 2,200 words and non-psychopaths used roughly 2,500 words - psychopaths used more past tense verbs such as 'stabbed'
53
What are some conclusions of the study?
- Psychopaths are more likely than non-psychopaths to describe a cause and effect relationship when describing their murders - Psychopaths linguistically frame their homicide as more in the past through using psychologically distant terms
54
What are some conclusions about psychopaths and language use?
1- tend to view their crimes as the logical outcome of a plan 2- more likely to focus on their own physiological needs 3- less emotional and positive in their speech 4- emotionally detached from their crimes
55
What are the ethical issues considered in this study?
- full confidentiality was maintained - full informed consent (volunteer) - debriefed verbally at the end of the interview