Groups and Team Flashcards
Informal group
- Three or more people with a common relationship
Formal team
- Three or more people who work closely together towards a common objective
- Necessary characteristics:
- Shared leadership
- Shared purpose or mission
- Team members are accountable to one another.
- Continuous
- Effectiveness measured at collective level.
Team development (The 5 stage model)
- Forming
- Storming
- Norming
- Performing
- Adjourning
Forming
- Period of testing and learning
- Evaluate benefits and costs of membership
- Feelings of discomfort
- Establishing trust, relationships, purpose, goals and expectations
Storming
Members start to communicate their feelings but still view themselves as individuals rather than part of the team. They resist control by group leaders and show hostility as they compete for roles.
* Questioning team direction, leadership roles, opinions/decisions, objectives
* Fosters decision making and conflict resolution process.
Norming
People feel part of the team and realize that they can achieve work if they accept other viewpoints
* Convergence on team mental model
* Becomes a cohesive unit
* Norms, rules, and expectations clarified.
Performing
The team works in an open and trusting atmosphere where flexibility is the key and hierchy is of little importance.
* Mutual accountability
* Coordination
* Quality
* Trust
Adjourning
The team conducts an assessment of the project and implements a plan for transitioning roles and recognizing members’ contributions.
Individual issues
- How do I fit in?
- What’s my role here?
- What do the others expect of me?
- How do I best perform?
- What’s next?
Group Issues
- Why are we here?
- Who’s in charge and who does what?
- Can we agree on roles and work as a team?
- Can we do the job properly?
- How do we disband?
Issues with the 5-stage model
- Teams don’t always proceed clearly from one stage to the next
- Teams can also move backwards.
- Ignores organizational context (swift trust)
Punctuated Equilibrium Model: Phase 1- group meets
The first meeting sets the group’s direction Direction tends to be written in stone. The first phase of group activity is one of inertia nobody really does what they are supposed to
Punctuated Equilibrium Model: Phase 1.
Initial Impact on team
You will decide early on a topic- and stick with it
Put some thought into it!
You will divide the tasks
But nobody will deliver
Many non-productive meetings
Punctuated Equilibrium Model : Phase 1.
Transition
Initiates major change
Happens approximately mid-way through a project
Will be a burst of activity, followed by inertia
Impact on the team:
About now you will start to panic about your project
You may change your topic
You’ll have lots of questions for the professor
Issues will be resolved
Punctuated Equilibrium Model: Phase 2
Another (smaller) round of inertia
Plans made during the transition will be carried out
Final meetings will be very productive
Impact on the team:
A new plan (goals, timelines, distribution of work, etc.) will be implemented
Things will get done
One final push right before the deadline
Punctuated Equilibrium Model: Phase 2
Team identity development
When employees shift their view of the team from them to us. Making the team a part of their social identity and shaping the team to better fit their prototype of an ideal team.
Punctuated Equilibrium Model: Phase 2
Team effectiveness (performance):
The capacity a team has to accomplish the goals or objectives administered by an organization
An effective team is one in which the team produces more than the sum of its parts (collective contributions are more than the sum of individual member contributions)
Aiming for process gain> process loss