Group cohesion Flashcards
What has group cohesion been an important factor for?
in the study of group behavior and its significance is often a source of motivation for group leaders.
What clichés could describe group cohesion?
“together we stand, divided we fall”, “there is no I in team”, “players play, teams win”.
what are this clichés used for?
show individuals the importance of group cohesion.
what is cohesion?
It is a multi-level process with multiple components/ influences
outline group cohesion:
- cohesion comes in many shapes and sizes and is constantly changing.
- cohesion is not a simple process, but a multidimensional process with many influences.
what is the concept of equifinality?
the final state of cohesion can be reached through different paths.
what are the two forms of cohesion?
task and social.
what is task cohesion?
- is the commitment among its group members to achieve a goal and the capacity to perform successfully as a unit.
- it is a group and individual level concept.
what is social cohesion?
it is the attraction of members to one another and the group as a whole
what does cohesion signal?
it signals the health of the group by identifying if there is closeness or divide = satisfaction.
is the group that has the most skills always the most successful?
No the more cohesive the group the more successful.
what was Festinger’s, Schacter and Back’s definition of cohesion? (1950)
the total field of forces that act on members to remain in the group.
what was the significance of the 1950 definition of Festinger, Schacter and Back?
it was the first widely accepted definition of cohesion.
What was Back’s definition in 1951?
the attraction which a group has for its members.
What was Libo’s definition 1953?
the resultant forces acting on each member to remain in the group.
What notion did early cohesion definition’s reflect?
the unity of the individuals within a group was solely dependent on the individuals attraction of the group or team morale.
Why cant cohesion be researched through a one dimensional analysis?
Because of its dynamic nature, specifically in the case of attraction-to-group analysis or team morale as it can change over time.
what does the attraction-to-group theory not take into account?
- does not take into account individuals being dissatisfied with the team or hostility (unfriendliness) between group members within the group.
- also team adversity (being a man down and still winning).
or team goal setting.
what did Mudrack state about cohesion in 1989?
that cohesion is intuitively easy to understand and describe but the description has failed to translate in ease of a definition.
What was Carron, Brawley and Widmeyer’s definition in 1998?
a dynamic process that is reflected in the tendency of a group to stick together and remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives and/or/for the satisfaction of member needs.
what are the common elements of group cohesion?
- cohesion= attraction.
- similarity principle.
- social and personal attraction
What did Lewis/Festinger say about cohesion= attraction?
Lewis/Festinger and colleagues considered cohesion to be a form of individual attraction–> positive attitudes toward members in group, vs. out group.
What is the similarity principle?
members of cohesive groups tend to like their fellow members. (similar to homophily)
what is homophily?
Being tied or attracted to those similar to yourself.
What did Hogg propose social and personal attraction to be?
social; a depersonalized liking for individuals in the group. not personally attracted to a specific individual you are attracted to the group not specifically the people.
personal; liking for specific individuals
what leads to attraction and cohesion?
attraction between members and attraction to the group as a whole.
How does cohesion represent unity?
cohesive groups tend to stick together as members cohere to one another and the group (aka entitativity–> looks to the group of individuals as one whole instead of a bunch of separate counterparts.)
what is collective cohesion?
when the group is unified there is more solidarity or agreement.
greater purpose of the group.
do cohesive groups have high emotional cohesion?
yes, they have more emotional interaction and emotional intensity between and with the group as a whole.
better emotional connections and bonds.
how does group unity make members feel?
it gives a sense of belonging to the members and allows them to identify themselves as group members.
what do many theorists believe about cohesion?
it is more then interpersonal relationships.
what is shared commitment with respect to cohesion = task and teamwork?
the combined activities of two or more individuals who coordinate their efforts to achieve a goal.