General VF Screening Techniques Flashcards
non automated instruments and techniques
- confrontation fields (count to full fingers, field limits confrontations, color confrontations- red cap, face confrontations)
- tangent screen
sensitivity of confrontations to all types of VF loss:
50-60%
sensitivity of confrontations to ON-related VF loss:
20-30%
what type of VF loss has a high sensitivity with face confrontations?
central scotomas
sensitivity of confrontations to chaismal VF loss
40-50%
sensitivity of confrontations to post-chiasmal VF loss
> 75%
non-automated strategy that is rapid, informal, very gross, often used, and can check for extinction phenomenon
count fingers confrontations
extinction phenomenon can occur in some cases of ____ damage
parietal cortex damage
extinction phenomenon presents as what type of loss
homonymous hemianopsia contralateral to the lesion
what conditions on count fingers confrontations must be present to see the extinction phenomenon?
only if fingers are presented on both sides of the vertical midline simultaneously
non-automated strategy that only tests the absolute limits of the VF, has much variability/fluctuation in peripheral VF, has very limited usefulness
field-limits confrontations
why are field-limits confrontations much less useful than count fingers
few VF defects affect peripheral VF limits only
what can the red cap test (color confrontations) be useful in detecting?
very helpful in detecting mild central or centrocecal scotomas due to optic nerve disease
what can the red cap test (color confrontations) in quadrant comparison specifically be useful in detecting?
VF loss from chiasmal compression
- pituitary adenoma
- craniopharyngloma
pituitary adenoma would result in what defect on the red cap-quadrant comparison test?
superior temporal quadrants ou red cap is less red than superior nasal