General romantics criticism Flashcards

1
Q

Why, simply by being poets, were Romantics fated to be reactionaries?

A

Because the enlightened, bourgeois, liberal “doctrine of progress” undermined the “poetic values of love and pleasure”, tradition, etc. to which they were dedicated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who wrote ‘Poetry in an Age of Revolution’?

A

P.M.S. Dawson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Hazlitt set against ‘imagination’?

A

‘Understanding’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was Hazlitt’s binary of the mind’s faculties?

A
  • The imagination, “a monopolising faculty, which seeks the greatest quantity of present excitement by inequality and disproportion,” versus the understanding, “a distributive faculty, which seeks the greatest quantity of ultimate good, by justice and proportion.”
  • Imagination as opposite to understanding or reason is commonplace in Romantic thought
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Dawson’s opinion of the most sympathetic view of the Romantics?

A

They had a position of responsibility without power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the Romantics’ chief error, according to Dawson?

A
  • To depend on the imagination as a transformative power.
  • To call on their readers to imagine the world in a new way in order to transform it into that newness.
  • When really the social world needed to be materially transformed first in order for imaginative vision to be readily available to most people.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was a positive side of the Romantics’ error?

A

It allowed them to at least record their protest against inhuman conditions and it preserved them from despair.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is another way to consider the “escapism” of which Romantics are often accused?

A

As consolation or compensation for being unable to transform the world; instead they lodge themselves and their readers in imaginary, ideal worlds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain the danger about vision.

A
  • There was a danger that the poets’ resort to vision would in turn help to cut the visionary off from the ordinary person, the human community.
  • Unable to change the world, the privileged hid in comforting, invented worlds while leaving the rest to suffer.
  • Present in the works, Excursion, Kubla Khan, Ancient Mariner, Alastor, Triumph of Life, Childe Harolde, Manfred, Cain, La Belle Dame Sans Merci, Fall of Hyperion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why was this danger of excluding others always present?

A

Because the alternative to visionary escape was acquiescence in the conditions of the world as it was and a lapse into custom and habit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What might allow us to consider a poet as essentially progressive rather than essentially reactionary?

A
  • Because in a society whose practices and beliefs constituted a denial of human imagination and creativity - the enlightenment society - it was the poets’ role to keep open a sense of alternative possibility.
  • This perhaps is the crucial political function of the imagination, and in this respect all true poets are, as Shelley argued at the end of ‘A Defence of Poetry’, politically progressive, whatever their ostensible political beliefs.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who wrote ‘Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination’?

A

Jonathan Bate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Nachkömmling mean?

A

Either ‘aftercomer’, ‘latecomer’, or in its different sense, ‘descendant’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the main points of Goethe’s remark to Johann Peter Eckermann?

A

That having studied Shakespeare “a dramatic talent of any importance … must be aware that Shakespeare has already exhausted the whole of human nature in all its tendencies” and that “there remains for him, the aftercomer, nothing more to do”.
And how much courage it must take to then put pen to paper knowing such “unattainable excellencies were already in existence!”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Harold Bloom say about Goethe’s remark?

A
  • He alighted on the ‘anxiety’ of the thought ‘What is there left to do?’ in his Oedipal theory of poetry as a history of encounters between the poet and their father, ‘strong poets’ and their even stronger precursors.
  • For Freudian Bloom, “belatedness is a problem; the precursor has to be confronted aggressively, he cannot be acknowledged and accepted.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does Bloom’s theory leave out?

A
  • That nachkömmling also means descendant.
  • The hope that one might eb the descendant of a great poet rather than just one who came after, might bring confidence rather than anxiety.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How did Keats imagine Shakespeare?

A
  • As a ‘presider’, watching over his poetic endeavour.

- Also that ‘the count / Of Mighty poets is made up’, that ‘the sun of poesy is set’ (Endymion).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Talk about worthiness and Shakespeare

A

There was a shared dread of being unworthy of Shakespeare juxtaposed with the hope of one day being worthy of him, and gain an immortality like his.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is Bate’s opinion of the single concept at the heart of English Romanticism?

A

The ascription of a central place to the power of the creative imagination, and a belief that imagination, genius, and poetry are closely associated with each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How did 18th century critics and aestheticians pave the way for the Romantics?

A

By exploring the creative power of the imagination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Why might we consider the rise of Romanticism and the idolatry of Shakespeare parallel phenomena?

A

Because in their explorations of the creative power of the imagination, 18th century critics looked again and again to Shakespeare.

22
Q

How was Shakespeare perceived by many 18th century critics?

A

As a ‘natural genius’; the great poet of imagination.

- There was no distinction made between imagination and fancy.

23
Q

What did Dryden say on Shakespeare?

A
  • “Those who accuse him to have wanted learning give him the greater commendation: he was naturally learned; he needed not the spectacles of books to read nature; he looked inwards, and found her there”
  • “You more than see it, you feel it too”
24
Q

How did English neo-classical criticism follow Dryden?

A
  • In his distinction between art and learning on the one hand, nature and genius on the other.
  • In the idea that Shakespeare expresses passions where other writers just describe them, and the audience/reader fellow-feeling and sympathetic identification with action and emotions of play. (You feel it too)
25
Q

How did Shakespeare shift from exception to exemplum?

A
  • With the movement from mimetic to expressive modes of art, from ‘mirror’ to ‘lamp’.
  • He was “An eye to us all; a blessed heaven-sent bringer of light” (Thomas Carlyle).
  • Shakespeare went from being admired for truthfully mirroring created nature, to being admired for grasping the living principle at the heart of nature.
26
Q

How did German idealism permeate English Romanticism?

A
  • In the idea that reality was located in the interplay of mind and world through imagination rather than in a fixed exterior ‘general nature’.
  • This meant romantic poets dwelt on the perceiving self and creative imagination.
  • Shakespeare was what Germans used to avoid French cultural hegemony and initiate Romantic revolution.
27
Q

What does Schlegel say on the supernatural and magic, in Shakespeare especially?

A

That it is intimately associated with “the inward life of nature and her mysterious springs, which, it is true, can never be altogether unknown to the genuine poet, as poetry is altogether incompatible with mechanic physics”

28
Q

Who wrote ‘Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination’?

A

Jonathan Bate

29
Q

What does Nachkömmling mean?

A

Either ‘aftercomer’, ‘latecomer’, or in its different sense, ‘descendant’

30
Q

What were the main points of Goethe’s remark to Johann Peter Eckermann?

A

That having studied Shakespeare “a dramatic talent of any importance … must be aware that Shakespeare has already exhausted the whole of human nature in all its tendencies” and that “there remains for him, the aftercomer, nothing more to do”.
And how much courage it must take to then put pen to paper knowing such “unattainable excellencies were already in existence!”

31
Q

What did Harold Bloom say about Goethe’s remark?

A
  • He alighted on the ‘anxiety’ of the thought ‘What is there left to do?’ in his Oedipal theory of poetry as a history of encounters between the poet and their father, ‘strong poets’ and their even stronger precursors.
  • For Freudian Bloom, “belatedness is a problem; the precursor has to be confronted aggressively, he cannot be acknowledged and accepted.”
32
Q

What does Bloom’s theory leave out?

A
  • That nachkömmling also means descendant.
  • The hope that one might eb the descendant of a great poet rather than just one who came after, might bring confidence rather than anxiety.
33
Q

How did Keats imagine Shakespeare?

A
  • As a ‘presider’, watching over his poetic endeavour.

- Also that ‘the count / Of Mighty poets is made up’, that ‘the sun of poesy is set’ (Endymion).

34
Q

Talk about worthiness and Shakespeare

A

There was a shared dread of being unworthy of Shakespeare juxtaposed with the hope of one day being worthy of him, and gain an immortality like his.

35
Q

What is Bate’s opinion of the single concept at the heart of English Romanticism?

A

The ascription of a central place to the power of the creative imagination, and a belief that imagination, genius, and poetry are closely associated with each other.

36
Q

How did 18th century critics and aestheticians pave the way for the Romantics?

A

By exploring the creative power of the imagination.

37
Q

Why might we consider the rise of Romanticism and the idolatry of Shakespeare parallel phenomena?

A

Because in their explorations of the creative power of the imagination, 18th century critics looked again and again to Shakespeare.

38
Q

How was Shakespeare perceived by many 18th century critics?

A

As a ‘natural genius’; the great poet of imagination.

- There was no distinction made between imagination and fancy.

39
Q

What did Dryden say on Shakespeare?

A
  • “Those who accuse him to have wanted learning give him the greater commendation: he was naturally learned; he needed not the spectacles of books to read nature; he looked inwards, and found her there”
  • “You more than see it, you feel it too”
40
Q

How did English neo-classical criticism follow Dryden?

A
  • In his distinction between art and learning on the one hand, nature and genius on the other.
  • In the idea that Shakespeare expresses passions where other writers just describe them, and the audience/reader fellow-feeling and sympathetic identification with action and emotions of play. (You feel it too)
41
Q

How did Shakespeare shift from exception to exemplum?

A
  • With the movement from mimetic to expressive modes of art, from ‘mirror’ to ‘lamp’.
  • He was “An eye to us all; a blessed heaven-sent bringer of light” (Thomas Carlyle).
  • Shakespeare went from being admired for truthfully mirroring created nature, to being admired for grasping the living principle at the heart of nature.
42
Q

How did German idealism permeate English Romanticism?

A
  • In the idea that reality was located in the interplay of mind and world through imagination rather than in a fixed exterior ‘general nature’.
  • This meant romantic poets dwelt on the perceiving self and creative imagination.
  • Shakespeare was what Germans used to avoid French cultural hegemony and initiate Romantic revolution.
43
Q

What does Schlegel say on the supernatural and magic, in Shakespeare especially?

A

That it is intimately associated with “the inward life of nature and her mysterious springs, which, it is true, can never be altogether unknown to the genuine poet, as poetry is altogether incompatible with mechanic physics”

44
Q

How does 18th century criticism follow Schlegel in respect to the imagination and the supernatural?

A
  • Many saw the supernatural plays as Shakespeare’s great achievement and recognised their close connection with the imagination.
  • But the imagination was also seen as suspect, “impatient of restraint.
  • For Schlegel and Coleridge, the ‘faery way of writing’ (Dryden), led not to the fringes of experience, away from general nature, but to the imaginative principle at the heart of nature, without which nature could not be organised or perceived.
  • The supernatural thus leads into the natural.
45
Q

How was the imagination perceived as suspect?

A
  • Johnson: “a licentious and vagrant faculty, unsusceptible of limitations, and impatient of restraint” (Rambler)
  • Rowe: “the greatness of the Author’s genius does nowhere so much appear as where he gives his Imagination an entire Loose, and raises his Fancy to a flight above Mankind and the Limits of the visible World. Such are his Attempts in The Tempest, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Macbeth and Hamlet.
46
Q

What was considered a chief characteristic of original genius?

A

The capacity to go outside the self.
“The genius, forgetting that he is a poet, wraps himself up in the person he designs; he becomes him” (William Guthrie, Essay upon English Tragedy - romantic within neo-classical).

47
Q

Why was Shakespeare called a Proteus?

A
  • He could write in whatever genre the public demanded.
    “this Proteus, who could put on any shape that either served his interest or suited his inclination” (Edward Capell, 1768)
  • He could write any character.
    “The Proteus of the drama … he … enters easily into every condition of human nature” (William Richardson).
    “Rather is he, such is the diversity of tone and colour, which varies according to the quality of his subjects he assumes, a very Proteus” (Schlegel, 1809-1811)
    “Seeing every object from the exact point of view in which others would see it. He was the Proteus of the human intellect” (Hazlitt)
48
Q

How does Hazlitt differ from 18th century predecessors in his treatment of Shakespeare as a Proteus?

A

He writes that Shakespeare has “a perfect sympathy with all things” yet was “alike indifferent to all”.
- That he was indifferent as well as sympathetic; he enters into his characters but also stands apart from them.

49
Q

How did Hazlitt’s opinion of Shakespeare influence Keats?

A

He came to believe that men of genius “have not any individuality, any determined character”

50
Q

How does Coleridge talk about Shakespeare as Proteus?

A

“It is easy to clothe Imaginary Beings with our own Thoughts and Feelings; but to send ourselves out of ourselves, to think ourselves in to the Thoughts and Feelings of Beings in circumstances wholly and strangely different from our own … Perhaps only Shakespeare [has achieved it]”

  • In imitation vs copy, creative vs slavish. (p15).