General Defences - Automatism P1 Flashcards

1
Q

What is the legal definition of automatism

A

Something done by Ds muscles without the control of his mind, an involuntary reflex movement where D is not conscious of what he is doing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the defence of automatism require

A

The total destruction of voluntary control on Ds part - impaird or reduced is not enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which case stated the requirement being total destruction of voluntary control

A

A-Gs Reference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which case showed the AR must be voluntary for a crime to be liable (example being a swam of bees)

A

Hill V Baxter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What kind of external facts are included within automatism

A

Traumatic event including severe shock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which case showed PSTD can operate to remove Ds MR (but didnt in this case)

A

T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the second stage of automatism

A

Self-induced automatism - If there is evidence that the lack of control wass because of Ds own fault = no defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case showed D self induced himself to amount to a ‘reflex’ reaction to protect himself from snakes

A

Lipman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case involved D self inducing himself by not eating and he knew he should have - he had control over it but failed

A

Bailey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does defence of automatism differ for specific intent crimes compared to basic intent

A

Specific intent crime - defence of automatism must have prevented him from forming the relevant MR
Basic intent - no defence of automatism if he was reckless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is insane automatism

A

Insanity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is non-insane automatism

A

Automatism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which case involved a hypo nurse in a mental hospital = automatism

A

Quick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which case involved a hypo driver swerving and driving recklessly but was still guilty as he had some degree of control

A

Broome v Perkins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which case shows the correct defence for insane automatism is insanity and not automatism

A

Hennessy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the final thing that the court must consider when a defence of automatism is brought

A

Must consider whether the defence of insanity ought to be raised to the jury

17
Q

Which case defines automatism but in the case was actually allowed the defence of insanity instead

A

Bratty v A-G of NI