General Chemistry Flashcards
What is a zero-order reaction? If I add twice the amount of reactants, what will happen to the rate of the reaction?
zero order reaction is a reaction where the [rxnt] doesn’t affect the rate of reaction.
adding twice the amount doesn’t matter because shits not gonna change
What is a first order reaction? If I add twice the amount of reactants, what will happen to the rate of the reaction? What situation should I be wary of?
the rate of the reaction only depends on ONE rxnt
If I add twice the amount of ONE reactant, it will increase the rate of reaction by TWO times (linear)
CAVEAT: Even if there are two reactants, don’t automatically think it’s 2nd order. If the question says shit changes for one linearly but doesn’t for the other reaction, that is a first order reaction!!
What is a second order reaction? If I add twice the amount of reactants, what will happen to the rate of the reaction? What is a situation that I should be wary of?
the rate of the reaction only depends on TWO rxnts
If A and B are my reactants, it can go two ways (exponential):
[A]^2 OR [B]^2 → QUADRUPLE rate of rxn
2[A][B] → QUADRUPLE rate of rxn
CAVEAT: Even if there are two reactants that individually are first order reactions, generally do NOT use NET RXN to determine rxn order. The fact that those two reactants DID affect the rate MEANS that the reaction as a WHOLE is 2nd order. REMEMBER THE DEFINITIONS!!
What are the two situations in reactions that indicate INCREASED entropy?
- If the moles (coeff) in pdt > moles in rxnt (ie. decomposition)
- change in phases in increasing disorder from rxnt → pdt (ie. s → g, s→ l, l → g, s → g)
List 2 steps in which you can calculate the approximate change in enthalpy if given a table with delta H formation data. (Hint: What law does delta H formation remind you of? What is a caveat you have to remember?)
- write the balanced rxn if not provided
- HESS’S LAW = sum(delta Hf pdts) - sum(delta Hf rxnts)
CAVEAT: ELEMENTS in their standard states have Hf = 0!!
0th law of thermodynamics
2 bodies in thermal equilibrium have the same temp
2nd law of thermodynamics
↑ entropy in a spontaneous process
3rd law of thermodynamics (Hint: related with the 2nd)
ENTROPY of PURE crystalline compounds at 0 K is ZERO!
How do you know if your compound is solid (ie. a precipitate)
If they contain minerals (transition metals) like Fe, Cu, Ag, Al, etc. that act as metal cations and anions which are usually polyatomic (ie. SO42-, PO43-, OH-, Cl-, etc.)
ie. Ag2SO4 is solid!!
What is the equation of the rate law of an rxn? What does each of the components mean?
rate law = k[rxnt(s) of the SLOWEST (rate-limiting) step]^coeff
k = equilibrium constant rxnt(s) = MAKE SURE all reactants you include here are ONLY in the slow step and not in OTHER steps (if multiple rxns are given) coeff = # moles of the rxnt in slow step → can determine the ORDER of rxn (0th = k, 1st = k[A], 2nd = k[A]^2)
In a graph that shows the reaction coordinate (time elapsed essentially) vs the free energy, how are intermediates signified?
they are the local minima between 2 transition states!
If a question asks whether a reaction coordinate vs free energy graph is indicating enzymatic activity, how do you confirm that it is?
you NEED to have another reference curve (non-enzyme vs enzyme)
→ if you only see ONE curve, you CANNOT make the assumption that enzymatic activity is present!
If they said solid platinum is the catalyst, would the statement “solid platinum increases the rate of the reaction better than its powder form” support the fact that solid platinum is the catalyst? Why or why not?
NO b/c powder form is better (↑ SA = ↑ rxn rate). Hence, the argument is INCONSISTENT with solid platinum being a catalyst
FOR THESE QUESTIONS: just objectively cross out anything that is OBJECTIVELY FALSE!
How do you calculate Q? What if Q is less than, greater than, or equal to Keq?
Q = [mole of pdts] / [mole of rxnts]
Q < Keq = forward
Q > Keq = reverse
Q = Keq = equilibrium
What is the temperature where particles can’t move in K? C°?
0 K
-273 °C
In terms of P and T, what are the conditions where particles are behaving LEAST like the ideal gases?
HIGH pressure
LOW temperature
combined gas law
PV/T = constant
combo of Boyles, Charles, and Guy-Lussac’s law
Henry’s Law
↑ partial pressure of gas = ↑ gas dissolved in liquid
amount of gas dissolved in liquid is PROPORTIONAL to the partial pressure of the gas ABOVE the liquid
Dalton’s law of partial pressure
partial pressure of gas in container = mole fraction of gas x Ptot
What are the P, T, and V for 1 mol in STP conditions (gas)? Is STP the same thing as standard conditions? If not, what is the temp in standard conditions?
P = 1 atm
T = 0 °C (273 K)
1 mol of gas = 22.4 L
STP is NOT the same thing as standard conditions. In standard conditions, the temp is 25 °C (298 K)
According to the ideal gas law (PV = nRT), what is the approximate volume of 16 g helium in STP conditions?
STP conditions → 1 mol gas = 22.4 L
16g He / (4 g He) = 4 mol He
4 mol He x 22.4 L ~ 88 L!!
CAVEAT: the PV=nRT equation wasn’t even NEEDED to solve this problem. the reason why they added this is because the ideal gas law happens in STP conditions. Hence, this equation is a DISTRACTOR!! BE AWARE OF THIS!!
isomerase
catalyze conversion of one CONFIGURATIONAL isomer to another (cis ↔ trans)
What are constitutional (structural) isomers based on their molecular formula (atoms), connectivity, etc.?
same molecular formula
DIFFERENT connectivity
What are conformational isomers based on their molecular formula (atoms), connectivity, etc.? Is it a stereoisomer?
same molecular formula
same connectivity
DIFFER in rotation about a single bond
Yes
What are configurational isomers based on their molecular formula (atoms), connectivity, etc.? Is it a stereoisomer?
same molecular formula
same connectivity
DIFFER in chirality or w/ respect to a double bond (CIS VS TRANS SHIT!)
Yes
What are enantiomers based on the number of chiral centers and stereochemistry? Is it a geometric or optical isomer? Is it a subset of configurational or conformational isomer?
has 1 or more chiral centers
ALL chiral centers must be stereoisomers of each other (mirror image)
optical
configurational
What are diastereomers based on the number of chiral centers and stereochemistry? Is it a geometric or optical isomer? Is it a subset of configurational or conformational isomer?
has 2 or more chiral centers
differ in stereochemistry in AT LEAST one chiral center, but NOT ALL chiral centers!
optical
configurational