Gender differences in achievement Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Explain 3 caveats about the gender gap in achievement.

A

1) The gender gap arises mainly because of differences between boys and girls in language and literacy skills, reflected in differences in performance in English and other subjects which are literacy based. The gender gap is small or negligible for Maths and Science. These trends are apparent both from historical data from English exam records going back 60 years and from international data.
2) While gender does independently predict attainment, the social class gap has greater explanatory power and for some groups, ethnicity is also a more important factor than gender.
3) A focus on boys’ underachievement can shift attention away from the fact that large numbers of girls are also low attainers. Tackling the scale of these numbers is arguably of greater priority and importance to policy makers than the proportionate difference between boys’ and girls’ attainment. Additionally, the different subject choices made by boys and girls may be more marked and have greater longer-term outcomes in terms of subsequent career choices than attainment differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

List some external factors that impact gender differences in achievement.

A

Gender role socialisation
Gendered activities and literacy
Social change and its effect on girls
The decline of traditional men’s jobs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is gender role socialisation?

A

Gender role socialisation is the process through which children learn about the social expectations, attitudes and behaviours typically associated with boys and girls.

It has been suggested that gender-differentiated primary socialisation gives girls an initial advantage in both primary and secondary school- but still tends to create a patriarchal society (e.g. the willingness of boys to break rules can lead to their dominating classrooms).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain the impact of gender role socialisation on differences at pre-school.

A

A longitudinal study indicated there were significant gender differences in young children’s intellectual and social behavioural development at entry to pre-school.

Girls generally showed better social development than boys, especially in cooperation/conformity and independence and concentration. Girls also showed higher attainment on all cognitive outcomes. Girls made greater gains in pre-reading, early number concepts and non-verbal reasoning than boys over the pre-school period.

The researchers also found that the pre-school home learning environments differed for boys and girls. Significantly more girls’ parents reported activities such as reading, teaching songs and nursery rhymes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain gender role socialisation according to Oakley.

A

Oakley postulated four ways in which gender socialisation occurs during primary socialisation.

Manipulation - The encouragement of behaviour that is seen as ‘normal’ for a child and discouragement of behaviour seen as abnormal or normal for the other sex.

Different Activities - Promoting different activities between boys and girls.

Verbal Appellations - Using different words and phrases with different sexes- e.g. praising a girl for being pretty and a boy for being strong.

Canalisation - The ‘channelling’ of children towards toys and activities seen as normal for their sex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain gendered activities and literacy.

A

Evidence suggests that the gender gap is mainly the result of boys’ poorer literacy and language skills. Although this may result from early socialisation- e.g. because mothers do most of the reading to young children, boys may come to view reading as feminine- it is likely furthered by boys’ leisure pursuits.

Typical boys’ leisure pursuits- football, computer games etc.- do little to help develop their language and communication skills. In contrast, girls may engage in a what McRobbie and Garber (1976) call ‘bedroom culture’, centred on staying in and talking and reading magazines- activities that help to develop their language and communication skills.

Clark and Douglas (2011) found that boys enjoy reading less, with 43% of boys and 58% of girls enjoying reading either very much or quite a lot. Nearly twice as many boys than girls agreed with the statement that reading is boring and that reading is hard, and were more likely to say that they did not read outside the classroom and could not find anything that interests them to read.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

List the different ways in which social change has effected girls achievement.

A

Social changes in the last 50 years have contributed to girls’ improving educational achievement.

  • The impact of feminism
  • Changes in the family
  • Changes in women’s
    employment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the impact of feminism on girl’s achievement.

A

The feminist movement can be seen as having had considerable success in improving women’s rights and opportunities: these changes are partly reflected in what we see in the media.

Magazines aimed at teenage girls have had editorial shifts influenced by the feminist debate, now presenting a more independent and ambitious girl rather than a passive and conformist one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain Sue Sharpe’s research regarding social change and its effect on girls.

A

Sue Sharpe compared the attitudes of working-class girls in London schools in the early 1970’s and 1990’s. She found that the 1990’s girls were more confident, more assertive, more ambitious and more committed to gender equality.

Sharpe found that the main priorities of the 1970s girls were ‘love, marriage, husbands and children’, and they viewed being successful in education as unfeminine.

By the 1990s this had changed to ‘job, career and being able to support themselves’ with education being the main route to a good job. In 1994, Sue Sharpe found that girls were increasingly wary of marriage. They had seen adult relationships break up around them, and had seen women coping alone, in a ‘man’s world’.

Girls were more concerned with standing on their own two feet and were more likely to see education as a means to financial independence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the impact of changes in women’s employment on girl’s achievement.

A

Some feminist sociologists relate girls’ relative success in the past 30 years to post-industrialisation, which has transformed the attitudes of young women, and depressed the expectations of men.

The past 30+ years have seen a ‘feminisation’ of the economy- a shift to service sector work (financial services, retail, media, welfare…), with an accompanying expansion of jobs for women. As a result, girls may believe that the future offers them more choices: they are provided with the incentive to seek economic independence, and careers became a real possibility.

Wilkinson’s argument is that female aspirations underwent a radical transformation in the last two decades of the 20th century, suggesting that young women experienced a ‘genderquake’ in terms of profound changes in their attitudes and expectations about their futures, compared with their mothers and grandmothers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the family and risk as a social change affecting girls’ achievement.

A

Changes in employment and the attitudes of girls have been accompanied by changes in the family such as increase in the divorce rate, decline in first marriages, and decline in the birth rate.

Beck (1992) sees these changes as part of the growth or risk and uncertainty (‘risk society’), which lead to greater insecurity for men and women: both relationships and jobs are insecure and cannot be relied upon.

According to Beck this creates a more individualised society (the individualisation thesis), in which both men and women have to be self-reliant and financially independent.

This further increases the incentives for girls to achieve educational qualifications so that they don’t risk reliance upon a husband and are sufficiently well qualified to cope with the uncertainties of the labour market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the decline of traditional men’s jobs.

A

There is some evidence that social changes associated with a more individualised and post-industrial society have lowered the expectations of boys, and that boys in the early 21st century consequently lack confidence in themselves and experience low self-esteem.

Some commentators, notably Mac an Ghaill (1994) suggests that working-class boys are experiencing a ‘crisis of masculinity’. They are socialised into seeing their future masculine identity and role in terms of having a job and being a ‘breadwinner’, but the landscape has changed: a decline in manufacturing and heavy industry and rise in long-term unemployment; new jobs in the service sector regarded as women’s jobs; and, in some families, women may be the main breadwinner.

Consequently, traditional masculine roles are under threat. Wragg (1997) believed that pessimism about the world of work, induced by declining job prospects for males, has filtered down to primary aged boys and undermines their desire to work hard. Jackson (2006) believes that working-class male adolescents may conclude that education and qualifications are irrelevant because they can see that the jobs they will end up doing are unskilled or semi-skilled at best, and not very well paid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List the different internal factors that impact gender differences in achievement.

A

Equal opportunities policies
Teachers and pedagogy
The curriculum and assessment
Laddish subcultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain the impact of equal opportunities policies on gender differences in achievement.

A

The 1980s saw a greater emphasis on equal opportunities in schools, which resulted in the monitoring of teaching practices and resources for gender-bias in order to ensure more girl-friendly schooling. This was in part the result of the work of feminist sociologists such as Spender (1982) who found that girls were disadvantaged in multiple ways by sexism within education.

The introduction of the National Curriculum in 1988 removed one source of gender inequality by ensuring that both sexes studied the same core subjects, which was not necessarily the case previously.

Boaler argues that equal opportunity policies are a key reason for the improvement in girls’ achievement: as schooling has become more meritocratic, girls, who generally work harder, achieve more.

(-) This provides an explanation of the improvement in girls’ performance, but doesn’t explain why girls work harder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the impact of teachers and pedagogy` on gender differences in achievement.

A

Some sociologists have suggested that the school environment has become feminised.

Some research suggests that primary-school environments, which are female-dominated, exert a less positive influence on boys, and may even be alienating to them.

However, despite this, women teachers may act as important role models for girls, supporting their achievement.

Sewell (2006) has argued that schools do not nurture ‘masculine’ traits such as competitiveness and leadership, but instead celebrate the more ‘feminine’ qualities of careful working and attentiveness in class.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline some research findings regarding teachers and pedagogy.

A

The way teachers interact with boys and girls may differ- Francis found that whilst boys received more attention, they tended to be disciplined more harshly by teachers.

Sukhnanda et al. report that boys generally feel they receive less support, encouragement, and guidance from teachers, and that teachers are more critical of boys for non-academic reasons, such as bad behaviour and scruffy presentation: consequently, they view schools as alien places.

Abraham argued that schools fail to confront traditional notions of masculinity and that teachers may even collude with pupils in traditional gender stereotyping- in Abraham’s study, deviant boys were more popular with some of the teachers than academic boys and girls

Mitsos and Browne (1998) reported that teachers were not as critical with boys as girls. They may have lower expectations of boys, expecting work to be late, rushed and untidy, and expecting boys to be disruptive. These expectations may have a self-fulfilling effect, depressing the achievement of boys.

17
Q

Explain the curriculum and assessment as a factor impacting gender differences in achievement.

A

It was long proposed that girls do better at coursework, and their overtaking boys was related to the introduction of GCSEs which included coursework. Whilst this may be true, coursework elements have now been largely removed at GCSE and A-level, and girls still outperform boys- although the gap has narrowed.

It has been suggested that changes to subject content may be preferred by girls than boys- e.g. Bleach (1998) observed that girls prefer fiction to non-fiction, and boys vice-versa, with boys particularly disliking lengthy, pre-20th century fiction. Changes made by Michael Gove in 2014 required more study of classic English literature, which may disadvantage boys.

Arnot (1998) argues that girls prefer extended response tasks while boys generally prefer giving ‘correct’ answers at speed- boys performed significantly better on multiple-choice tests than girls.

18
Q

Explain laddish subcultures as a factor impacting gender differences in achievement.

A

Jackson (2006) used interviews and questionnaires to study masculinity and femininity in eight schools. She found that schools were dominated by a culture of what Connell describes hegemonic (or dominant and most valued) masculinity that valued toughness, power, and competitiveness.
Academic work was seen by boys as being essentially feminine and ‘uncool’. Boys tended to mess around to impress their peer group rather than concentrate on their work- acting out a culture of laddish masculinity.
Some boys did want to succeed, but to avoid being seen as ‘uncool’ they worked mainly at home. This disadvantaged working-class boys who had less space or facilities for work at home.
Jackson also identified ‘fear of failure’ as affecting boys’ academic efforts.
Working-class boys were particularly affected by changes in the labour market. Lacking the prospect of employment to give them a sense of identity, they used laddish behaviour to restore as sense of masculine pride.

19
Q

Explain the impact of identity and class on girls’ achievement.

A

Not all girls do well. Looking at the disaggregated data from 2019, whilst the average Attainment 8 score for all girls was 49.5, for FSM White British girls this was 34.7, and 38.2 for FSM Black Caribbean girls. Considering differences in this way has become known as taking an ‘intersectional’ approach- recognising the intersections of oppression/ disadvantage.

According to Archer et al. (2010) one part of the explanation for this may be that there is a disjuncture between the values and ethos of the school and (some) working-class girls’ feminine identities, and uses the concept of symbolic capital to understand this.

Many girls in the study experienced difficult relationships with school and adopted strategies to increase their visibility and generate capital and a valued sense of self such as speaking their mind, boyfriends and ladette femininity.

However, these practices were problematic for girls in that they produced and reinforced social inequalities and positioned the girls as ‘problematic’ learners.