gender Flashcards
androgyny AO1
Definition:
displaying a balance of masculine and feminine characteristics in ones personality
Method: BSRI
20 stereotypically feminine and 20 masculine traits + 20 neutral
ppts asked to rate themselves accordingly
Conclusion:
7 point rating scale
high M low F = masculine + low M high F = feminine
high M high F = androgynous
low M low F = undifferentiated
androgyny eval - qualitative approach > quantitative?
androgyny measured quantitatively
numerical scale quantifies the dependent variable
BUT
spence argues qualitative approach is better as gender isnt just linked to behaviours typical of one gender
combination of different scales
PAQ provides a broader assessment - doesn’tt define anyone as androgynous
assesses empathy or expressivity for a more nuanced understanding of gender roles
BSRI = qualitative assessment on a scale
PAQ = qualitative scores to a set of traits but quantitative for deeper understanding of gender roles and stereotypes
androgyny eval - valid/reliable methodology
valid + reliable methodology
scale wasn’t randomly decided
50 men 50 women ranked 200 traits on femininity/masculinity
highest scoring traits became the 20 traits used on the BSRI
+ piloted with over 1000 ppts
results reflected ppts gender identity mostly
+ high test-retest reliability with similar results a month later
lacks temporal validity - 40 years old and ideas on gender identity have changed
eg: ladettes who are more masculine wouldn’t be seen as androgynous on BSRI
results not generalisable - outdated
androgyny eval - affects well being BUT cultural variability
affects wellbeing
Bem believed androgynous traits = psychologically healthy
balance of masculine/feminine traits needed to thrive and adapt to contexts
androgynous traits = higher self esteem -> greater interpersonal relationships
encourages holistic approach, transcends traditional gender roles
+ can combat discrimination via education
BUT
cultural variability to BSRI - not universally applicable
societies with rigid gender roles mean androgynous individuals can face discrimination affecting identity
chromosomes and hormones AO1
Chromosomes:
Male: XX
Female: XY
Hormones:
Testosterone:
androgen hormone in male testes responsible (houses SRY gene) for aggression in males (animal studies)
Oestrogen:
female hormone developed in the ovaries linked with menstrual cycle + reproductive system + PMS
Oxytocin:
love hormone higher in females
promotes lactation after birth and develops a mother baby bond by reducing cortisol
Involved in
XO = turners XXY = klinfelters
chromosomes and hormones eval - support for nurture debate
support for nurture debate
case study of David Reimer - brenda (Dr Money)
botched circumcision meant david was raised a girl who played with female toys
reimer never felt truly like a girl - preferred cars
suggests biological factors outweigh environmental favouring the nature over nurture debate
newer research into idea that testosterone -> boys liking cars
increase in interest in activities involving movement and manipulation
BUT reverted to male self, wife family etc as soon as he was told supporting nature
chromosomes and hormones eval - research into role of testosterone + counter
research into role of testosterone
male hypogonadism = male testes fails to produce enough testosterone
227 men with hypogonadism given testosterone therapy for 180 days
led to significant improvement in muscle shape, improved libido,sexual function, mood
testosterone involved in male sexual arousal + development
BUT
double blind placebo study to increase testosterone levels in young healthy men found no increase in sex drives or frequency of intercourse and no change in aggression
therefore testosterone not involved in sexual function but doesn’t deny its importance in puberty
atypical sex chromosomes AO1
Klinefelter’s syndrome: XXY 1/600 males
Underdeveloped testes
rounder hips
body hair
poor reading ability/ language skills
lack interest in sexual activity + shy
memory issues
emotional
difficulty problem solving
clumsiness
Turner’s syndrome: XO 1/5000 women
Webbed neck
prepubescent appearance
Childlike personality
higher than average reading ability
lack of menstrual cycle (no ovaries)
broad shield chest
poor visual memory
atypical sex chromosomes eval - correlational relationship
correlational relationship:
unclear if the psychological symptoms occur as a result of syndrome or other factors
childlike personality in Turner’s syndrome may have developed due to prepubescent appearance causing others to view them as younger - treated differently
BUT
comparing those with abnormal chromosomes to normal ones makes it clear whether behavioural changes occur due to a biological basis or not
atypical sex chromosomes eval - treatment
treatments
research -> treatments for syndromes
australian study of 87 people found individuals are more likely to be treated at a younger age than when older
easier to manage symptoms when identified at a younger age
many people don’t know they have syndrome - no treatment
increased awareness of symptoms can have practical applications for treatment
turners =range of symptoms with large variability - complex treatments requiring early medical intervention
atypical sex chromosomes eval - exaggerated symptoms
exaggerated symptoms
full range of characteristics can only be determined via comparison of a large number of individuals with syndrome
typically only those with severe symptoms are identified but many people have syndrome and live normally
not all symptoms as extreme
milder forms not included in description
kohlbergs cognitive theory AO1
understanding of gender runs in parallel to intellectual development and maturity
gradual changes between stages
- Gender identity - 2 years old
Child understands own gender and can label others accordingly
but doesnt understand gender is permanent (boy may want to “grow up to be a mummy”) - Gender stability - 4 years old
child understands that one’s own gender is fixed but can be confused by appearances (female builder becomes a man) - gender constancy - 6-7 years old
gender is constant over time and situations - Child behaves in gender appropriate ways
kohlbergs theory eval - research support BUT counter research
research support:
damon told children about ‘george’ who plays with dolls
4 year olds believed that was fine (gender stability)
6 year olds said it was wrong
developed rules = rigid gender stereotypes which supports kohlberg - gender constancy means gender stereotypes form
BUT
bussey and bandura reported children as young as 4 felt good playing with gender appropriate toys and bad with the opposite
supports gender schema theory where children absorb gender appropriate info during gender identity
development could affect stages
kohlbergs theory eval - reductionist
reductionist
ignores social factors affecting stages of gender development
parents may unconsciously reinforce gender expectations in their relationships on to children
children can be treated differently as well
positive reinforcement for boy and cars etc
or stages may occur earlier but child cannot articulate before 2 (when speech develops) - affected by speed of development
kohlbergs theory eval - cross cultural support BUT may not be generalisable everywhere
cross cultural support
munroe et al found similar findings in cross cultural research
cognitive changes = universal = biologically based
Child rearing and socialisation processes are different in different societies, whereas biological development remains fairly constant
BUT
gender fluid cultures may not follow linear pattern presented by kohlberg
theory not entirely generalisable
no research on children of lesbian parents may develop ideas on gender differently
gender schema theory AO1
Martin and Halverson
Gender schema = organised set of beliefs (mental framework) actively derived from experience. (Acquired during gender identity not constancy as believed by kohlberg)
Child has a better understanding of their own ingroup and ignore ideas about their outgroup
Guides understanding of stereotypical gender appropriate behaviour once a child has established gender identity around 2-3 yrs they will begin to actively seek out appropriate behaviours for their gender
at 8 - gender schema developed for both genders
gender development = driven by readiness to organise gender related info using gender schema
gender schema theory eval - research support
martin + halverson found children under 6 were more likely to remember photographs of gender stereotypical behaviours compared to gender inappropriate
children changed gender of people to align with stereotypes + were more likely to recall a woman washing dishes than a woman fixing a car
proves children under 6 are subject to memory bias (contrasts kohlberg who says this happens later)
+ children as young as 2 show gender appropriate play
BUT oversimplifies gender identity
schema are rigid compared to fluidity of gender + individuals who don’t fit into binary categories - M/F
schema does not encompass entire spectrum of gender experiences
psychodynamic approach AO1
Psychodynamic
psychosexual stages lead to gender development in phallic stage 3-6 years old
oedipus complex - boy resolves love for mum and hatred for father (castration anxiety) by identifying with father
electra complex - girls penis envy and eventually identify with mother
both sexes identify with same sex parents to resolve complexes -> internalisation as child adopts attitudes/behaviour of parent
little hans = fear of horses came about due to castration anxiety
displaced fear onto horses (defence mechanisms)
electra = girl has double resentment for father as hes a love rival so experiences penis envy and represses feelings with father to identify with mother
gender schema theory eval - can account for cultural differences
can account for cultural differences (cherry)
gender schema influences not only information processing but also what counts as culturally-appropriate gender behaviour
eg traditional cultures = women are expected to be nurturing and men are expected to pursue careers
children form a schema consistent with these views
less rigid gender boundaries = children develop more fluid gender schema.
schema not universal but culturally constructed
GST can be used to promote greater inclusivity for perspectives on gender identity across different cultures
gender schema theory eval - gender identity may develop earlier + counter
gender identity develops earlier:
data collected from mothers of 9-21 month olds video tapes found
children begin to label themselves as a ‘boy’ or ‘girl’ by 19 months, as soon as they begin to communicate (not 2-3 yrs old)
BUT
key point is the shifts in a child’s thinking, ages are not absolute
sequence of development is more important than the exact age at which stages occur and children may move through stages at different rates
psychodynamic eval - pseudoscience
pseudoscience
karl popper argues theory lacks falsifiability
cannot prove penis envy or oedipus/electra complexes - unconscious forces + subjective case studies
cant be proved wrong via scientific testing unlike biological/chromosomal explanation
lacks objectivity from lab studies
lacks validity
psychodynamic eval - inadequate research on female development
inadequate account of women’s development
the concept of penis envy has been criticised as reflecting the male dominated Victorian era where men held so much power.
Horney argued that womb envy is a more powerful emotion
suggests that envies are cultural rather than biological
challenges the idea that women’s gender development is based on a desire to be like men, = androcentric bias
psychodynamic eval - support for oedipus complex + lesbian counter
support for oedipus complex
Rekers and Morey = a connection between father absence and gender identity issues in boys
rated the gender identity of 49 boys aged 3-11 years -> 75% of ‘gender disturbed’ had neither their biological father nor a substitute father living with them
Being raised without a father may negatively impact gender identity, aligning with Freud’s predictions
BUT
children of lesbian parents felt less pressure to conform to gender stereotypes and did not exhibit differences in psychosocial adjustment or gender identity.
contradicts Freud’s theory, suggesting that fathers are not necessary for healthy gender identity development
social learning theory of gender AO1
Social Learning Theory
gender behaviours learned via observation
influential figures like parents, peers, and media shape gender development
Direct reinforcement = praise or encouragement
Indirect reinforcement = observing others’ favourable outcomes
contributes to behaviour, repetition or avoidance based on consequences
Identification = attaching to individuals perceived as desirable role models - typically of same gender
Modelling, demonstrated by role models and imitated by observers, solidifies learned behaviours
Mediational processes: ARMM
attention
retention
motivation
motor reproduction