Gender Flashcards
Sex and Gender Overview
Sex and gender are different things, despite the fact that are used interchangeably in every day life, therefore suggesting they are the same
Psychologists, however, recognise them as separate concepts
It is important to be clear on this distinction and how our social and cultural understanding of what it means to be a man or a woman given rise to sex-role stereotypes
Sex
This refers to our biological status as either male or female
- it is binary
This is determines by one pair of chromosomes
- male = XY
- female = XX
These chromosomes then influence hormonal differences and anatomical differences
Hormone differences:
- testosterone in male
- oestrogen in females
Anatomical differences:
- different genitalia
- body hair
- muscle and hair distribution
- body shape
- height
Gender
This refers to a person’s psychosocial status as either masculine or feminine
- how you understand yourself
It includes all the attitudes, roles and behaviours we associates with ‘being a man’ or ‘being a woman’
These are heavy influenced by social norms or cultural expectations
Sex vs Gender
Sex is innate and the result of nature
- it can’t be changed
Gender is at least partly environmental and is therefore due to nurture
Gender is a social construct rather than a biological fact
- it is therefore not ‘fixed’ but rather futile and open to change
- a person may become ‘more masculine’ or ‘more feminine’ depending on the social context they are in and the norms and expectations associated with it
- for example, woman may become competitive in the workplace or a man kind and nurturing with a child
Sex-role stereotypes
Sex-role stereotypes are a set of shared expectations that people within a society or a culture hold about what is acceptable or usual behaviour for men and women
Sex-role stereotype examples
Male stereotypes:
Breadwinners
Least interactive parent
No emotions
Strong
Men will be men
Workplace
Messy
Sporty
Encouraged to have many sexual partners
Showing emotions is weak
Female stereotypes:
Overly emotional
Household jobs
Stay at home
Irrational
Weak
Don’t belong in the workplace
Should submit to men
Bad drivers
Must be put together at all times
Parental figure
Accused of sleeping around if they have many sexual partners
Sex-role stereotype origins
Stereotypes are a type of schema
- they come from experience, such as family, friends, media, shops
These ideas come from agents of socialisation
The dangers of this include:
- lower self-esteem if you don’t fit in the stereotype
- limiting - don’t do things so you don’t get judged
- discriminate based on the stereotypes
Androgyny
Many researchers have suggested that in recent decades there has been a blurring of the distinction between masculinity and femininity
It is claimed that young people in particular are becoming increasingly androgynous in their behaviours and attitudes
Androgyny
In every day language, when we talk of someone being ‘androgynous’, we are usually referring to someone who has the appearance of someone who can’t be clearly identified as a man or woman
However, in psychological language, androgyny, refers to a personality type that is characterised by a balance of masculine and feminine traits, attitudes and behaviour
- For example, a man or woman who is both ambitious at work (masculine trait) and a warm parent at home (feminine trait)
Bede suggested that high androgyny is associated with psychological well-being
- this may be because it allows you to feel confident and be successful in different areas of your life
However, this assumption has been challenged
- some researchers have argued that people who have greater proportion of masculine traits are better adjusted
- this may be because these traits are more typically valued in Western Societies
- this could boost self esteem
BSRI
Bem (1974) developed the Bem Sex Role Inventory, the first systematic attempt to measure androgyny
It present 60 traits (20 that are commonly identified as masculine, 20 feminine, 20 neutral)
These traits were chosen by asking 50 male and 50 males (these were not ppts ad just helped to make the study) judges to rate 200 traits in terms of how much the traits represented ‘maleness’ and ‘femaleness’
The 20 traits that scored highest on ‘maleness’ and ‘femalness’ went on the inventory
This is a strength of the BSRI because she used both males and females to develop the BSRI, may give a more valid view of male an female traits
- she also used a large number
- and it was also developed objectively and unbiased
It uses a rating scale, in that participants are asked to rate each trait on a 7 point rating scale
- 1 = never true of me
- 7 = always true of me
This is an ordinal scale, which is not fixed, giving it objectivity
- one person’s interpretation may be different to another’s
- it is also giving quantitative data, which is easy to statistically analyse
- however it lacks the depth and richness we get from qualitative data
The inventory treats masculinity and femininity as as 2 independent dimensions, thereby making it possible to characterise a person as masculine, feminine, androgynous or undifferentiated
There is a graph, the Y-axis being femininity and the X-axis being masculinity, each quadrant representing one of the 4 areas
How the BSRI works
Some of the traits on the questionnaire include things such as:
- acts as a leader
- childlike
- analytical
- compassionate
- independent
- sympathetic
Once you have given the rating of all of the characteristics, you add your scores up for each column
You then add column 1 and 5 (masculine) and 3 and 6 (feminine)
You then substrate your feminine traits score from your masculine traits score, to receive your Bem score
The androgyny scale is as follows:
- masculine >+20
- nearly masculine +10 to +19
- androgynous +9 to -9
- nearly feminine -10 to -19
Feminine <-20
BSRI Strengths
In the original study, Bem firstly piloted the BSRI with over 1000 college junior college students, and their results broadly corresponded with their own description of their gender identity
- a large sample, increased generalisability
- the agreement in score and own description suggests the BSRI has high internal validity
A follow up study in which she asked 561 males and 356 females (all from the pilot sample) to re-complete the BSRI a month later produced similar scores
- shows evidence for external reliability, consistency in results over time, as she did test-retest
BSRI Limitations
The BSRI was developed 50 years ago in the USA using college students
- 50 years ago might be out of date, and may lack temporal validity
- traits considered “male” or “female” may have shifted over time
- the BSRI may contain outdated sex role stereotypes
- lack of population validity
- college students tend to be more liberal, or moe uncertain of themselves at this point in their life - they tend to be more non-conforming
- also developed in the USA and assumes that the ‘male’ and ‘female’ traits are the sae around the world
- its rather ethnocentric (beta culture bias)
However, a 1998 replication of Bem’s method (including the development of the traits) found that all but 2 of the traits were validated
The BSRI appears to be valid across geography and culture as it has been used in places such as Zimbabwe, Japan and China with good validity and reliability when a few items were removed to improve cultural fit
In addition, Carver et al (2013) used an abridged version of the BSRI with an older population (65+) living in Brazil and the findings showed that the BSRI appears to be valid across age groups
The BSRI requires people to rate themselves on a questionnaire - self-repot method
- people may show social-desirability bias
- they may give slightly different answers than what were true so they could score what they desired or to fit in with their peers
- its rather hard to rate yourself and have insight into yourself
- very long questionnaire and some people might rush through it because you get bored and not thoroughly think about the answers given
- people might not know what all of the terms mean
The role of chromosomes and hormones overview
From a prude biological perspective, sex and gedner are one and the same
Behavioural, psychological and social differences are seen to be the result of anatomical, chromosomal and hormonal differences within the body
Chromosomes
Male and female embryos up to 8 weeks have external genitalia that look the same
- at 8 weeks, genetically XY males produce androgens which stimulates the development of male genitalia (as the Y carries a gene called ‘sex-determining Y’)
- in XX females this process don’t take place, thus the female genitalia develop
The ovum can only supply an X (female), the sperm can contribute either an X or a Y (male)
- if the sperm contributes a Y, the zygote will be genetically male (XY), whereas if the sperm contribute an X, the zygote will be fable (XX)
There are 46 chromosomes in humans, arranges in 23 pairs
The sex of a baby is determined at conception when the sperm and ovum form a zygote (fertilised egg)
- the sperm and the egg both contribute to the zygote
- the 23 pairs of these contains DNA instructions to determine the zygote’s sex
Hormones
Males and females produces many of the same hormones, but in different concentrations
These are chemical substances secreted by the glands throughout the body and carried in the bloodstream
At puberty, during adolescence, a burst of activity from hormones triggers the development of secondary sexual characteristics such as pubic hair
Prenatally (in the womb), hormones act upon brain development, causing development of the reproductive organs
Testosterone
This is a male hormone, although it is present in small quantities in women
When released in the womb, this hormone causes the development of the male sex organs (at 8 weeks)
- if a genetic male produces no testosterone during foetal development then no male sex organs appear (meaning that the newly born infant - although genetically male - will have female genitals and be assigned female a birth)
- if a genetic female produces high levels of this hormone during foetal development, then male sex organs may appear
Testosterone is associated with typically male behaviours such as:
- aggression
- competitiveness
- Visio-Spatial abilities
- higher sexual drive
This may have evolutionary benefits, such as aggression towards rivals allows males to compete for the opportunity to mate with a fertile female
Oestrogen
This is a female hormone that governs the development of secondary sexual characteristics and menstruation from adolescence onwards
Alongside the physical changes, it can cause some women to experience heightened emotionality and irritability during their menstrual cycle, referred to as PSM (pre-menstrual tension)
- this is referred to as PMS (pre-menstrual syndrome) when these effects become a diagnosed disorder
- PMS has been used (successfully) as a defence in cases of shoplifting and even murder
Oxytocin
Women typically produce this in much larger amounts than men, particularly as a result of giving brith
- it is released in massive quantities during labour and after child birth and makes new mothers feel ‘in love’ with their baby
It stimulates lactation (making breastfeeding possible), reduces the stress hormone cortisol and facilitates bonding
The fact that men produce less oxytocin has, in the past, fuelled the popular stereotype that men are less interested in intimacy and closeness in a relationship
- however, both sexes produce this hormone in roughly equal amounts during intimate sexual activities
Evidence for biology
One strength is that there is a large body of research evidence that supports the role of chromosomes and hormones in gender development
For example research into CAH (congenital adrenal hyperplasia), a rare genetic disorder that causes high prenatal levels of male hormones such as testosterone. A 2003 study found that females with CAH are often described by their family and friends as being ‘tomboys’, exhibit higher levels of aggression that other girls and show a preference for ‘male’ toys
This is evidence for biology because it does suggest biological factors (hormones) are involved in gender)
However, we do need to be cautious of these findings due to confirmation bias. Parents may be looking for “evidence” that support their expectation that their daughter will be tom-boyish
Another strength is that there is further evidence
For example, research by Wang et al, (2000) showed the link between testosterone and sexual behaviour. 227 hypogonadal men (men whose testes failed to produce normal levels of testosterone) were given testosterone therapy for 180 days. The testosterone therapy improved sexual function, libido and mood, and significant increases in muscle strength were observed across the sample.
This is for biology because it shows that testosterone has a powerful influenced on male gender development
However, a double-blind placebo study by O’Conner et al (2004) increased testosterone levels in healthy young men. There were no significant increases in frequency of sexual activity or sex drive reported. Neither were there any changes in aggression or anger levels. These are contradictory findings. You would predict they would become ‘hyper-masculine’ however they didn’t
There are also case studies that show evidence for biology.
For example, the case study of David Reiner, also known as ‘they boy without a penis’. In the 60s, David Reiner went through a botched circumcision, which resulted in him losing his penis. Hi9s parents were told to take him home and raise him as a girl, and the issue would be resolved. However, this didn’t work (even despite the fact that he was put on hormone replacement therapy once he hit puberty) and David always strongly associated with masculinity throughout his life and began living as a male later in life.
This is evidence for biology because it shows that Reiner must have had an innate part of his gender, as if biology didn’t play a role in gender, he would have happily lived his life as a girl rather than feeling much moe masculine
However, this was a case study. Case studies are very specific to each individual person. While Reimer behaved how he did in this study, there is nothing to suggest that someone else would behave in the same way. And we are unable to repeat thus, as it is a very unusual circumstance and it would be highly unethical to purposefully put someone in this position for a psychological study
Evidence against biology
One limitation of biological explanations of gender development is that they are biologically reductionist and they ignore other,psychological, explanations of gender development.
For example, cognitive explanations of gender development such as gender schema theory, which suggests that young children develop a set of beliefs about the sexes which help determine what the child attends to and how they interpret the world. There are also psychodynamic explanations of gender development.
This is a limitation because it suggests that gender is more complex that its biological influences alone.
A second limitation of biological explanations of gender is that they ignore the role of social factors in gender-related behaviour.
For example, Hofstede et al (2010) argue that gender roles around the world are much more a consequence of social norms rather than biology. Indeed, these researchers equate notions of masculinity and femininity with whether whole cutlers are individualist or collectivist. Individualistic cultures such as the UK and US are, according to Hofstede, more masculine in their outlook, meaning that traditional masculine traits are more highly valued with these societies, in turn shaping gender and behaviour and attitudes. These cultures are individualist cultures where the focus is on the success of you as an individual. This requires showing more masculine traits such as ambition and competitiveness.
This is a limitation because it challenges biological explanations of gender, suggesting that social factors may ultimately be more important in gender development.
Atypical sex chromosome patterns Introduction
We need to be aware that not all individuals conform to the typical XX or XY chromosome pattern
2 such examples are individuals with Klinefelter’s syndrome and Turner’s syndrome
In addition to considering the physical and psychological differences that are characteristic to these conditions, we also need to be able to use what atypical sex chromosomes contribute to our understanding of the nature-nurture debate with regards to gender development
Klinefelter’s syndrome
Psychological characteristics:
- poor reading abilities
- passive and shy
- poor language skills
- poor memory and problems-solving skills
- don’t respond well to stressful situations
Physical characteristics:
- rounding of body contours
- reduced body hair
- gynaecomastia
- long limbs
- under developed genitals
- co-ordination problems
General information:
- extra X chromosome
- affects around 1 in 600
- biologically male
Turner’s syndrome
Psychological characteristics:
- socially immature
- higher than average reading ability
- poor spatial awareness
- poor memory and mathematical skills
- difficulty fitting in
Physical characteristics:
- ovaries fail to develop
- hips not bigger than waist
- don’t develop breasts
- don’t have a mesntural cycle
- webbed neck
- appearance of a prepubescent girl
General information:
- absence of an X chromosome
- affects 1 in 5000
- biologically female
Strengths of research into atypical sex chromosomes
One strength of research into atypical sex chromosome patterns is its contribution to the nature-nature debate
For example, by comparing people who have these symptoms with chromosome-typical individuals, it becomes possible to see psychological and behavioural differences between the two groups. For example, individuals who lack x-chromosomes are socially immature. This suggests that the X-chromosome is important in managing social situations. This can also be seen because people with an extra X-chromosome respond poorly to stressful situations. It might be logically inferred that these differences have a biological basis and are a direct result of the abnormal chromosomal structure
This is a strength because it supports the view that innate ‘nature’ influences have a powerful effect on psychology and behaviour
However, there are issues in leaping to this conclusion
For example, it may be environmental and social factors seen in individuals with Klinefelter’s and Turner’s syndrome are more responsible than for the behavioural differences observed. Parents, peers and others may react differently to the prepubescent appearance of people with Turner’s syndrome by treating them in a child like way, which might in turn encourage immature behaviour which might also have an impact of their academic performance.
This shows how it could be wrong to assume that psychological and behavioural differences in people with atypical sex chromosome patterns are fully due to nature
Another strength of the research is its application into managing the syndrome.
Continued research into atypical sex chromosome patterns is likely to lead to earlier and more accurate diagnoses of the syndromes, as well as treatments to manage the conditions. Treatments for Klinefelter’s syndrome include testosterone therapy to increase muscle strength, libido and growth of body hair treating Turner’s syndrome includes giving growth hormones in childhood to help increase adult height by a several cm and oestrogen therapy at puberty to help stimulate the menstrual cycle.
This is a strength because it shows that increased awareness and knowledge of atypical sex chromosome patterns does have a useful real-world application. A 2011 Australian study of 87 individuals with Klinefelter’s syndrome showed that those ho had been identified and treated from a very young age experiences significant benefits in terms of managing their syndrome compared to those who had been diagnosed in adulthood
Limitations of research into atypical sex chromosome patterns
One limitation with the description of Klinefelter’s syndrome in particular is that there may be a sampling issue
For example, Boada et al (2009) reported that many individuals with Klinefelter’s syndrome do not experience significant cognitive or psychological problems, and many are highly successful academically and in their personal lives and careers. However, in general only those who have the most severe symptoms are identified.
This is a limitation because it suggests that the typical picture of people with these syndromes may well be exaggerated, distorting the picture of ‘typical symptoms’