Gas exchange ( Practise paper is in revision wallet ) Flashcards
Scientist studied three species of plant.
They selected fully grown leaves from five different plants of each species.
For each leaf they measured:
- leaf surface area
- leaf thickness
- the number of stomata per mm^2
The scientists’ results are shown in the table below.
Plant species
1 ) A
2 ) B
3 ) C
Mean leaf surface area / mm^2
1 ) 218.0
2 ) 17.0
3 ) 2.2
Mean leaf thickness / micrometer
1 ) 191.5
2 ) 296.3
3 ) 354.8
Mean number of stomata per mm^2
1 ) 380.0
2 ) 136.0
3 ) 419.0
How did the scientist ensure they could make a valid comparison between leaves from different species?
- Scientist used fully grown leaves
Describe a method you could use to find the surface area of a leaf.
( Scientist studied three species of plant.
They selected fully grown leaves from five different plants of each species.
For each leaf they measured:
leaf surface area
leaf thickness
the number of stomata per mm^2
The scientists’ results are shown in the table below.
Plant species
1 ) A
2 ) B
3 ) C
Mean leaf surface area / mm^2
1 ) 218.0
2 ) 17.0
3 ) 2.2
Mean leaf thickness / micrometer
1 ) 191.5
2 ) 296.3
3 ) 354.8
Mean number of stomata per mm^2
1 ) 380.0
2 ) 136.0
3 ) 419.0 )
- Draw around the leaf on graph paper
- Count the squares
- Multiply it by 2
Which species, A or B, would you predict grew in a drier environment?
Explain one feature that caused you to choose this species.
( Scientist studied three species of plant.
They selected fully grown leaves from five different plants of each species.
For each leaf they measured:
leaf surface area
leaf thickness
the number of stomata per mm^2
The scientists’ results are shown in the table below.
Plant species
1 ) A
2 ) B
3 ) C
Mean leaf surface area / mm^2
1 ) 218.0
2 ) 17.0
3 ) 2.2
Mean leaf thickness / micrometer
1 ) 191.5
2 ) 296.3
3 ) 354.8
Mean number of stomata per mm^2
1 ) 380.0
2 ) 136.0
3 ) 419.0 )
- Species B
- Smaller surface area so less evaporation
Other than the features of leaves in the table above, give two features of leaves of xerophytes.
For each feature explain how it reduces water loss.
( Scientist studied three species of plant.
They selected fully grown leaves from five different plants of each species.
For each leaf they measured:
leaf surface area
leaf thickness
the number of stomata per mm^2
The scientists’ results are shown in the table below.
Plant species
1 ) A
2 ) B
3 ) C
Mean leaf surface area / mm^2
1 ) 218.0
2 ) 17.0
3 ) 2.2
Mean leaf thickness / micrometer
1 ) 191.5
2 ) 296.3
3 ) 354.8
Mean number of stomata per mm^2
1 ) 380.0
2 ) 136.0
3 ) 419.0 )
- Feature 1 - Hairs on leaves
- Explanations - so an increase in humidity
- Feature 2 - curled leaves
- Explanation - so a decrease in water potential gradient
Species C has a high number of stomata per mm^2.
Despite this it loses a small amount of water.
Use the date to explain why.
( Scientist studied three species of plant.
They selected fully grown leaves from five different plants of each species.
For each leaf they measured:
leaf surface area
leaf thickness
the number of stomata per mm^2
The scientists’ results are shown in the table below.
Plant species
1 ) A
2 ) B
3 ) C
Mean leaf surface area / mm^2
1 ) 218.0
2 ) 17.0
3 ) 2.2
Mean leaf thickness / micrometer
1 ) 191.5
2 ) 296.3
3 ) 354.8
Mean number of stomata per mm^2
1 ) 380.0
2 ) 136.0
3 ) 419.0 )
- Small surface area so total number of stomata is low
Scientists studied the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by grape plant leaves.
Grape leaves have stomata on the lower surface but no stomata on the upper surface.
The scientists recorded the carbon dioxide uptake by grape leaves with three different treatments:
Treatment 1 - No air-sealing grease was applied to either surface of the leaf.
Treatment 2 - The lower surface of the leaf was covered in air-sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
Treatment 3 - Both the lower surface and the upper surface of the leaf were covered in air-sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
The scientists measured the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by each leaf for 60 minutes in light and then for 20 minutes in the dark.
The scientists’ results are shown in the diagram below.
( Diagram shows “ Mean rate of carbon dioxide uptake / arbitrary units “ against “ Time / minutes “ )
( Light is turned off after “ 60 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 1 “ starts from “ 4.5 “ and maintains that value until “ 60 mins “ has been reached )
( “ Treatment 1 “ descends rapidly to “ 0 “ from “ 60 mins “ to “ 80 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 2 “ starts from “ 0.5 “ and maintains that value until “ 60 mins “ has been reached )
( “ Treatment 2 “ descends to “ 0 “ from “ 60 mins “ to “ 80 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 3 “ starts at “ 0 “ and maintains that value over the course of “ 80 mins “ )
Suggest the purpose of each of the three leaf treatments.
- Treatement 1 has no grease, so stomata are open
- Treatment 2 has grease on lower surface, which stops CO2 uptake through stomata
- Treatment 3 has grease on both surfaces, which stops all CO2 uptake
Describe the results shown in treatment 1.
( Scientists studied the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by grape plant leaves.
Grape leaves have stomata on the lower surface but no stomata on the upper surface.
The scientists recorded the carbon dioxide uptake by grape leaves with three different treatments:
Treatment 1 - No air-sealing grease was applied to either surface of the leaf.
Treatment 2 - The lower surface of the leaf was covered in air-sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
Treatment 3 - Both the lower surface and the upper surface of the leaf were covered in air-sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
The scientists measured the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by each leaf for 60 minutes in light and then for 20 minutes in the dark.
The scientists’ results are shown in the diagram below.
( Diagram shows “ Mean rate of carbon dioxide uptake / arbitrary units “ against “ Time / minutes “ )
( Light is turned off after “ 60 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 1 “ starts from “ 4.5 “ and maintains that value until “ 60 mins “ has been reached )
( “ Treatment 1 “ descends rapidly to “ 0 “ from “ 60 mins “ to “ 80 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 2 “ starts from “ 0.5 “ and maintains that value until “ 60 mins “ has been reached )
( “ Treatment 2 “ descends to “ 0 “ from “ 60 mins “ to “ 80 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 3 “ starts at “ 0 “ and maintains that value over the course of “ 80 mins “ ) )
- The mean rate of CO2 uptake was constant and fell after the light turned off
- Uptake fell from 4.5 to 0
The stomata close when the light is turned off.
Explain the advantage of this to the plant.
( Scientists studied the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by grape plant leaves.
Grape leaves have stomata on the lower surface but no stomata on the upper surface.
The scientists recorded the carbon dioxide uptake by grape leaves with three different treatments:
Treatment 1 - No air-sealing grease was applied to either surface of the leaf.
Treatment 2 - The lower surface of the leaf was covered in air-sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
Treatment 3 - Both the lower surface and the upper surface of the leaf were covered in air-sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
The scientists measured the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by each leaf for 60 minutes in light and then for 20 minutes in the dark.
The scientists’ results are shown in the diagram below.
( Diagram shows “ Mean rate of carbon dioxide uptake / arbitrary units “ against “ Time / minutes “ )
( Light is turned off after “ 60 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 1 “ starts from “ 4.5 “ and maintains that value until “ 60 mins “ has been reached )
( “ Treatment 1 “ descends rapidly to “ 0 “ from “ 60 mins “ to “ 80 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 2 “ starts from “ 0.5 “ and maintains that value until “ 60 mins “ has been reached )
( “ Treatment 2 “ descends to “ 0 “ from “ 60 mins “ to “ 80 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 3 “ starts at “ 0 “ and maintains that value over the course of “ 80 mins “ ) )
- Water is lost through the stomata
- Closed stomata prevents water loss
Treatment 2 shows that even when the lower surface of the leaf is sealed there is still some uptake of carbon dioxide.
Suggest how this uptake of carbon dioxide continues.
( Scientists studied the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by grape plant leaves.
Grape leaves have stomata on the lower surface but no stomata on the upper surface.
The scientists recorded the carbon dioxide uptake by grape leaves with three different treatments:
Treatment 1 - No air-sealing grease was applied to either surface of the leaf.
Treatment 2 - The lower surface of the leaf was covered in air-sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
Treatment 3 - Both the lower surface and the upper surface of the leaf were covered in air-sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
The scientists measured the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by each leaf for 60 minutes in light and then for 20 minutes in the dark.
The scientists’ results are shown in the diagram below.
( Diagram shows “ Mean rate of carbon dioxide uptake / arbitrary units “ against “ Time / minutes “ )
( Light is turned off after “ 60 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 1 “ starts from “ 4.5 “ and maintains that value until “ 60 mins “ has been reached )
( “ Treatment 1 “ descends rapidly to “ 0 “ from “ 60 mins “ to “ 80 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 2 “ starts from “ 0.5 “ and maintains that value until “ 60 mins “ has been reached )
( “ Treatment 2 “ descends to “ 0 “ from “ 60 mins “ to “ 80 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 3 “ starts at “ 0 “ and maintains that value over the course of “ 80 mins “ ) )
- There is CO2 uptake through the upper surface of the leaf
In both treatment 1 and 2, the uptake of carbon dioxide falls to zero when the light is turned off.
Explain why.
( Scientists studied the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by grape plant leaves.
Grape leaves have stomata on the lower surface but no stomata on the upper surface.
The scientists recorded the carbon dioxide uptake by grape leaves with three different treatments:
Treatment 1 - No air-sealing grease was applied to either surface of the leaf.
Treatment 2 - The lower surface of the leaf was covered in air-sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
Treatment 3 - Both the lower surface and the upper surface of the leaf were covered in air-sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
The scientists measured the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by each leaf for 60 minutes in light and then for 20 minutes in the dark.
The scientists’ results are shown in the diagram below.
( Diagram shows “ Mean rate of carbon dioxide uptake / arbitrary units “ against “ Time / minutes “ )
( Light is turned off after “ 60 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 1 “ starts from “ 4.5 “ and maintains that value until “ 60 mins “ has been reached )
( “ Treatment 1 “ descends rapidly to “ 0 “ from “ 60 mins “ to “ 80 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 2 “ starts from “ 0.5 “ and maintains that value until “ 60 mins “ has been reached )
( “ Treatment 2 “ descends to “ 0 “ from “ 60 mins “ to “ 80 mins “ )
( “ Treatment 3 “ starts at “ 0 “ and maintains that value over the course of “ 80 mins “ ) )
- No use of CO2 in photosynthesis in the dark
- So no diffusion gradient for CO2 into the leaf
A scientist used grasshoppers to investigate the effect of composition of air on breathing rate in insects.
He changed the composition of air they breathed in by varying the
concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide.
The scientist collected 20 mature grasshoppers from a meadow.
He placed the grasshoppers in a small chamber where he could adjust and control the composition of air surrounding them.
The small chamber restricted the movement of the grasshoppers.
His results for three of the grasshoppers are shown in the table below in the form in which he presented them.
Gas
1 ) Oxygen
2 ) Carbon dioxide
Breathing rate of grasshopper in different types of air / breaths per minute
3 ) Grasshopper 1
4 ) Grasshopper 2
5 ) Grasshopper 3
Percentage of oxygen and carbon dioxide in different types of air breathed in by grasshopper
A ) Air from atmosthere
B ) Pure oxygen
C ) Gas mixture 1
D ) Gas mixture 2
1A ) 20.9
2A ) 0.1
3A ) 53
4A ) 48
5A ) 61
1B ) 100.0
2B ) 0.0
3B ) 11
4B ) 25
5B ) 13
1C ) 91.0
2C ) 9.0
3C ) 99
4C ) 88
5C ) 96
1D ) 84.0
2D ) 16.0
3D ) 107
4D ) 99
5D ) 93
The percentages of oxygen and carbon dioxide in column A do not add up to 100% but in columns C and D they do.
Suggest two reasons for this difference.
- Other gases in the atmosphere
- Composition of gas in A are not controlled
Use all the data to describe the effect of concentration of carbon dioxide on the breathing rate of grasshoppers.
( A scientist used grasshoppers to investigate the effect of composition of air on breathing rate in insects.
He changed the composition of air they breathed in by varying the
concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide.
The scientist collected 20 mature grasshoppers from a meadow.
He placed the grasshoppers in a small chamber where he could adjust and control the composition of air surrounding them.
The small chamber restricted the movement of the grasshoppers.
His results for three of the grasshoppers are shown in the table below in the form in which he presented them.
Gas
1 ) Oxygen
2 ) Carbon dioxide
Breathing rate of grasshopper in different types of air / breaths per minute
3 ) Grasshopper 1
4 ) Grasshopper 2
5 ) Grasshopper 3
Percentage of oxygen and carbon dioxide in different types of air breathed in by grasshopper
A ) Air from atmosthere
B ) Pure oxygen
C ) Gas mixture 1
D ) Gas mixture 2
1A ) 20.9
2A ) 0.1
3A ) 53
4A ) 48
5A ) 61
1B ) 100.0
2B ) 0.0
3B ) 11
4B ) 25
5B ) 13
1C ) 91.0
2C ) 9.0
3C ) 99
4C ) 88
5C ) 96
1D ) 84.0
2D ) 16.0
3D ) 107
4D ) 99
5D ) 93 )
- Breathing rate of the grasshoppers is the lowest when there’s no CO2
- Presence of CO2 increases breathing rate
- Breathing rate increases when CO2 is higher than 0.1%
One of the different types of air was similar to the air in the meadow where the grasshoppers were collected.
It provides data that might be used to calculate a mean breathing rate for grasshoppers in the meadow.
Use the data to estimate the mean breathing rate of the three grasshoppers in the meadow.
How your working.
( A scientist used grasshoppers to investigate the effect of composition of air on breathing rate in insects.
He changed the composition of air they breathed in by varying the
concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide.
The scientist collected 20 mature grasshoppers from a meadow.
He placed the grasshoppers in a small chamber where he could adjust and control the composition of air surrounding them.
The small chamber restricted the movement of the grasshoppers.
His results for three of the grasshoppers are shown in the table below in the form in which he presented them.
Gas
1 ) Oxygen
2 ) Carbon dioxide
Breathing rate of grasshopper in different types of air / breaths per minute
3 ) Grasshopper 1
4 ) Grasshopper 2
5 ) Grasshopper 3
Percentage of oxygen and carbon dioxide in different types of air breathed in by grasshopper
A ) Air from atmosthere
B ) Pure oxygen
C ) Gas mixture 1
D ) Gas mixture 2
1A ) 20.9
2A ) 0.1
3A ) 53
4A ) 48
5A ) 61
1B ) 100.0
2B ) 0.0
3B ) 11
4B ) 25
5B ) 13
1C ) 91.0
2C ) 9.0
3C ) 99
4C ) 88
5C ) 96
1D ) 84.0
2D ) 16.0
3D ) 107
4D ) 99
5D ) 93 )
- 53 + 48 + 61 /3 = 54
The estimate does not provide a reliable value for the mean breathing rate of all insect species in the meadow.
Other than being an estimate, suggest and explain three reasons why this value would not be reliable.
- The sample is small so it may not be representative for all grasshoppers
- Grasshoppers aren’t the only insects in the meadow, so there are behavioural differences
- The insects aren’t all mature, so different metabolic rates
A biologist investigated the effect of water temperature on the rate of ventilation of gills in a species of fish.
She kept four fish in a thermostatically controlled aquarium and measured the mean ventilation rate by counting movements of their gill covers.
Her results are shown in Figure 1.
( Figure 1 shows a graph, “ Mean ventilation rate of fish “ against “ water temperature “ )
( “ Water temperature “ goes up to “ 30 degrees “ on the scale )
( The graph is a straight linear line which starts from “ 0.9 degrees “ to “ 25 degrees “ )
In this investigation, the biologist also monitored the concentration of oxygen in the water in the aquarium.
The concentration of oxygen in water changes with temperature of the water.
Figure 2 shows how it changes.
( Figure 2 shows a graph, “ Solubility of oxygen / g oxygen per kg water “ against “ Water temperature “ )
( “ Solubility of oxygen “ goes up to “ 0.08 “ in scale and “ Water temperature “ goes up to “ 40 “ in scale )
( The graph is almost a negative straight linear graph, but bends a little upwards towards the end )
( The graph starts from “ 0.07 “ in “ Solubility of water “ and ends at “ 0.04 “ )
( The graph starts starts at “ 0 degrees “ and ends at “ 25 degrees “ )
Suggest a difficulty of counting movements of gill covers as a method of measuring rate of ventilation in fish.
- Fish keep moving