Future Interests Flashcards

1
Q

Future Interest Capable of Creation in the Grantor

A

Right of Reverter (fsd), Right of Re-Entry (fecs) Reversion (le,everything else)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Future Interest in Transferees

A

Vested Remainder, Contingent Remainder, Executory Interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Vested Remainder

A

Created in an ascertained person NOT subject to a condition precedent

Three Types: indefeasibly vested remainder, vested remainder subject to complete defeasance, vested remainder subject to open.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Indefeasibly Vested Remainder

A

Holder is certain to acquire estate in the future WITH NO STRING ATTACHED

COMMON LAW: Future interest may pass by will or intestacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Vested Remainder Subject to Total Divestment/Complete Defeasance

A

Right to possession could be cut short by CONDITION SUBSEQUENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Vested Remainder Subject to Open

A

Remainder is vested in a group/class of people, at least one of who qualified to take.

Each class member’s share is subject to partial diminution because additional takers can join.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rule of Connivence

A

Classes closes whenever a member can demand possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Womb Rule

A

A child in the womb at the time of death takes with fellow class members .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Contingent Remainder

A

Created in an unascertained person OR subject to a condition precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rule of Destructionability of Contingent Remainders

A

Common Law: Contingent remainders were destroy if still contingent at the time the preceding estate ended.
Example (Condition requires person be at least 21, at time of death of preceding estate person was 20.)

Modernly: Rule has been abolished, and instead the heirs hold title subject to a springing executory interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rule in Shelley’s Case

A

Common Law: If life estate conveyed with remainder to life tenants heirs, the present estate and future interest would merge creating a FSA.

This was a rule of law, not construction and would apply despite grantor’s intent

Modernly: This has been abolished

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Doctrine of Worthier Title

A

Example: O to A for life, remainder in O’s heirs (O is alive)

Doctrine voids contingent remainder in O’s heirs and give O reversion.

Doctrine is not a rule of law, and if grantor clearly intends to creat contingent remainder in heirs, that intent is binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Executory Interest

A

Future interest created in transfer to 3rd party, which is not a remainder and which takes effect by cutting short some interest in another person (shifting) OR in the grantor and his heirs (springing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly