FUNCTIONALISM Flashcards

1
Q

BIOLOGICAL ANALOGY

What does this means? How is Parsons involved?

A

Functionalists see society as working as a system. Parsons acknowledges three similarities between the biological organism and society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

BIOLOGICAL ANALOGY

Systems organisms

A

Both society and the human are both self-regulating systems and interdependent parts that integrate together. Within the body, these parts are the organs, cells etc. Within society, the parts of the ‘body’, are institutions such as the family and education system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

BIOLOGICAL ANALOGY

System needs

A

Organisms have needs and necessities such as nutrition. If the organism does not have access to these needs, the organism will die. Functionalists see the social system as needing basic requirements for it to survive. E.g., members HAVE to be socialised if society is to progress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

BIOLOGICAL ANALOGY

Functions

A

The function of any segment of system is to fulfil its needs and ensuring its survival. E.g., the circulatory system and the body carry nutrients and oxygen to the tissues. Similarly, the economy helps maintain the social system by meeting the need for shelter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

VALUE CONSENSUS + SOCIAL ORDER

What is value consensus and why is Parsons passionate about it?

A

Parsons believes strongly that social order is effectively achieved through the existence of a shared culture/central value system.

This unity creates a framework that allows individuals to cooperate, as it forces them to behave within certain restrictions of their behaviour and such.

Their goals, for example, are outlined and solidified.

Agreement of shared values = value consensus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

VALUE CONSENSUS + SOCIAL ORDER

What is the social order and why is Parsons passionate about it?

A

Social order is only possible if members within society agree on the norms and values. This agreement of values is known as the value consensus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

INTEGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS - Socialisation + Social control

What is integration?

A

Value consensus is done to MAKE social order possible. This happens via integration:

This organises them into the system’s needs… e.g., the system has to ensure that people’s materialistic needs are met.

E.g., The consensus includes general value about the need for people to work. To successfully achieve this role, there needs to be a specific set of rules of norms and conduct. Punctuality and organisation are skills that are needed to obtain jobs etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

INTEGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS - Socialisation + Social control

What two mechanisms does Parsons believe are used to ensure individuals conform to shared norms?

A

Socialisation and social control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

INTEGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS - Socialisation + Social control

Socialisation

A

This is the process that ensures individuals are taught what the system requires of them.

Through this process, individuals are able to internalise the system’s norms and values so that society becomes a part of their personality.

There are multiple agencies of socialisation… the family, education, religion, media, and so on. These institutions all contribute to the socialisation process at different stages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

INTEGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS - Socialisation + Social control

Social control

A

Sanctions are dished out, to either reward conformity, whilst negative ones often punish deviance.

An example of this can be seen through the institution of education – the system stresses individual achievement. Those who conform get successful academic degrees, while those who drop out are stigmatised as layabouts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

INTEGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS - Socialisation + Social control

Cooperation

A

The integration of individuals ensures that everyone is in consensus with the shared value system, which means that consequently, their behaviour is oriented towards pursuing society’s shared goals, and meeting it’s needs.

As a result, everyone’s behaviour will be predictable and will allow cooperation. This integration makes social order possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

SOCIAL SYSTEM

  1. Individual actions
A

This is as the botton of the building block system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

SOCIAL SYSTEM

  1. Norms and values
A

Secondly, our actions are orchestrated by the norms and values we are taught

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SOCIAL SYSTEM

  1. Status-roles
A

These norms are apparant through state-roles

Statuses are positions that exist in a given social system e.g., a teacher.

These roles are essentially clusters of norms that tell us how people who have certain statuses must behave.

E.g., teachers must not show favouritism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

SOCIAL SYSTEM

  1. Institutions
A

Status roles build up institutions - the education system is an institution that has status roles:

Teachers, headmasters, students.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

SOCIAL SYSTEM

  1. Sub-system
A

Related institutions are grouped into sub-systems, who then contribute to a social system in its entirety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

SYSTEM’S NEEDS - AGIL

Adaptation

A

The social system meets the material needs (done so through the economic sub-system

18
Q

SYSTEM’S NEEDS - AGIL

Goal attainment

A

Society needs to set goals and allocate the resources to achieve them… the political sub-system does this through Parliament and the Executive.

19
Q

SYSTEM’S NEEDS - AGIL

Integration

A

Different parts of the system must integrate to ensure everyone has the shared goal… done through the sub-system of media and religion and education.

20
Q

SYSTEM’S NEEDS - AGIL

Latency

A

Processes that maintain society through time… kinship sub-system or the family does this through maintenance (socialisation which teaches individuals their roles). They also do this through tension management (stabilisation of adult personalities)

21
Q

SYSTEM’S NEEDS - AGIL

Which ones are expressive needs and which ones are instrumental needs?

A

Parsons believes that ADAPTATION and GOAL ATTAINMENT are instrumental needs – these are means to an end.

INTEGRATION and LATENCY are expressive needs – they involve the channelling of emotions.

22
Q

TYPES OF SOCIETY

Parson’s acknowledgement of two types of society:

A
  1. Traditional
  2. Modern

Each society has its typical pattern of norms (variables A + B)

23
Q

TYPES OF SOCIETY

Traditional V Modern
status

A

Trad: Ascription - status is based on fixed characteristics such as gender.

Mod: Achievement - status is based on performance such as effort in education etc.

24
Q

TYPES OF SOCIETY

Traditional V Modern
relationships

A

Trad: Diffuseness - relationships are broad with a range of purposes e.g., family farms

Mod: Speficificty - relationships are narrow and limited to specific purposes

25
Q

TYPES OF SOCIETY

Traditional V Modern
norms

A

Trad: Particularlism - norms emphasise treating different people differently.

Mod: Universalism - norms emphasise everyone being treated the same.

26
Q

TYPES OF SOCIETY

Traditional V Modern
gratification

A

Trad: Affectivity - immediate gratification of desires

Mod: Affective neutrality - deferred gratification

27
Q

TYPES OF SOCIETY

Traditional V Modern
interests

A

Trad: Collective orientation - putting the group interests first.

Mod: Self orientation - individualism, pursuing self-interest

28
Q

SOCIAL CHANGE

Transition

A

The transition between the traditional society and the modern society happens through social change. Parsons acknowledges that change is gradual and is an evolutionary process of structural differentiation.

29
Q

SOCIAL CHANGE

Parsons and applying the organic analogy to social change

A

The organic analogy has emphasis here as organisms have evolved from simple structures (bacteria) to the complex organisms (humans), with numerous variations of cells and organs – all performing specialised functions. Societies do this also… in traditional societies, a single institution performed numerous functions (e.g., the family). It traditionally organised consumption and production (ADAPTATION) and provided political leadership (GOAL ATTAINMENT) etc

30
Q

SOCIAL CHANGE

Structural Differentiation

A

As we develop and progressed, the kinship system lost its functions… political parties, factories, schools, and churches all took over their roles. Parsons labels this structural differentiation – a process by which separate, functionally specialised institutions develop, meeting different needs.

31
Q

SOCIAL CHANGE

Moving Equillibrium

A

Parsons particularly believes that this change happens through a moving equilibrium – one change happens in the system? Compensatory changes happen elsewhere

E.g., rise of industry = change from extended nuclear family to just nuclear.

32
Q

MERTON’S INTERNAL CRITIQUE OF FUNCTIONALISM

Indispensability

A

Parsons assumes that everything within the society (family, religion etc.) is functionally absolutely necessary in its existing form.

Merton, rather, believes that this is an untested assumption – he points to functional alternatives. E.g., Parsons believes that primary socialisation is best performed by the nuclear family, but communes or the reconstituted family may perform it better.

33
Q

MERTON’S INTERNAL CRITIQUE OF FUNCTIONALISM

Functional unity

A

Parsons assumes that every part of society is integrated into a singular entity, and that each party is functional for the rest.

Similarly, he believes that change in one part leads to change in other areas. Neither of these assumptions may be true, as our complex modern society has numerous parts – some parts may only be distantly related to each other. We may actually have functional autonomy, not unity, from others – it may be hard to see the connections between banking and netball etc.

34
Q

MERTON’S INTERNAL CRITIQUE OF FUNCTIONALISM

Universal functionalism

A

Parsons believes that everything in society is positive and performs a positive function for wider society.

However, functionality may actually be dysfunctional for others. Dysfunction introduces a neglected note into functionalism, by suggesting that there are conflicts of interests, and that people of power can keep the arrangements that benefit them regardless of the issues that it causes other groups. We cannot assume, like Parsons does, that society is smooth-running

35
Q

MERTON’S INTERNAL CRITIQUE OF FUNCTIONALISM

Manifest and Latent functions - what are they?

A

Merton uses the example of the Hopi Indians, who, when there was a drought, performed a rain-dance with the aim of producing rain.

This is its manifest function (intended function).

The ritual may have a LATENT function - an unintended positive consequence

Merton’s distinction outlines how there are hidden connections between social phenomena.

36
Q

EXTERNAL CRITIQUES

Logical criticisims - Teleology

A

Teleology refers to the idea that things exist because of their function.

Functionalists’ ideas that the family exists because it socialises children is teleological.

Critics are quick to address how the accurate explanation of something is one that addresses the cause of something. Cause comes before effect – functionalism, however, explains the existence of something (the family) by its effect (socialisation).

37
Q

EXTERNAL CRITIQUES

Logical criticisms - lack of science

A

Functionalists are criticised for the lack of science – theories are only scientific if they are tested. Functionalists, for example, view deviance as dysfunctional, and functional. If something is two things at once, it cannot be disproved.

38
Q

EXTERNAL CRITIQUES

Conflict perspective - marxists

A

Marxists, for example, criticise Functionalists for disregarding the explanations of change and conflict. This roots from the organic analogy, which states that all organisms are harmonious.

Marxists argue that society is not a harmonious whole. They would argue that it is rooted in exploitation etc.

They believe that their shared values are concealing the interests of the dominating class.

Conflict theorists believe that the conservative nature of functionalism legitimates the status quo and focuses on harmony and stability – not conflict and change

39
Q

EXTERNAL CRITIQUES

Conflict perspective - justifying the social order

A

The assumptions of universal functionalism and indispensability all justify the social order, making social mobility even more difficult. This helps the most powerful groups from losing their privileged position… they have the most to lose from change in social structure.

40
Q

EXTERNAL CRITIQUES

Action perspective - Dennis Wrong and determinism

A

Dennis Wrong criticises the functionalist perspective and describes it as too deterministic and over-socialised.

He believes that the functionalist view means that individuals have no free will or choice, as they are puppets who are being pulled by the system.

41
Q

EXTERNAL CRITIQUES

Action perspective - What do they believe?

A

The action perspective believes that individuals create society with their actions, and their actions are NOT created by the society. Action theory approaches society by suggesting it is not a thing with its own independent existence over and above individuals, but rather society is the social reality that individuals actively construct through meaning.

42
Q

EXTERNAL CRITIQUES

Postmodernism - diversity + instability

A

They argue that functionalism makes the assumption that society is stable and in order.

It does not account for diversity and the growing instability – functionalism, from the postmodernist perspective, is a meta-narrative that tries to model society as a whole.

According to the postmodernist thinking, there is no overall theory that is accurate as society is increasingly fragmented.