CRIME + DEVIANCE - MARX, CLASS, CRIME, NEO-MARX, JEFF BEZOS Flashcards
MARXISM
How do they view crime?
Marxism is a structural theory which sees society as a structure where the economic base determines the superstructure – this is made of all other social institutions e.g., state, law, CJS.
They believe their function is to serve the bourgeoisie and maintain the capitalist economy.
MARXISM
What three explanations of crime do they have?
- Criminogenic capitalism.
- State and law-making.
- Ideological functions of crime and law.
MARXISM
- CRIMINOGENIC CAPITALISM
What does this mean?
Crime is an inevitability because capitalism is criminogenic, which means its nature is very facilitating for crime.
Capitalism is founded on exploitation, and so in the pursuit of profit, the working classes are exploited. This essentially assists crime.
Crime may be the only way for W.C to appease their consumerist desire, and alienation/lack of control, may lead to frustration.
MARXISM
- CRIMINOGENIC CAPITALISM
What does David Gordon argue?
David Gordon argues that crime is a rational response to capitalism, and that it is found in ALL social classes despite ONS and other official stats disproportionately highlighted W.C crime, portraying it to be a W.C phenomenon.
MARXISM
- STATE AND LAW-MAKING
What does William Chambliss argue?
Marxists view law-making and enforcement as serving the interests of the capitalist class.
William Chambliss highlights this through his explanations of how laws protect private property.
E.g., introduction of English Law into Britain’s East African colonies – our economic interests lay in the colonies’ tea and coffee.
This required a large supply of local labour.
At that time, local economy was not a money economy, so, to force the African population to work for them, the British introduced a tax which could be paid in cash.
Non-payment = criminal offence.
The law entrenched the economic interests of the plantation owners because the tax could only be paid through working on the plantation.
MARXISM
- STATE AND LAW-MAKING
Explain the consensus between labelling theorists and Marxists.
SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT
There is consensus between labelling theorists and Marxists in that they both agree that there is selective enforcement of laws – powerless groups are criminalised, whilst the police and courts ignore crimes of the powerful.
MARXISM
- IDEOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF CRIME AND LAW
What does Frank Pearce note?
Frank Pearce notes, that such laws often benefit the ruling classes too – e.g., keeping workers fit and happy for work.
Laws facilitate false class consciousness: laws are also NOT rigorously enforced.
E.g., a law against corporate homicide was passed in 2007, but in its first eight years, there was only one successful prosecution of a UK company despite large numbers of death caused by employer negligence.
MARXISM
- IDEOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF CRIME AND LAW
How do we end up blaming the W.C rather than capitalism?
Selective enforcement divides the W.C because it appears to be W.C phenomenon.
Media outlets and criminologists also facilitate this division by portraying criminals as disturbed, which conceals the fact that CAPITALISM is the reason why people commit crimes.
EVALUATING MARXISM
Too deterministic
Overly deterministic. Not all poor people commit crime.
Capitalist societies don’t always have high crime rates – Japan only has 1/5 of the crime rate in the USA.
EVALUATING MARXISM
CJS protects everyone
The CJS sometimes acts against the corporations and capitalist classes e.g., prosecutions DO happen.
EVALUATING MARXISM
Intra-class crimes
Left realists argue that Marxism ignores the intra-class crimes (burglary etc.) where the victims and perpetrators are working class.
NEO-MARXISM
What is this approach?
This is a combination between Marxist ideas and ideas from other approaches such as labelling theory.
NEO-MARXISM
The New Criminology - who wrote it?
Taylor, Walton, and Young, in 1973.
NEO-MARXISM
The New Criminology:
what is argued in this
Taylor et al agree with the o.g Marxists that capitalist society is based on exploitation, that the state enforces laws with the interests of capitalist classes only, and that capitalism should be replaced with a classless society (which would reduce the extent of crime and would rid society of it completely).
NEO-MARXISM
The New Criminology:
what is their approach described as?
They describe their approach as critical criminology.
NEO-MARXISM
A Full Social Theory of Deviance:
what two sources are needed to compose this theory?
The two sources for this theory would be from (1) Marxist ideas of unequal distribution of wealth and (2) ideas from interactionism/labelling theory about the meaning of the deviant act for the actor (and deviant label effects).
NEO-MARXISM
A Full Social Theory of Deviance:
what are the six different aspects that need to be studied to establish a unified theory?
- Wider origins of the deviant act in the unequal distribution of wealth + power.
- Immediate origins of the deviant act and the particular context in which the individual commits the act.
- The act itself and its meaning for the actor.
- Immediate origins of the social reaction – so the reactions of those around the deviant when they discovered the deviance.
- Wider origins of the social reaction in the structure of the capitalist society – who has the power to define acts as deviant?
- Effects of labelling.
EVALUATING NEO-MARX AND C.C
Gender blind
Feminists criticise this approach because it is gender blind and focuses solely on male criminality, at the expense of female criminality.
EVALUATING NEO-MARX AND C.C
Romanticising criminals
Left realists believe that critical criminology romanticises W.C criminals as people who are fighting capitalist through wealth redistribution.
In reality, they prey on the poor. They also claim that Taylor et al don’t take such crime seriously particularly in its effects to W.C people.
EVALUATING NEO-MARX AND C.C
Changing beliefs - Taylor, Walton, and Young themselves.
*They define themselves here, but they HAVE changed their beliefs
Walton and Young defend some aspects of their book:
- They believe that it in calling for greater tolerance of diversity in behaviour, the book proactively combatted the correctionalist bias (the assumption that sociology’s role is to find ways of correcting deviant behaviour.
- They also believe that the book laid primary foundations for later radical approaches that wanted a greater, more equal society e.g., Feminist theories and Left Realist theories.
CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL
Brief introduction
Outline what’s said in The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Prison.
There is a much higher rate of prosecutions for the conventional street crimes that W.C are more likely to commit, rather than the crimes committed by M.C people.
Reiman and Leighton’s book highlights how the more likely a crime is to be committed by a higher-class person, the less likely it is to be treated as an actual criminal offence.
CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL
White Collar Crime:
who coined the term?
what were his intentions?
It coined by Edwin Sutherland.
‘Fraud committed by business and government professionals’
He wanted to challenge the stereotype that crime was W.C phenomenon.