CRIME + DEVIANCE - MARX, CLASS, CRIME, NEO-MARX, JEFF BEZOS Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

MARXISM

How do they view crime?

A

Marxism is a structural theory which sees society as a structure where the economic base determines the superstructure – this is made of all other social institutions e.g., state, law, CJS.

They believe their function is to serve the bourgeoisie and maintain the capitalist economy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

MARXISM

What three explanations of crime do they have?

A
  1. Criminogenic capitalism.
  2. State and law-making.
  3. Ideological functions of crime and law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

MARXISM

  1. CRIMINOGENIC CAPITALISM

What does this mean?

A

Crime is an inevitability because capitalism is criminogenic, which means its nature is very facilitating for crime.

Capitalism is founded on exploitation, and so in the pursuit of profit, the working classes are exploited. This essentially assists crime.

Crime may be the only way for W.C to appease their consumerist desire, and alienation/lack of control, may lead to frustration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MARXISM

  1. CRIMINOGENIC CAPITALISM

What does David Gordon argue?

A

David Gordon argues that crime is a rational response to capitalism, and that it is found in ALL social classes despite ONS and other official stats disproportionately highlighted W.C crime, portraying it to be a W.C phenomenon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MARXISM

  1. STATE AND LAW-MAKING

What does William Chambliss argue?

A

Marxists view law-making and enforcement as serving the interests of the capitalist class.

William Chambliss highlights this through his explanations of how laws protect private property.

E.g., introduction of English Law into Britain’s East African colonies – our economic interests lay in the colonies’ tea and coffee.

This required a large supply of local labour.

At that time, local economy was not a money economy, so, to force the African population to work for them, the British introduced a tax which could be paid in cash.

Non-payment = criminal offence.

The law entrenched the economic interests of the plantation owners because the tax could only be paid through working on the plantation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MARXISM

  1. STATE AND LAW-MAKING

Explain the consensus between labelling theorists and Marxists.

A

SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT

There is consensus between labelling theorists and Marxists in that they both agree that there is selective enforcement of laws – powerless groups are criminalised, whilst the police and courts ignore crimes of the powerful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

MARXISM

  1. IDEOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF CRIME AND LAW

What does Frank Pearce note?

A

Frank Pearce notes, that such laws often benefit the ruling classes too – e.g., keeping workers fit and happy for work.

Laws facilitate false class consciousness: laws are also NOT rigorously enforced.

E.g., a law against corporate homicide was passed in 2007, but in its first eight years, there was only one successful prosecution of a UK company despite large numbers of death caused by employer negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MARXISM

  1. IDEOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF CRIME AND LAW

How do we end up blaming the W.C rather than capitalism?

A

Selective enforcement divides the W.C because it appears to be W.C phenomenon.

Media outlets and criminologists also facilitate this division by portraying criminals as disturbed, which conceals the fact that CAPITALISM is the reason why people commit crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

EVALUATING MARXISM

Too deterministic

A

Overly deterministic. Not all poor people commit crime.

Capitalist societies don’t always have high crime rates – Japan only has 1/5 of the crime rate in the USA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

EVALUATING MARXISM

CJS protects everyone

A

The CJS sometimes acts against the corporations and capitalist classes e.g., prosecutions DO happen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

EVALUATING MARXISM

Intra-class crimes

A

Left realists argue that Marxism ignores the intra-class crimes (burglary etc.) where the victims and perpetrators are working class.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

NEO-MARXISM

What is this approach?

A

This is a combination between Marxist ideas and ideas from other approaches such as labelling theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

NEO-MARXISM

The New Criminology - who wrote it?

A

Taylor, Walton, and Young, in 1973.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

NEO-MARXISM

The New Criminology:

what is argued in this

A

Taylor et al agree with the o.g Marxists that capitalist society is based on exploitation, that the state enforces laws with the interests of capitalist classes only, and that capitalism should be replaced with a classless society (which would reduce the extent of crime and would rid society of it completely).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

NEO-MARXISM

The New Criminology:

what is their approach described as?

A

They describe their approach as critical criminology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

NEO-MARXISM

A Full Social Theory of Deviance:

what two sources are needed to compose this theory?

A

The two sources for this theory would be from (1) Marxist ideas of unequal distribution of wealth and (2) ideas from interactionism/labelling theory about the meaning of the deviant act for the actor (and deviant label effects).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

NEO-MARXISM

A Full Social Theory of Deviance:

what are the six different aspects that need to be studied to establish a unified theory?

A
  1. Wider origins of the deviant act in the unequal distribution of wealth + power.
  2. Immediate origins of the deviant act and the particular context in which the individual commits the act.
  3. The act itself and its meaning for the actor.
  4. Immediate origins of the social reaction – so the reactions of those around the deviant when they discovered the deviance.
  5. Wider origins of the social reaction in the structure of the capitalist society – who has the power to define acts as deviant?
  6. Effects of labelling.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

EVALUATING NEO-MARX AND C.C

Gender blind

A

Feminists criticise this approach because it is gender blind and focuses solely on male criminality, at the expense of female criminality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

EVALUATING NEO-MARX AND C.C

Romanticising criminals

A

Left realists believe that critical criminology romanticises W.C criminals as people who are fighting capitalist through wealth redistribution.

In reality, they prey on the poor. They also claim that Taylor et al don’t take such crime seriously particularly in its effects to W.C people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

EVALUATING NEO-MARX AND C.C

Changing beliefs - Taylor, Walton, and Young themselves.

*They define themselves here, but they HAVE changed their beliefs

A

Walton and Young defend some aspects of their book:

  1. They believe that it in calling for greater tolerance of diversity in behaviour, the book proactively combatted the correctionalist bias (the assumption that sociology’s role is to find ways of correcting deviant behaviour.
  2. They also believe that the book laid primary foundations for later radical approaches that wanted a greater, more equal society e.g., Feminist theories and Left Realist theories.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Brief introduction

Outline what’s said in The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Prison.

A

There is a much higher rate of prosecutions for the conventional street crimes that W.C are more likely to commit, rather than the crimes committed by M.C people.

Reiman and Leighton’s book highlights how the more likely a crime is to be committed by a higher-class person, the less likely it is to be treated as an actual criminal offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

White Collar Crime:

who coined the term?

what were his intentions?

A

It coined by Edwin Sutherland.

‘Fraud committed by business and government professionals’

He wanted to challenge the stereotype that crime was W.C phenomenon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

White Collar Crime:

what are the issues with Edwin Sutherland’s definition?

A

His definition doesn’t differentiate between occupational crime and corporate crime.

A further issue is that many crimes committed by the powerful don’t break any criminal laws e.g., admin offences such as a company failing to comply with codes of practice laid down by govt. regulators.

24
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

White Collar Crime:

what did Pearce and Tombs do?

A

They widened the o.g definition of corporate crime to ‘any illegal act or omission that is the result of deliberate decisions or culpable negligence by a legitimate business organisation and that is intended to benefit the business’

25
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

White Collar Crime:

who controls the law, as suggested by Tombs?

A

Tombs argues that the difference between the different offences is that it’s about who has the power to define an act as a crime – not really to do with how harmful the act itself is.

26
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Corporate Crime:

Brief outline - what is the cost of corporate crime?

A

It has a very disproportionate impact in comparison to street crimes: one estimate suggests that street crime puts the cost of white-collar crimes in the USA at over ten times than that of ordinary crimes.

27
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Corporate Crime:

  1. financial crime
A

E.g., tax evasion, bribery, money laundering, illegal accounting.

28
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Corporate Crime:

  1. crimes against consumers
A

E.g., false advertising, labelling, selling unfit goods.

in 2011, French Govt recommended women with breast enlargements from Poly Implant Prothese to have them removed because they were filled with dangerous industrial silicone and not medical silicone. 300,000 implants were sold in 65 countries.

29
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Corporate Crime:

  1. crimes against employees + work-related deaths
A

e.g., sexual, and racial discrimination, violations of wages, rights to join unions restricted, industrial action restricted.

Tombs believes that up to 1,100 work-related deaths annually happen because of employers breaking the law. This is greater than annual total of homicides.

30
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Corporate Crime:

  1. crimes against environment
A

e.g., illegal pollution, toxic waste dumping.

2015 – Volkswagen admitted to installing software in 11 millions of its diesel vehicles globally which could detect when the engines were being tested – it disguised emissions levels that were 40 times above the legal US limit.

31
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Corporate Crime:

  1. state corporate crimes
A

e.g., harms committed when govt. institutions and businesses cooperate to pursue their goals.

This is increasingly important because private companies often work alongside the government now. Examples include in education, war on terror, and in winning contracts (coronavirus).

32
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Abuse of trust:

Carrabine et al

A

Carrabine et al notes how high-status professionals occupy positions of great trust.

We trust them with our finances, health, security, and personal information. But they can easily abuse this trust.

33
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Abuse of trust:

Health professionals - Harold Shipman

A

Respected status of health professionals to means they can afford scope for criminal activity.

2000, Harold Shipman was convicted of the murder of 15 of his patients.

Over the course of 23 years, he has been said to murder 200 +.

He was able to do this in 1976, through obtaining powerful opiate pethidine through deception and forgery.

He also had enough morphine to kill 360 people – he only received a warning from the GMC and was allowed to continue practising as a GP.

34
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Abuse of trust:

Sutherland’s input on the impact on abuse of trust

A

Sutherland believes this is far more than W.C street crime because it protects cynicism and encourages distrust in basic institutions and undermines our society.

35
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Invisibility of corporate crime:

MEDIA

A

There is a limited coverage of corporate crime, reinforcing the stereotypes of crime being a W.C phenomenon.

Corporate crime is sanitised, using technical language, rather than real-life, relatable language. E.g., Defrauding customers = mis-selling.

36
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Invisibility of corporate crime:

LACK OF POLITICAL WILL

A

Politicians want to be tough on crime, but primarily focus on street crime and nothing else.

The Home Office use crime surveys to discover extent of ordinary crime but not does implement the same methods for corporate crime.

37
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Invisibility of corporate crime:

COMPLEX CRIMES

A

Law enforcers are usually understaffed and so lack technical expertise to investigate efficiently.

38
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Invisibility of corporate crime:

DE-LABELLING

A

Corporate crimes are consistently filtered from the process of criminalisation e.g., offences are often defined as civil and not criminal and even in criminal cases, penalties are often fines and not jail.

This can be seen in 2010, when the French authorities provided their British counterparts with a list of 3,600 UK citizens holding secret bank accounts with the Swiss subsidiary of the UK-based bank HSBC. This was used for tax evasion but only one prosecution was secured in the UK.

39
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Invisibility of corporate crime:

UNDER-REPORTING

A

Individuals may be unaware they have been victimised (you may not realise you have been illegally duped into buying the wrong mortgage), and even when individuals are aware, they may not regard it as a real crime… they may feel powerless against such a large organisation.

40
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Invisibility of corporate crime:

Why it’s not all doom and gloom

A

Since 2008 global financial crisis, the activities of people have made corporate crimes more visible.

E.g., campaigns against corporate tax avoidance, investigative journalists, whistle-blowers inside companies, and the media.

Neo-liberal policies such as marketisation and privatisation mean that large corporations are more involved in people’s lives and are more exposed to public scrutiny than in the past.

41
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Why does white-collar crime and corporate crime happen?

  1. STRAIN THEORY
A

Box building on Merton’s ideas:

If a company cannot achieve its goal of maximising profit, then it has to use illegal means to achieve this goal. When business conditions get tough, companies turn to break the law.

There is strain between a company’s fiscal goals and the legal means to achieve them.

42
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Why does white-collar crime and corporate crime happen?

  1. DIFFERENTIAL ASSOCIATION
A

Sutherland sees crime as learned behaviour from others.

So, if a company’s culture justifies committing crimes to achieve corporate goals, employees will also hold a criminal mindset.

  1. New employees are socialised into adopting deviant means to achieve their company’s corporate goals. This culture of business encourages competitiveness, aggressive personalities, and greed.
  2. Techniques of neutralisation - individuals deviate easily if they can justify their behaviour from moral objections.

E.g., white-collar criminals may say they were carrying out orders from above, they may blame the victims, they may normalise their deviance etc.

43
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Why does white-collar crime and corporate crime happen?

  1. LABELLING THEORY PERSPECTIVE
A

De-labelling sociologists applied this to white-collar and corporate crime… this is called De-labelling, stated by Nelken.

Businesses and professionals often have the power to avoid labelling – they can afford expensive experts to help them avoid consequences of their activities such as tax avoidance.

Reluctance of law enforcement = reduces number of offences officially recorded as such.

44
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Why does white-collar crime and corporate crime happen?

  1. MARXIST PERSPECTIVE - mystification of crime
A

Because capitalism’s goal is to maximise profits, it causes harm e.g., deaths, injuries etc.

Coinciding with this, capitalism has created what Box calls a mystification – it has spread its ideology that corporate crime is less widespread or harmful than W.C crime.

45
Q

CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Why does white-collar crime and corporate crime happen?

  1. MARXIST PERSPECTIVE - government cooperation
A

Pearce argues that the support the govt gives to capitalism means that the illusion that it is the exception rather than the norm is sustained, and that avoids the crisis of legitimacy of capitalism.

Companies only comply with the law if they see it being upheld strictly.

46
Q

EVALUATING CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Nelkson - don’t generalise!

A

He believes it is unrealistic to assume that all business would offend were it not for the risk of punishment.

Having a good status with other companies would prevent them from pursuing crime etc.

47
Q

EVALUATING CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

Braithwaite - profitable to abide by the law

A

Law abiding may be more profitable than law breaking:

Braithwaite found that US Pharmaceutical companies that complied with the FDA regulations to obtain licenses for their products in America were able to access lucrative markets in poorer countries.

This is because these poorer countries couldn’t afford their own drug-testing facilities, so they relied on the FDA licencing as a benchmark for quality.

48
Q

EVALUATING CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL

What about state agency crimes?

A

Regardless of capitalist pursuit of money being a cause of corporate crime, what about the crime in state agencies where pursuit of profit is irrelevant e.g., police, army, civil service.

49
Q

Voluntaristic

A

Humans have free will and can exercise choice in how they act, rather than their behaviour determined via external forces such as social structure.

50
Q

Deterministic

A

Humans have no free will and external forces shape human behaviour and thoughts.

51
Q

White Collar Crime

A

‘A crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation’

52
Q

False Class Consciousness

A

Inability to recognise exploitation and oppression because of how society legitimises the W.C position.

53
Q

Anti-Determinism

*A neo-marxist idea

A

Taylor et al argue that Marxism is deterministic, and that it sees workers as driven to commit crime because of economic necessity.

The neo-Marxists reject this along with any other theories that suggest crime is caused by external factors. Taylor et al are voluntaristic in that they believe that crime is meaningful action that has a political motive. Criminals are not puppets – they are deliberately trying to change society.

54
Q

Corporate crime

A

Committed by employees for their organisation in the pursuit of its goals.

55
Q

Occupational crime

A

Committed by employees for their own personal gain, often against the organisation they work for.