Free Will and Determinism Flashcards

1
Q

What is hard determinism?

A

They believe we are not free and so can’t be held morally responsible for our actions. We might feel free but that is only because I don’t know the causes of the action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is physical determinism?

A

Theory proposed by Sir Isaac Newton. Knowledge of starting conditions and relevant laws means successful prediction. e.g. penny will go the ground if you drop it because of gravity. Based on cause and effect. Observable events are subject to the laws of nature. Knowledge is based on the idea that events can be predicted by previous events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does physical determinism support hard determinism?

A

We are governed by the same physical laws as the natural world, theory of universal causation, everything is essentially predictable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the idea of psychological determinism?

A

We are all deeply socially determined. Gained strength with the modern development of social science disciplines.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did John B Watson propose?

A

Behavior is determined by nature and nurture. “I’ll guarantee to take any healthy infant at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select.” Behaviorism 1930.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Pavlov’s theory?

A

He studied dogs. Before conditioning the dog would saliva when seeing food and when it heard a bell it wouldn’t saliva. When there was a food, he would ring a bell. Then the dog salivated just at hearing a bell, showing we are socially conditioned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did B.F Skinner propose?

A

Investigated behaviour modification through reward and punishment called operant conditioning. Claimed that behaivoural science develops and psychologists learn to determine and control human behavior, especially through reward and punishment. It is highly probable human behavior isn’t free, but determined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the milligram experiement?

A

Started in 1961 when the trial of Eichmann the Nazi war criminal started. Test responses to authority, just following orders, could it be that Eichmann and war criminals were just following orders? 65% of people administered the 450v fatal electric shock, ordinary members of the public pressured to do so for an experiment. We are deeply socially determined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is biological determinism?

A

Steven Pinker and Richard Dawkins worked on Drawin’s principle of survival. We are influenced by guilt, anger and love and biology changes this behaivour, socio economic background, genetics and culture, influences on it. No diminished responsibility for our actions though. We might be able to predict outcomes and we are determined by our biology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Richard Dawkins think?

A

He thought we have a selfish gene and we are only morally nice to people, because the more people support us the higher our chance of survival. Emotions like guilt are genetic biological traits that fulfill evolutionary purposes, but still moral responsibility. Genetics link with sexual preference, behavioural attitudes like addictions and future illnesses like cancer,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Spinoza think?

A

Men think they are free, because “they know conditions of their actions and ignorant of the cause of them.” The mind is determined to will free will. There is a cycle of actions, you do an action caused by something that’s caused by something else. God is the cause of all things. Open theory, allows for all causes to work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did John Hospers think?

A

There is always something externally or internally that compels us to perform an action, but we think we have free will. He uses psychoanalytical examples to conclude “its all just a matter of luck.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What Clarence Darrow say to defend Loeb and Leopold?

A

Leopold and Loeb were a product of their upbringing, their ancestry and their wealthy environment mean they are not morally responsible. ‘ punishment as punishment is only admissible if the offender has free will to select his course.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the case of Leopold and Loeb?

A

In 1924 they kidnapped 14 year old Bobby Franks, they demanded a ransom of £10,000 to the family or he would be killed. They murdered him and left the dead body in a lake. There was a pair of glasses left and only 3 pairs of glasses made so traced back. Both from wealthy Jewish families, wanted to commit the perfect motiveless crime. Their alibis broke down and they confessed to the crime in detail. They planned the crime and were influenced by German philosophers like Friedrich Neitzche. CD defended them so got life imprisonment not the death sentence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happened in the case of Mary Bell?

A

Her mother was a prostitute specializing in sado masochism and she was forced to listen. She is thought to have been sexually abused by her mother. In 1968 age 11 she strangled 2 toddlers “solely for the pleasure and excitement of killing”. She was found guilty and broke down and wept. She got diminished responsibility and was charged not guilty. She was found to have a psychopathic disorder and was sent to a children’s institution. She was given a new identity and had a daughter, they were granted lifelong anonymity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was John Locke’s theory of the locked room?

A

There was a sleeping man in a locked room. He awakened and decided to stay, not knowing the door is locked. He thinks it is a real decision, but he is just ignorant to the condition that might have changed his mind. We think we are free when we decided to do an action but we are not. Free will is an illusion, we are causally determined: effects of previous causes, back and back, can’t be held responsible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did D’Holbach think?

A

Freedom is an illusion: “ You will say that I feel free, This is an illusion, which may be compared to that of a fly in the fable, who upon the pole of a heavy carriage, applauded himself for directing its course. Man who thinks himself free is a fly who imagines he has power to move the universe, while is himself unknowingly carried along by it.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Voltaire say?

A

” Pear trees cannot bear bananas. The instincts of a spaniel cannot be the instincts of an ostrich. Everything is planned, connected and limited.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Honderich think?

A

” All our choices, decisions, intentions, pre mental events and our actions are no more than effects of other equally necessitated events.” There is no moral responsibility or self, just psycho neural events. Everything is determined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is theological determinism?

A

The idea of pre destination that God has decided what everyone’s fate will be. God has chosen who will be saved and who will not be saved. God has given us free will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What does the book of Genesis say about free will?

A

God gave humanity the ability and right to make choices. Adam and Eve only culpable if they had the ability to chose their actions. Without free will, God couldn’t condemn or commend actions of humanity.
Hows does God’s omniscience this work with free will?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What did St Augustine of Hippo think?

A

He formed a controversy to Pelagius. He thought grace is a supernatural free gift from God. God brings humanity to salvation. The sin of Adam is fully paid in Jesus’ death, a free gift from God. All we do to receive the gift is believe in God. Only the chosen and elected by God are saved, we don’t know who has been chosen, so we all must live good lives. God knows all our choices and decisions, although we make them freely, God is omnipotent. How we live our lives is in our control. “ The potter has authority over the clay.” By the grace of God people hear the gospel and are saved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What did Pelagius think?

A

He started preaching in Rome, authorities realised he was preaching a different gospel to the apostles. Stated humans were responsible for their own salvation which they gain through their own efforts. Found favour in certain quarters in the Christian church, especially by those who saw deteriorations in morality among its members.
Makes nonsense of the Christian doctrine of salvation and pre destination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What did Aquinas believe?

A

Adam and Eve’s choice was freely made and not determined by some theistic design ‘ man chooses not out of necessity but freely’ Summa Theologica. No other choice, freely - total choice.

25
Q

What did St Paul believe?

A

God wanted to save the world through Christ. He choses who is saved and has the right, no one deserves salvation. Whole world is dominated by sin, so God can show mercy through Christ, Romans 11:32. Everything happens through God’s will: “ It is God who justifies”, Rom 8:33. Chosen are the elect and the elect are chosen before creation.
Who is elect and who is damned though?

26
Q

What did Calvin believe?

A

Influenced by St Paul and Augustine. Protestant reformers. God is omnipotent and omniscient. Before the fall and creation God predestined salvation to some and damnation to others, not based on individual merit but by sola gracia. God should punish those who are going to hell and the sin should be punished on earth as it leads to hell. People have no free will. “ People are fore ordained salvation for some and eternal damnation for others.”

27
Q

What did Edwards think?

A

American puritan theologian and philosopher. Book called freedom of the will. World depends on God sustaining it. Our wills are dependent on the causes that God has predestined for us. If humans had choices, which are spontaneous and self determined, it would violate the principles of universal causation.

28
Q

What is soft determinism?

A

We are both determined and free. Human actions are caused, because otherwise they would be unpredictable and random, An individual’s actions are free, they aren’t forced or compelled by eternal pressure.

29
Q

Which philosopher advocated soft determinism?

A

David Hume, in the 17th century he came up with the concept you can be determined and free. Freedom is incompatible with fatalism, but not with determinism, Those who say they are incompatible have misunderstood what we mean when we say we are free.

30
Q

Who was Hume influenced by?

A

Newton and causal restraints on objects - constant union of object, which provided the foundation for human free will. Events determined by causal chain link between objectives, In a given situation you make the decision to go one way or another.

31
Q

What did Hume conclude?

A

It is a determined situation, but a spontaneous decision, calculated choice is called liberty of spontaneity, get passed ball in rugby can pass or go through. Not by chance, as events are determined, In any given circumstance we are determined to be free. All actions are controlled by causes.

32
Q

What are internal causes?

A

Our own choices, for which we are morally responsible. If someone’s wishes and desires are counted among the causes of their actions then freedom is compatible with moral responsibility. E.g. Gandhi fasted to free India. However if it is an internal causes, like a mental illness and I couldn’t have acted otherwise due to internal constraints, I am not morally responsible. E.g. kleptomaniac who steals.

33
Q

What are external causes?

A

When we are forced to do an action, so cannot be held morally responsible. If someone could not have acted otherwise because of external constraints, then the person is not morally responsible. E.g. the man fasted in the desert because there was no food.

34
Q

What do libertarians believe?

A

We are entirely free in our choices, including our moral choices.

35
Q

What do they agree?

A

Agree the physical world is mechanistic all events are mechanistically caused and predicable and the mechanical chains if cause and effect might go to the animate world. We have to be free to be morally responsible regardless of past events.

36
Q

What did Peter Van Inwagen think?

A

Road analogy: the libertarian chooses which way, the determinist only has 1 road. A kleptomaniac left alone in a shop might steal, but they might not, but we can’t be certain. Physiological and psychological conditions may encourage them to steal, but they can still choose.

37
Q

What did libertarians think about moral responsibility?

A

You have to be free to be have moral responsibility not forced by outside forces e.g. Kelly robs a bank, completely morally responsible however if she was forced at gunpoint she wouldn’t be.

38
Q

What did they think about free will?

A

Nature and the universe has cause and effect, but doesn’t extend to human behaivour and choices e.g. will or won’t rain. Self determinism - we ourselves are determined to act a certain way e.g. do well in a levels. In everyday experiences we make decisions.

39
Q

What is the Buridan donkey analogy?

A

Donkey equidistant to 2 bales of hay, donkey would starve standing in the middle. Donkey doesn’t have free will. Humans stuck in a desert same situation, it it chance which pile of food they go to, they do have free will.

40
Q

How did Hume disagree with the Buridan example?

A

Humans disagrees not just chance, it is a spontaneous situation. Libertarian could go for either using reasoning.

41
Q

What did Kant think?

A

We don’t need to be dominated by cause and effect of out emotions as we use reason to make decisions and we become the originating cause of our actions.

42
Q

What did Kant think about the mind?

A

The mind using reason allows us to make free decisions, if we act with emotions we are slaves to our passions. Our will is autonomous and we are capable of acting from reason, we are responsible. Argues against Hume who said: ‘ reason is the slave of the passions.’

43
Q

What did Jean Paul Satre think about freedom?

A

Freedom is the goal and measure of lives, an end in itself and it doesn’t matter what they choose as long as they choose freely. Fill nothingness with freedom, it depends on the meaning the individual gives to his life. If someone avoids their freedom they are guilty of mauvaise foi and conforms to what is decided by others.

44
Q

What did JPS think about life?

A

Life is absurd, meaningless and without any reason why an individual exists or chose to do 1 thing than others.

45
Q

What did he say about freedom?

A

” To be free is to be condemned to be free”, to be free is to have a humanly fulfilling life.

46
Q

What did Kane say about freedom?

A

We experience deep freedom only at times of struggle when we feel feel pulled in 2 equally possible directions and we have to use our minds and wills to choose a path of self determination. Final freedom allows to act in a way not determined by our existing character. We are ultimately responsible for actions we make ourselves: “ self forming actions.” Undermined self forming actions happen when we are stuck between 2 decisions and visions of what we will become.

47
Q

What did Kane believe the 5 freedoms were?

A

1) Self realisation. 2) Rational self control 3) Self perfection. 4) Self determination. 5) Self formation.

48
Q

What is the incompatibilist mountain for Libertarians?

A

Free will being incompatible with determinism and proving indeterministic free will. They need to prove these exist and disprove Newton’s causation argument.

49
Q

What is a causally undetermined cause?

A

Free choice, agents themselves choose what to do and we are free to act and are morally responsible for those actions. When we act we have an idea that we are acting as free agents, when we feel torn we still have a choice. To have true freedom that act must be causally undetermined, the agent is the sole cause of the action. If determinism is false our actions aren’t caused. Science allows for uncaused events, random occurrences by chance - how can they use this in support?

50
Q

What was their first way of solving the dilemma?

A

Causation is not applicable to everything in the universe.

51
Q

What is the first argument in favour of this?

A

Quantum mechanics: At a subatomic levels you can only predict the speed or position of an atom. There is an indeterminism that can’t be predicted built into nature. Physical determinism is necessarily complete. E.g. Schrondinger’s cat in a box with position could be dead or alive, don’t know until you open the box.

52
Q

What was the second argument in favour of this?

A

Chaos theory: Apparently random behaivour within a deterministic system immeasurable variations in the initial; conditions affecting the outcome of an event. We can’t predict all actions, so surely not all determined. E.g. butterfly flapping its wings in Africa and causing a hurricane in USA. We don’t why this happens, but maybe we are just not advanced enough in science?

53
Q

What is their second way of solving the dilemma?

A

By showing human actions are unique.

54
Q

What is the first argument in favour of this?

A

Descartes theory of mind and body dualism: We have a mind/soul distinct from the body, outside of the physical world and its activity is not governed by the laws of nature. If a disembodied mind or soul could interact with the physical world by influencing the brain it could be the extra factor to explain free will. The immaterial mind and material body connect and free will exists as the immaterial part can control the material part, can’t predict what humans will do.

55
Q

What are the problems with Descartes argument?

A

Very vague about the immaterial part, easier to not believe in free will. How do the non physical and physical part interact? “at the price of mystery you can have anything.” Schrodinger.

56
Q

What was the second argument in favour of this?

A

Kant and the noumenal realm. Kant was a rationalist basing his ideas on a priori knowledge. Agrees with Hume a imperialist.

57
Q

What did Kant think about the world?

A

There is a noumenal realm the real world as it is, we never know the real world. Only know the phenomenal world, things we experience through our lens. Free will must exist as we have experienced the world as we aqre living in the phenomenal world where free will must exist. Your experience of the world is having choice.
But where is this realm and what if the proof?

58
Q

What was the last argument in favour of this?

A

The existentialists: John Paul Satre. Through man’s freedom we are human. we define ourselves by our choices, start as morally empty slates. Free acts give us self definition. Because God doesn’t exist, freedom makes us responsible for every action. People who avoid responsibility are not fulfilling their full potential.