Forming impressions Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

The fundamental attribution error

A
  • The tendency to over-value dispositional factors for the observed behaviours of other while under-valuing sitational factors.
    EX. A driver cuts you off in traffic. You will use dispositional factors to come to the conclusion that he is a bad driver, when in reality, this drive
  • It is not universal, but rather influenced by culture.
    EX.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Situational attribution

A
  • We attribute the behaviour to the situation and not the disposition (personality trait) of the individual
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dispositional attribution

A
  • We attribute the behaviour to the persoanility of the individual and not the situation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Self-serving bias

A
  • We tend to view our personal successes as reflecting our true abilities and failures as flukes of circumstance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The actor-observer effect

A
  • An attributional bias where a researcher attributes their own actions to external factors while attributing other people’s behaviors to internal causes
    EX. Actor-observer bias As you are walking down the street, you trip and fall. You immediately blame the slippery pavement, an external cause. However, if you saw a random stranger trip and fall, you would probably attribute this to an internal factor, such as clumsiness or inattentiveness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Above average effect

A
  • We are bisaed in believing we are above average on things that matter to us (attractiveness, intelligence and social skills)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Representative heuristic

A
  • We tend to judge a sample (A particular outcome) to be likely to occur if it is similar to the population from which it was selected, even if it’s not statistically probable.
  • Stereotype
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Availability heuristic

A
  • Our probabiliy estimates are affected by how easy it is to think of example
  • Previous experiences are drawn to come to conclusions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

False consensus effect

A
  • We tend to believe more people share our views than they actually do.
  • We overestimate how much others agree with us.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Illusory correlation

Availability heuristic

A
  • When individuals believe that two variables are related even though there is no evidence for that relationship. This is particularly relevant to the formation of stereotypes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The availabilit of flaws in memory

A
  • The experiement where students were asked to rate course with two improvements vs 10 improvments….with 2, there was easier available flaws giving a lower rating. Whereas with 10, there was less available flaws, giving a higher rating.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Relationship

A
  • A person who is attracted to you leaves you with a positive impression and you are likey to desire their company.
  • There are 4 factors:
    1. Proximity
    2. Familiarity
    3. Physical attractiveness
    4. Other’s opinions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Proximity

A
  • Not just physical distance but also functional distance: aka how often two individuals interact.
  • People tend to like those that they anticipate intearacting with.
  • low functional and physical distance and low they have the lowest distance therefore closer together and interact more often.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Out-group

A
  • See as a uniform set of people with precribed preferenes and views and even physical traits
  • Negative attitudes (homogeneity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In-group

A
  • See a diverse set of people with individual preferences, views and even physical traits.
  • Positive attitudes
  • Heterogenity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Familiarity

A
  • We rate faces as being more attracive the more familiar they are to us
  • Mere exposure effect: The tendency to percieve previous stimulus as more favourable
    EX. List of words ranked as positive or negative
17
Q

Physical attractiveness

A
  • You use the physical attractiveness on the presumption that what is beautiful is good (Often judging attractive people to be kinder, warmer and more intelligent) called the HALO EFFECT.
    EX. teacher and ugly student experiment
18
Q

Other’s opinion of us

A
  • Previous impressions of likeability influence novel impression of likeability
  • You like people who like you
  • When opposite to the inital impression, the new impression is strongly influnetial.
    EX. pos/pos, neg/neg are moderate. pos/neg low, neg/pos very high
19
Q

Covariation theory

A
  • Is the behaviour a reflection of a personality that is fixed? or is it a reflection of the situation?
  • Examines three variables to make attributions of whether behaviour is dispositional or situational.
    1. Consensus
    2. Distinctiveness
    3. Consistency
20
Q

Consensus

A
  • Different people, same situation
  • High consensus measn that most people behave in this manner, therfore the consensus is based on situation
  • Low consensus means that not alot of people behave in this way…only one individual person has this behaviour, making it. dispotional attribution
21
Q

Distinctiveness

A
  • How the same person behaves in difference situations
  • High distinctiveness means that individual does not act like this in normal situations…making it situational
  • Low distinctiveness means that they act like this for most situations….making it dispositional.
22
Q

Consistency

A
  • Same person, same situation
  • High consistency means that they behave like this for every situation, making it dispositional
  • Low consitstany means that their behaviour changes with the same situation, making it situational.
23
Q

Correspondent inference theory

A
  • Focuses soley on internal factors influencing a person’s behaviour to understand what motivates those personal behaviours
  • Explained by three variables:
    1. Degree of choice
    2. Expectation
    3. Intended consequences
24
Q

Degree of choice

A
  • The amount of freedom the actor had in choosing their opinion or behaviour
    EX. Debating the ethics of the death penalty, and one of your colleagues is arguing strongly in support.If you knew that he had chosen to be on the team that was arguing in support of the issue, you may infer that he truly believed in his message. However, if you knew that people had been randomly assigned to the different sides of the argument, you would have much less basis to make such an inference.
25
Q

Expectation

A
  • ## The degree to which an individual’s behaviour inv a particular social role matches our expectation
26
Q

Intended consequences

A
  • The goals and motivations of an actor underying their behaviour
    EX. A classmate running for social rep talking to you, you may suspect that they are trying to get your vote over thinking they are simply friendly