Formation, Termination, and Scope of Lawyer-Client Relationship + Duties to Clients Flashcards
Formation of Lawyer-Client Relationship
1) Express agreement between parties
2) Implied agreement based on intent and conduct (usually lawyer fails to clearly decline when the client wants help)
3) Court appoints lawyer
When can lawyers refuse to help a client?
Lawyers can refuse to help a client usually for any reason and MUST refuse when helping would violate a PR rule.
Can’t seek to avoid court appointment unless you have good cause. Same reasons for permissive withdrawal of representation.
Pro Bono Work
Pro bono work is encouraged but not required
Mandatory Rejection or Withdrawal
Lawyer must decline a case when:
ABA:
1) Representation will result in violation of professional conduct
2) Lawyer’s physical or mental condition substantially impairs ability
3) Discharged by client
CA:
1) same as above, PR violation
2) same as above, mental or physical condition
4) CA: if client wants you to act without probable cause and for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring another person, you can’t continue
Permissive Withdrawal
You may withdraw when:
1) Can be accomplished without material adverse effect on client.
2) Good cause (ex: client persists in criminal or fraudulent course of action involving your services, fails to fulfill obligation, used your services in crime, representation was made unreasonably difficult by client, client wants to take repugnant action or unreasonable financial burden on lawyer)
3) CA: client knowingly and freely assents
When Withdrawal Prohibited
Exception to rules on permissive withdrawal: you must continue representation when the court orders you to stay. Even if you have grounds for permissive withdrawal.
Responsibilities to Client when Representation Ends
CA: Client has a right to their file when the representation ends. That’s true even if they haven’t finished paying fees to you.
CA: Must refund unearned payments too.
CA: Must give notice and time to find another lawyer.
Scope of Authority between Lawyer and Client
Client has final authority over:
1) Settlement
2) Pleas
3) Waiving jury trial in crim case
4) Client testifying in crim case
Client’s Criminal or Fraudulent Conduct
Can’t assist client, but may advise on legal consequences
CA Marijuana Rule: when giving advice for felonies under fed law that are legal under state law (like smoking pot) the lawyer must inform the client about that related fed or tribal law so they know it’s legal in CA but maybe illegal federally/tribally
Limiting the Scope of Representation
Lawyer can limit scope of representation with client’s consent if 1) it’s reasonable to limit it and 2) client gives consent.
It would be unreasonable to limit the scope to like an hour’s worth of work if you know you can’t produce anything of value in just 1 hour.
Organizational Clients - Explaining Client’s Identity
Lawyer owes duty to the org, not the individuals. Lawyer must explain this whenever the org’s interest may be adverse to a person at the organization or someone the lawyer is dealing with individually.
Organizational Clients - Protecting Org’s Interests
If individual within org is committing violation in a way that would be imputed to the org, the lawyer must proceed to protect the org’s interests. Usually this means reporting the matter to higher ups like CEO or maybe even the Board.
Outside Reporting: If they fail to act, you MAY (but not required) to report the info to people outside the org in order to prevent substantial injury to the org. Only viable to the extent necessary to protect the org. That ability to “report out” is an exception to confidentiality.
CA: Outside reporting is prohibited. You could permissively or sometimes even mandatorily withdraw if you can’t do anything to help because you can’t report out.
Client with Diminished Capacity
May take protective action if client can’t protect themselves from substantial harm: like getting a guardian ad litem
You can reveal confidential info JUST to the extent necessary to help the client
Basic Duties to Client
Competence
Diligence
Communication
Competence
Lawyer has duty of competence to client. That means acting with legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and prep reasonably necessary for representation. Includes keeping up with tech and changing law.
CA: Also includes mental, emotional, and physical ability to work as lawyer
If you don’t know the law, you must decline the representation unless you could learn it quickly or consult with a lawyer who is competent in the area.
Emergency situation: you could act for a client without competence