Duty of Loyalty and Conflicts of Interest (Lawyer's Former Work and Special Roles) Flashcards
2 General Rules on Conflicts with Former Clients
1) CAN”T USE INFO AGAINST EM: Can’t use confidential info to former client’s disadvantage without consent or confidentiality exception. It would violate both.
2) TO SUE EM, GET CONSENT: If you have a new client who wants to sue a former client, you would need that former client’s consent.
Can’t Oppose Former Client in Substantially Related Matter
Can’t represent new client adverse to former client in same or substantially related matter.
Matter is SUBSTANTIALLY RELATED if:
- Same TRANSACTION or dispute OR
- SUBSTANTIAL RISK that info likely obtained in prior representation would MATERIALLY ADVANCE new client’s position
Example 1: repping a new client in divorce against one of your firm’s partners’ former clients might be substantially related if your firm partner learned a bunch of info about that former client that could help your new client.
Example 2: What if your partner only represented a real estate venture where Kim was a limited partner? That’s ok. As a limited partner you would know very little about her so there is little risk.
This might create conflicts with current client too.
Opposing Client of Former Firm in Substantially Related Matter
General Rule: Opposing the client of a former firm in a substantially related matter is prohibited IF the lawyer actually acquired material confidential information at former firm.
Exception: informed consent confirmed in writing
This means if you actually acquired confidential info material to a matter while you were working at old firm, you must not later represent a new client adverse to your former firm’s client in the same or a substantially related matter without informed consent of the former firm’s client confirmed in writing.
Effect of Incoming Lawyer’s Conflict on Firm
If lawyer’s conflict comes from association with former firm, others at new firm won’t be disqualified if:
- Disqualified lawyer SCREENED
- Disqualified lawyer NOT SHARING FEE
- Former client given NOTICE
- CA: above steps won’t work if disqualified lawyer SUBSTANTIALLY PARTICIPATED in the matter. The new colleagues face disqualification by imputation!
Firm Opposing Client of Departed Lawyer
If you leave a firm and take a client with you, old firm’s lawyers CAN OPPOSE former client UNLESS:
1) Same or substantially related matter, AND
2) At least one remaining lawyer has MATERIAL CONFIDENTIAL INFO
Conflicts with Prospective Clients
Basic Rule: You can’t rep a new client against the prospective client in matters that are:
1) same or SUBSTANTIALLY RELATED and
2) You gained CONFIDENTIAL info from prospective client and
3) that info could SIGNIFICANTLY HARM the prospective client
CA: any material info creates conflict - disclaimers don’t really work
Prospective Client = person who consults lawyer in good faith about possibility of relationship
If you’re gonna oppose a prospective client in a substantially related matter, look out for conflicts.
Conflicts with Prospective Clients - Imputation and Screening
Others at firm not disqualified if:
1) Disqualified lawyer AVOIDED EXPOSURE to UNNECESSARY INFO in deciding whether to represent the prospective client
and SCREENING TRIFECTA exists:
1) Disqualified lawyer SCREENED
2) NOT SHARING fee
3) Written NOTICE given to prospective client